tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-77766259003996699052024-02-20T00:45:15.526-08:00Just Build the FenceMaxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-31651704500672778022010-02-19T11:50:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:08:59.253-08:00More proof that Republicans are dumb as stumps<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/S37CWWhrUaI/AAAAAAAAAoE/Nh-2qLmytxQ/s1600-h/bush_billboard.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 240px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/S37CWWhrUaI/AAAAAAAAAoE/Nh-2qLmytxQ/s400/bush_billboard.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5439999089169879458" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><h1 style="font: normal normal normal 199.2%/normal 'palatino lineotype', palatino, 'times new roman', times; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; "></h1><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:Helvetica;font-size:medium;"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">"You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." (G.W. Bush - spoken at a Washington Dinner, March 2001)</blockquote></blockquote>More evidence that Republicans are still easy to fool all the time...... Now I know all Republicans are not stupid but many are still easily fooled by the NEOCON Rinos still leading the party. Apparently they have learned nothing yet from the complete betrayal of America by George Bush and his band of NeoCon New World Order elitists. Bush set up America for the Obama debacle and now they think they are going to ride back into power on a wave of discontent while they undermine and take over the Tea Party movement with their NeoCon operatives like Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin and Michael Steel and Newt Gingrich and that jackass McCain. They haven't changed, they haven't learned from their mistakes. They are up to the same old tricks of pretending to represent the conservative voice in America while they continue to import illegal aliens and export all our manufacturing capabilities.</span><h1 style="font: normal normal normal 199.2%/normal 'palatino lineotype', palatino, 'times new roman', times; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; "><br /></h1><h1 style="font: normal normal normal 199.2%/normal 'palatino lineotype', palatino, 'times new roman', times; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:Helvetica, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:medium;"></span></h1></span><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><h1 style="font: normal normal normal 199.2%/normal 'palatino lineotype', palatino, 'times new roman', times; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; ">"Miss Me Yet?" Bush Merchandise a Hit Online</h1><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; ">The cheery image of former President George W. Bush <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/09/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6189511.shtml" class="link" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: bold; font-style: inherit; font-size: 12px; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(25, 104, 178); cursor: pointer; ">appeared on a billboard</a> in Minnesota earlier this month, next to the words, "Miss me yet?" It appears a lot of people think it's a fair question.<br /><br />The online store <a href="http://shop.cafepress.com/miss-me-yet" class="link" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: bold; font-style: inherit; font-size: 12px; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(25, 104, 178); cursor: pointer; ">CafePress</a> saw a spike in demand for items featuring the same image as the billboard, the New York Daily News<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/02/16/2010-02-16_yes_they_are_missing_dubya_shopping_web_site_reports_spike_in_sales_of_bush_item.html#ixzz0fmUnOmpR" class="link" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: bold; font-style: inherit; font-size: 12px; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(25, 104, 178); cursor: pointer; ">reports</a>. Ten "Miss Me Yet?" items were on the company's list of its top-selling designs, CafePress spokeswoman Jenna Martin told the Daily News.<br /><br />"There were no Obama-themed designs on the list," she said. "Bush has stolen the political spotlight, just like Sarah Palin did the week before when she re-surfaced with crib notes written in her palm."</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/17/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6216739.shtml">http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/17/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6216739.shtml</a></span></div></span></blockquote>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-25605413802877492422009-10-21T20:43:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:08:59.262-08:0038 Locals (illegal aliens) Arrested in National Drug Bust<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SuDvMCsDyeI/AAAAAAAAAno/zhwUwu9yZak/s1600-h/drug+bust+3_m.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 250px; height: 188px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SuDvMCsDyeI/AAAAAAAAAno/zhwUwu9yZak/s400/drug+bust+3_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5395575343748991458" /></a>Illegal alien is what was left out of their headline. Yep, that's what they tell us. Illegal immigration is good for your community! I'm suppose to believe everybody wants a Mexican gang running a drug operation in their neighborhood. And, if your opposed to this that makes you a xenophobe racist bigot or something. Notice how there are no pictures of the scumbags published. I guess we wouldn't want people to actually see illegal aliens (locals).<br /><br /><div><blockquote><a href="http://wsbradio.com/localnews/2009/10/38-locals-arrested-in-national.html">(WSB Radio)</a> The Gwinnett County District Attorney's Office, Gwinnett Police, and the Drug Enforcement Agency release more details in a nationwide bust of a Mexican drug ring that netted nearly 40 arrests in metro Atlanta.</blockquote><blockquote>Besides the arrests of La Familia members, law enforcement confiscated 17 kilograms of cocaine , 188 pounds of crystal methamphetamine , 13 guns, and $50,000 cash at two homes in Lawrenceville and Lilburn.</blockquote><blockquote>Officials say one of those homes located at 1440 La Maison Drive in Lawrenceville contained the largest methamphetamine conversion lab ever seen in this country.</blockquote><blockquote>"The lab was found in a middle-class neighborhood... a white, split-level house. The only thing it didn't have was a picket fence," says Gwinnett D.A. Danny Porter. He says part of the success of the gang over the years is that members blended in with a growing Hispanic population in Gwinnett and operated inside quite neighborhoods.</blockquote><blockquote><br /></blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 238); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; "><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SuDvVxgkbHI/AAAAAAAAAnw/7TEj74wDmUc/s400/drug+bust+1_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5395575510936087666" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 250px; height: 188px; " /></span><blockquote>DEA Special Agency Rodney Benson says with more than 300 arrests nationwide, they've put a pretty good dent in the gang's U.S. operations.<br />"Whether it's taking away $32 million in currency, whether it's taking away dangerous ice methamphetamine , the weapons... clearly they've been impacted," he says.<br />The operation called Project Coronada conducted simultaneous stings in 39 other cities including Dallas and Los Angeles. More than 3000 agents and police participated.<br />Benson says La Familia is known for its violence including murders, kidnappings, and assaults. He says one of the leaders is behind the murders of 12 Mexican federal police officers in July.<br />"We have taken a lot of dangerous people out of this community and a lot of communities over the United States and that is the focus of drug enforcement," says Gwinnett Police Chief Charlie Walters.<br />22 October 2209</blockquote>This illegal alien activity is not just isolated to Atlanta - the scourge is nationwide. Thanks to the efforts of local and federal official a bunch of these cockroaches are of the streets - for now.</div><div><blockquote><br /></blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 238); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; "><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SuD34TdzzWI/AAAAAAAAAn4/3PEXUHyg8Xs/s400/drug_bust_279437c.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5395584900259892578" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 300px; height: 200px; " /></span><blockquote><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/WN/us-drug-raids-target-violent-mexican-cartel-la/story?id=8890312">Just before dawn</a> Wednesday, Drug Enforcement Administration agents launched a raid on suspected Mexican drug traffickers hiding out in a Los Angeles suburb.<br /><br />Vicious drug cartels are setting up shop in quiet neighborhoods.<br />Moments later, the suspects were brought out in handcuffs, caught in what authorities say is the largest national dragnet against Mexican cartels, which have been expanding their reach across the United States.<br /><br />The California raid was one of dozens that took place over the past two days, targeting Mexico's La Familia cartel, an organization notorious for beheadings and its brazen attacks on authorities south of the border. La Familia also ships huge amounts of methamphetamines, marijuana and cocaine into the United States each year, the DEA says.<br /><br />"They're very active, they're prolific and they're extremely dangerous," DEA agent Jose Martinez said at the scene of the Riverside, Calif., raid.<br /><br />The operation -- which authorities have called Project Coronado -- involved more than 3,000 federal agents and police officers in 19 states, resulting in the arrests of more than 300 people. Authorities seized $3.4 million, 730 pounds of methamphetamines, and more than 400 weapons from members of the cartel.</blockquote><br /></div><div><br /></div>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-10158806205357600392009-05-13T15:17:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:08:59.268-08:00Fed Dread – The hidden power of the Fed<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a>This was posted over at <a href="http://obamanationofdesolation.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/fed-dread-the-hidden-power-of-the-fed/">The Obamanation of desolation</a> blog.<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:'Lucida Grande';font-size:10px;"><h2 style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.8em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; margin-top: 30px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><a href="http://obamanationofdesolation.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/fed-dread-the-hidden-power-of-the-fed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Fed Dread – The hidden power of the Fed" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; ">Fed Dread – The hidden power of the Fed</a></h2><div class="entry" style="font-size: 1.2em; font-family: Verdana; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; line-height: 1.4em; "><div class="snap_preview"><p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-799" title="Spitzer_speaks" src="http://obamanationofdesolation.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/spitzer_speaks.jpg?w=210&h=158" alt="Spitzer_speaks" width="210" height="158" style="float: left; padding-top: 4px; padding-right: 4px; padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 7px; margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 0px; display: inline; " />When Eliot Spitzer isn’t chasing skanky little whores he is a pretty smart guy. Rumor is that it was the Fed was behind exposing his appetite for strange to the public. Well, we all have our weaknesses. Rumor also was that then Gov. Spitzer stood in the way of the Fed plans to reorganize Wall St in their image and likeness. You will note his demise took place before the Wall St collapse in the fall of ‘08. It was a coup, if you will, to get him out of the way. As the Governor of NY, he had jurisdiction over the NY Fed and Wall St. which orchestrated all the shenanigans of the collapse and TARP. Obama of coarse is their guy as is the new Gov. Patterson and what ever the Fed wants – they will grant.</p><p>It is interesting to see Spitzer come out with this info now. Perhaps he is looking for some payback. This is the only place in the MSM where you will find the truth about the unconstitutional power of the Fed. Congratulations to the Slate for publishing this. I saw him on CNBC last week and was impressed with what he said. This week some Fed lacky was already on there attacking Spitzer so he must be ruffling some feathers.</p><p><img class="size-medium wp-image-791 alignright" title="Obama_geithner" src="http://obamanationofdesolation.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/obama_geithner.jpg?w=179&h=139" alt="Obama_geithner" width="179" height="139" style="float: right; padding-top: 4px; padding-right: 4px; padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 7px; display: inline; " />So my questions is why doesn’t Fox News ever run stories like this? Where are Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and all the rest of the so called “conservative” leaders and  talking heads including “motor mouth” Sean Hannity? They are sucking up to the Fed – which is why they can’t be trusted. Now Hannity had Rep. Michelle Bachmann on his show and she was questioning the Fed but Hannity himself is silent. He is a Rupert Murdoch coward. Murdoch is a CFR media member.Even Lou Dobbs and Glenn Beck are wimps when it comes to taking on the Fed. Barry Goldwater was not afraid to question the power of the Fed. Neither is Ron Paul. CFR conservatives are fake conservatives. They pay lip service to traditional conservative values but when it comes to votes they are for the CFR and NAFTA and the Fed. That is why Newt voted for NAFTA. The CFR wanted it. That is why you you will never hear the media or few Republicans or Democrats question the CFR. They are the ones in control of the government and they are afraid of their power.</p><p>What is the connection between the CFR and the Fed? It is direct. Rockerfeller and JP Morgan were instrumental in creating both. The Fed was designed in 1913 to control our money and the CFR was designed in the 1920’s to control the government. It looks like the Fed is now taking a more direct role in our new socialist/fascist government. For decades they have pretended to be an independent government agency. Geithner was their coming out party. His appointment puts the Fed directly in charge of the US Treasury and Obama is their go to guy.</p><blockquote style="color: rgb(119, 119, 119); margin-top: 15px; margin-right: 30px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 10px; padding-left: 20px; border-left-width: 5px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(221, 221, 221); "><h1 style="font: normal normal bold 2.2em/normal Arial; letter-spacing: 0.02em; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-size: 4em; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(176, 199, 255); padding-top: 40px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">Fed Dread<span class="h1_subhead" style="display: block; font: normal normal normal 0.5em/normal Arial; letter-spacing: normal; ">The New York Fed is the most powerful financial institution you’ve never heard of. Look who’s running it.</span></h1><p><span class="byline" style="display: block; font: italic normal normal 0.85em/normal Georgia; color: rgb(102, 0, 51); margin-bottom: 3px; ">By Eliot Spitzer</span><span class="dateline" style="display: block; font: normal normal normal 0.75em/normal Arial; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); ">Posted Wednesday, May 6, 2009, at 12:29 PM ET</span></p><p>The kerfuffle about current New York Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Stephen Friedman’s purchase of some Goldman stock while the Fed was involved in reviewing major decisions about Goldman’s future—well-covered by the Wall Street Journal here and here—raises a fundamental question about Wall Street’s corruption. Just as the millions in AIG bonuses obscured the much more significant issue of the $70 billion-plus in conduit payments authorized by the N.Y. Fed to AIG’s counterparties, the small issue of Friedman’s stock purchase raises very serious issues about the competence and composition of the Federal Reserve of New York, which is the most powerful financial institution most Americans know nothing about.</p><p>A quasi-independent, public-private body, the New York Fed is the first among equals of the 12 regional Fed branches. Unlike the Washington Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or the other regional fed branches, the N.Y. Fed is active in the markets virtually every day, changing the critical interest rates that determine the liquidity of the markets and the profitability of banks. And, like the other regional branches, it has boundless power to examine, at will, the books of virtually any banking institution and require that wide-ranging actions be taken—from raising capital to stopping lending—to ensure the stability and soundness of the bank. Over the past year, the New York Fed has been responsible for committing trillions of dollars of taxpayer money to resuscitate the coffers of the banks it oversees.</p><p>Given the power of the N.Y. Fed, it is time to ask some very hard questions about its recent performance. The first question to ask is: Who is the New York Fed? Who exactly has been running the show? Yes, we all know that Tim Geithner was the president and CEO of the N.Y. Fed from 2003 until his ascension as treasury secretary. But who chose him for that position, and to whom did he report? The N.Y. Fed president reports to, and is chosen by, the Fed board of directors.<br />  </p><p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2217811/" rel="#someid0" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(184, 91, 90); ">more here:</a></p></blockquote></div></div></span><br /><blockquote><br /></blockquote></div>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-14797607038602562322009-05-01T16:13:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:08:59.274-08:00It's the Mexican flu stupid!<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a>The Obama Administration in full battle mode has decided they need to change the name of the 'swine flu' to a more politically correct version. Like "man made disaster" instead of terrorism. Overseas contingency instead of a war on terror. Now they won't call this flu by its proper name. The Mexican flu. I guess we can it to the long list of undesirable things that come from Mexico including 20 million illegal aliens.<div><br /></div><div>If it wasn't so stupid it would be funny. Now how about shutting the border and stopping all entrances of Mexican flu infected people from Mexico? How about protecting Americans first? Even the stupid inept republican party has been co-opted by the CFR open border frenzy. All Hannity and Limbaugh can talk about is Obama expanding the size of government. How about calling for the border to by shut you ninnies? </div><div><br /></div><div>This is a good example of how the Republicans have been led astray. A perfect opportunity to do the right think for America and point how just inept Obama is and all they can do is whine about the size of government and that this flu really is not a danger and 30,000 people die every year from the flu and we don't need to be concerned? What a bunch stupid partisan brain dead idiots. The same CFR Free Trade open border lobby that controls the Democrats still controls Republican party too.<br /><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu! </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-size:24px;">Mexican Flu!</span><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 1px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 1px; font-family:Verdana;font-size:14px;"></span><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 1px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 1px; font-family:Verdana;font-size:14px;">May 1, 2009 <br /><br />CONTACT: Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, <br /><a href="mailto:Press@alipac.us" style="background-image: none; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 153); font-size: 14px; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica; text-decoration: underline; background-position: initial initial; ">Press@alipac.us</a>, (866) 703-0864 <br /><br />While hyper political correctness tries to hold sway in America as not to offend or disrupt trade with our Mexican neighbors to the south, the official name of the new flu pandemic is Mexican Flu and not the PC terms 'Swine Flu' or 'H1N1'. <br /><br />Swine Flu and H1N1 are terms that describe large volumes of flu like viruses and not the specific strain at hand. Traditionally, pandemic flu strains are named after their points of origin. The point of origin for the new H1N1 pandemic flu, with swine flu DNA components is Mexico. <br /><br /></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 1px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 1px; font-family:Verdana;font-size:14px;">"It's a sad day in America, when you can't even call this pandemic strain by it's proper name 'Mexican Flu'," said William Gheen. "We are calling on all members of the media and citizens alike to refer to this pandemic virus as the Mexican Flu."</span></div><div><br /></div><div>http://www.alipac.us/article-4186-thread-1-0.html</div></blockquote><div><br /><blockquote><br /></blockquote></div></div>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-9016800097772582722009-04-27T12:16:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:08:59.280-08:00Obama Risks American Lives Open Border for Mexican Flu<blockquote>"This is how we will create a North American consciousness and a true North American Community. <b>It will be forged in the heat of conflict, not through a rational discussion, as painful as that may be. It really cannot happen any other way.</b>"- <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">Bruce Stokes, CFR Senior Fellow, speaking at the </span><a href="http://www.cfr.org/publication/7912/creating_a_north_american_community.html"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">"Toward a North American Community?</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">" conference (June 11, 2002)</span></blockquote>April 27, 2009 <br /><br />CONTACT: Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) <br /><a href="mailto:press@alipac.us" style="background-image: none; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 153); font-size: 14px; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica; text-decoration: underline; background-position: initial initial; ">press@alipac.us</a>, (866) 703-0864 <br /><br />Americans for Legal Immigration PAC calls on the Obama administration to immediately close the southern border and restrict all inbound air and ground traffic from Mexico to emergencies and product delivery immediately to protect American lives from the Mexican Swine Flu outbreak. <br /><br />"The Obama administration's failure to secure our borders against a possible pandemic is putting American lives at risk at a time when days and hours matter," said William Gheen of ALIPAC. "The weak and inadequate "passive surveillance" described during Sunday's press conference is offensive to the rational mind." <br /><br />Instead of advising American tourists not to travel to Mexico, or closing border crossings and air travel gates to essential travel only, the Obama administration is treating Mexico like a 51st state, instead of separate nation. <br /><br />ALIPAC is also critical of Obama administration's failure to appoint key leadership prior to this crisis. America is entering this crisis without a secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) or appointees in any of the department’s 19 key posts. President Barack Obama has not yet chosen a surgeon general or the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. His choice to run the Food and Drug Administration awaits confirmation. <br /><br />"Obama was playing golf Sunday. Instead, he should have been addressing the nation, securing the borders, and filling the gaps in our government leadership from an emergency command center!" said William Gheen. "He refuses to send troops to the border to stop the violence from spilling over or the Mexican flu from crossing into America. Instead we get second tier bureaucrats telling Americans to wash our hands and cover our mouths when we cough like a bunch of 1st grade students." <br /><br /><div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SfXUFhkpqhI/AAAAAAAAAnY/j_6ziRaYZOE/s1600-h/Obama_golf2.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SfXUFhkpqhI/AAAAAAAAAnY/j_6ziRaYZOE/s200/Obama_golf2.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5329398925439379986" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 156px; " /></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 1px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 1px; font-family:Verdana;font-size:14px;"></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 1px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 1px; font-family:Verdana;font-size:14px;"></span>As was reported <a href="http://obamanationofdesolation.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/swine-flu-outbreak-coincides-with-obamas-visit-to-mexico/">here</a>: Obama was in Mexico and Obama's host on a meauseam tour died the day after he met Obama. So does Obama have swine flu or did he bring it with him? He meets with the guy and the next day he is dead! Perhaps Obama should be quarantined. Or maybe he has the antidote?<div><br /></div><div>Even more disturbing is this story showing <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/04/ft-detricks-bug">missing vials</a> of weaponized flu from an Army Biolab? Is there a connection between these missing vials and an outbreak that coincides with Obama's visit to Mexico? Is this the crises Biden predicted? What does Biden know about this and when did he know it? Is it a CFR hatched plot to create a crises and then a false solution?</div><div><br /></div><div>We are however reassured by the White house: <span class="Apple-style-span" style=" line-height: 18px; font-family:arial;font-size:12px;"><blockquote><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21710.html"><span class="Apple-style-span" style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;">John Brennan</span></span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;">, White House homeland-security adviser, said there is “no evidence whatsoever” of bioterrorism.</span></span></span></blockquote></span></div><div>OK. Yea, that makes me feel better. If there is no cause for alarm then why did the White House declare an emergency while Obama was golfing? We find our unlikely hero Obama out playing golf on Sunday while The European Union is issuing travel warnings and <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Swine-flu-travel-warnings-apf-15039194.html?.v=7">inspecting</a> all people traveling to their countries from Mexico and the US. If they are then why aren't we doing the same?<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Of coarse today <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/obama-says-swine-flu-not-a-cause-for-alarm/">Obama said</a> the Swine flu outbreak "is not a cause for alarm." A global pandemic in the making - but it is not a cause for alarm? Neither was the bubonic plague Obama!</div><div><br /></div><div>But the <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=090427163029.7fthl1d1&show_article=1">UN Chief</a> apparently has a different take on the problem. Maybe he was not out playing golf on Sunday with Obama?</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 238); "><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/SfXm3pcHCqI/AAAAAAAAAng/qOgm552sC04/s400/UN_global_Pandemic+copy.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5329419577753799330" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: auto; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 240px; " /></span></div><div>To add insult to injury now a <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97QU7JO0&show_article=1">strong earthquake</a> has hit Mexico City sending office workers scrambling out of high rise buildings and into the street for safety. That should really help things down there - but as Obama said, "there is not a cause for alarm."<br /><blockquote><br /></blockquote></div></div>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-17783826411838836252009-04-21T14:54:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:08:59.286-08:00Chris Simcox challenges McCain for his Senate seat<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Se4NLyEQyTI/AAAAAAAAAnA/fgjNxbkKx7Y/s1600-h/Minuteman.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 273px; height: 195px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Se4NLyEQyTI/AAAAAAAAAnA/fgjNxbkKx7Y/s320/Minuteman.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5327209905295247666" /></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a>Here's some good news. It would poetic justice to see McAmnesty defeated by the founder of the Minutemen. McCain is one of the worst Republicans ever. He is no conservative. He is a CFR designated loser. He is a complete jackass. One of the most unpleasant experiences of my life was voting for this POS. Yeah I know, "he served our country." But you know what? That does not make him a great person or even a good person. Anyone that studied his service record know that he was a spoiled snot nosed jet jock that couldn't keep his planes in the air or his you know what in his pants..... <div><br /></div><div><br /></div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Se4OTFaZ-VI/AAAAAAAAAnQ/TBA1NChSQ2k/s1600-h/chris_simcox.jpg"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Se4OTFaZ-VI/AAAAAAAAAnQ/TBA1NChSQ2k/s200/chris_simcox.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5327211130259110226" style="float: right; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 155px; " /></a><div>Watch the left begin to gear up their racist rhetoric against Simcox. They have yet to discern the difference between anti-immigration and anti-illegal immigration. That is why I call them illegal aliens. I'm anti-illegal alien. I don't care what country your from. If your here illegally then you should be deported! A sovereign nation that controls its own borders and therefore it's own destiny is another concept lost on the confused left.</div><div><br /></div><div>Good for you Chris. I hope you kick his ass - politically that is!</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;"><h1 class="section_best_breaking" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; color: rgb(0, 66, 118); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; "></h1><blockquote><h1 class="section_best_breaking" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; color: rgb(0, 66, 118); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">McCain facing 2010 primary</h1><p class="blogtext" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; "></p><p>Social conservatives tolerated John McCain as the party's nominee, but never trusted him, and he now appears to be facing a serious primary from the right in Arizona next year.</p><p>Chris Simcox, the founder of the <a href="http://www.minutemanhq.com/" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 66, 118); ">Minuteman Civil Defense Corps</a> and a prominent figure in the anti-immigration movement, will announcing tomorrow at an event on the Mexican border that he's resigned from the group to run in the 2010 Senate primary.</p><p>From a forthcoming release:</p><blockquote>"John McCain has failed miserably in his duty to secure this nation's borders and protect the people of Arizona from the escalating violence and lawlessness," Simcox said. "He has fought real efforts over the years at every turn, opting to hold our nation's border security hostage to his amnesty schemes. Coupled with his votes for reckless bailout spending and big government solutions to our nation's problems, John McCain is out of touch with everyday Arizonans. Enough is enough."</blockquote><p>McCain was forced to abandon his own immigration reform legislation during last year's Republican Primary, a move that may have cost him substantial Hispanic support to which his record could have given him access.</p><p>So he's basically getting it from both sides on this one.</p><p>Simcox, with a national base and a high profile on the right, is well positioned to give McCain a serious local headache. He'll find some allies among the conservatives who recently took over the Arizona Republican Party from McCain's allies, and he has a national fundraising base.</p></blockquote><p></p></span><blockquote><br /></blockquote></div>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-8205327480522070542009-03-10T15:07:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:08:59.291-08:00Oath Keepers: "Declaration of Orders We Will NOT Obey"<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a>The following was posted at <a href="http://obamanationofdesolation.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we-will-not-obey/">Obamanation of Desolation.</a><br /><br /><blockquote>People in the military are declaring there are orders they will not obey. Below is a following list. Good for them. It sucks when you want to serve and protect your country but you find out your just being used for political purposes. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE52812L20090309">Exxon Mobil is poised for a big role</a> in Iraq's oil sector. Is that what this damn Iraq war was really all about??? Fighting for Exxon Mobile? That is how it now appears to me.<br /> <br /><a href="http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2009/03/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we.html">Oath Keepers</a> is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, peace officers, and veterans who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic … and meant it.<br />Our oath is to the Constitution, not to the President, and that oath will be kept. We won’t “just follow orders.”<br /><br /><div>Below is our declaration of orders we will NOT obey because we will consider them unconstitutional (and thus unlawful) and immoral violations of the natural rights of the people. Such orders would be acts of war against the American people by their own government, and thus acts of treason. We will not make war against our own people. We will not commit treason. We will defend the Republic.<br /><br />Declaration of Orders We Will NOT Obey:<br /><br />Recognizing that we each swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and affirming that we are guardians of the Republic, of the principles in our Declaration of Independence, and of the rights of our people, we affirm and declare the following:<br /><br />1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people.<br />2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects - such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons.<br />3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal.<br />4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor.<br />5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union.<br />6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.<br />7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.<br />8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war.<br />9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever.<br />10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.</div></blockquote><div></div>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-45192957111174562272008-03-07T11:39:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.274-08:00The Dustin Inman Society rallies against John McCain in Atlanta<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GTeDh4ewI/AAAAAAAAAIo/9v2geoLszRw/s1600-h/McCain_amigo.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GTeDh4ewI/AAAAAAAAAIo/9v2geoLszRw/s320/McCain_amigo.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175079591378189058" border="0" /></a>A rally against the tireless amnesty advocate John McCain was held in Atlanta, GA on March 6th. It was organized by D.A. King of the <a href="http://www.thedustininmansociety.org/">Dustin Inman Society</a>. Local patriots from the Georgia Chapter of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps were also present in numbers. John McAmnesty was here to attend the $1000 plate fundraiser at the Westin Hotel in Buckhead. While the Republican leadership tries to put on a unified face, the reality is that the party is divided over the illegal immigration issue. Both Bush and McCain have done tremendous damage to Republican unity as they continue their assault on our basic conservative principles. After 9/11 our Border Security should be top priority for ALL AMERICANS. Now we find the entrenched political forces are placing a priority on getting illegal immigrants into America by the millions instead. Why is that? The open border advocates claim that this is the American dream and they are just sharing it.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GVKTh4e0I/AAAAAAAAAJI/_Z93m2TFbzI/s1600-h/IMG_0017.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GVKTh4e0I/AAAAAAAAAJI/_Z93m2TFbzI/s400/IMG_0017.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175081451099028290" border="0" /></a>Part of the great American tradition is in fact just that. On the Statue of Liberty it is written, "Give me your tired and poor, your huddled masses yearning to be free". It is the essence of the America spirit. America shares that spirit with approximately 2 million new LEGAL immigrants every year. Some convincingly argue that even that is too many for us to absorb. You can only dissolve a certain amount of salt in a glass of water. After the water reaches it's point of saturation the salt is no longer absorbed. The melting pot of American culture can only take in so many immigrants during a certain period. It takes time before they are fully absorbed into American society. If this does not occur then the opposite happens. Our society starts to look like and resemble a foreign country - like Mexico for example. It could be transformed into just another third world country. The current president of Mexico, Carlderon has recently stated, "I have said that Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico." I would surmise that that is precisely the problem. We don't want Mexico and all of it's third world mentality and corruption here in the United States.<br /><br />The unfortunate reality is that Mexico is now exporting its problems to the United States. We have a real trade deficit here. There are neighborhoods in Atlanta that are completely overrun with illegals. Local Law enforcement is not equipped to deal with the volume of criminal activity in these neighborhoods and it is a drain on scare resources. Gangs and drugs run rampant. Citizens are murdered, raped, robbed and violated at an alarming rate. Drunk drivers prowl our streets. Our jails are occupied by over 30% of illegal alien criminals (and these just the ones we catch). Jobs are lost, wages are depressed. Schools and State and local social services are overwhelmed and list of the abuses of the American way of life goes on and on and on.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWWTh4e2I/AAAAAAAAAJY/eKh7ZkULUWo/s1600-h/IMG_0020.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWWTh4e2I/AAAAAAAAAJY/eKh7ZkULUWo/s400/IMG_0020.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175082756769086306" border="0" /></a>Where will it end? The open border advocates tell us that amnesty is the answer. Amnesty is a proven failure. The Reagan 1986 amnesty is proof of that. It laid the groundwork the for the problem that we have here today. They tell us comprehensive immigration reform is the answer. Really? How is that the answer? If we can't enforce our current immigration laws then how can we expect the government to enforce new ones? Any form of amnesty will only encourage more illegal immigration in the future. How will that bring America security? How can we share the American dream if it is destroyed by the violation of the legal process? Immigration laws exist for a reason. The inability of a government to enforce the law is the beginning of the failure of that government and that society. Laws are the framework and bulwark of any society. Our immigration laws are fair and generous. There is a process to change those laws. Allowing <a href="http://www.thedustininmansociety.org/info/illegal_alien_numbers.html">35 million illegal immigrants</a> into your country in not the process. Yes - that is the number that is estimated by those who are far more competent than our own government. Have you noticed that they have been using the 12 million number for many years now. We know that over 500,000 new illegal immigrants cross our southern border every year. So if they were being honest it would now be at least 14 million now. But the government is not honest and they have an agenda.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWNjh4e1I/AAAAAAAAAJQ/XYIOtw9B6Fo/s1600-h/IMG_0018.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWNjh4e1I/AAAAAAAAAJQ/XYIOtw9B6Fo/s400/IMG_0018.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175082606445230930" border="0" /></a>So what is that agenda? The answer is simple, follow the money. Who benefits from illegal immigration? Businesses do. Employers who save money on labor costs. Wall Street benefits and the world bankers benefit. The Council of Foreign relations benefits and McCain is a long time CFR member. So big business benefits and Americans pay the price. Meanwhile, politicians like McCain tell us that this is the American dream. Seems like a nightmare to me. I don't think this is what the founding fathers envisioned. I'm convinced they would be planning a new Boston Tea party to throw of the yoke of the oppressors who lie to us about the American dream. As a society we have becomes the slaves of our new masters on Wall street and Washington who they control. As a nation we are in debt and bankrupt. Debt is slavery and we are all slaves of the debt in America.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWtjh4e5I/AAAAAAAAAJw/K4WjlGQCY8Q/s1600-h/IMG_0029.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWtjh4e5I/AAAAAAAAAJw/K4WjlGQCY8Q/s400/IMG_0029.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175083156201044882" border="0" /></a>A good friend of mine recently stated to me that, "as the great-grandchild of immigrants I am happy to share the land, it was not mine to begin with." Actually this "our land" and we are responsible for it. Just how many terrorists is she willing to share the land with? How many gangs and drug cartels is she willing to share the land with? How many sexual predators and murderers and drunk drivers? As a mother of four children, you would think that she had some presence of mind about the security and future of our country. How are we going to share the American dream if we don't take care of it ourselves? The only way to secure the country is to have a secure border. The only way to have a secure border is to stop illegal immigration. The only way to stop illegal immigration is to build a fence and stop anybody that tries to cross it illegally. Enforcement of the law is also a necessary step. Any other proposal is a fraud. We lock our doors at night for security to protect ourselves and our loved ones. It should be no different at our border. It is the only way to protect our country and all that we hold dear. If we suffer another terrorist attack and the perpetrators entered the country across our southern border will people finally wake up? Just how many 9/11's do we need to suffer through?<br /><br />YOU CAN'T SHARE A DREAM IF YOU DON'T PROTECT IT.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.reluctantvoter.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9HJ3Dh4e7I/AAAAAAAAAKA/YWvwTRL30KY/s320/McCain_Iguess.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175139394502818738" border="0" /></a>I have heard John McCain talk about immigrants serving in our Armed Forces in Iraq. He interjects this argument as if it were a justification for amnesty and illegal immigration. But anybody that is serving in our military is a LEGAL IMMIGRANT. They are not here illegally. They came here legally and they should be lauded for serving. They should be granted citizenship for it as well. But you can't join the military if you are here illegally. It is a dishonest argument. He gets all emotional about it as if he were making some big point. It is just typical of the lies that come out of the mouth of the "straight talk express". I for one am sick and tired of the lies of politicians with ulterior motives. I'm sick and tired of politicians who serve the interests of Wall Street bankers. John McCain is one of those politicians.<br /><br />Here are few more pictures from the rally.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWdjh4e3I/AAAAAAAAAJg/6v_63woZsvA/s1600-h/IMG_0021.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWdjh4e3I/AAAAAAAAAJg/6v_63woZsvA/s400/IMG_0021.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175082881323137906" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWljh4e4I/AAAAAAAAAJo/gZh86v2iozY/s1600-h/IMG_0028.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GWljh4e4I/AAAAAAAAAJo/gZh86v2iozY/s400/IMG_0028.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175083018762091394" border="0" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GW8jh4e6I/AAAAAAAAAJ4/Zir3jZCa2rg/s1600-h/IMG_0030.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R9GW8jh4e6I/AAAAAAAAAJ4/Zir3jZCa2rg/s400/IMG_0030.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175083413899082658" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><blockquote><br /></blockquote></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-60507920859087906382008-02-17T09:48:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.279-08:00Now Vietnam Veterans are against John McCain<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R7hZOq577KI/AAAAAAAAAIg/_GLX08aKjmM/s1600-h/mccainkerryclinton.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R7hZOq577KI/AAAAAAAAAIg/_GLX08aKjmM/s320/mccainkerryclinton.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5167978680977976482" border="0" /></a>I was proud to support the Vietnam Veterans against John Kerry in 2004 because I believed they were correct in identifying John Kerry as a traitor. I now feel the same is true about John McCain. Interestingly the same media that tried to cover up the truth about John Kerry is doing the same about McCain. The answer is quite simple. He is a CFR guy and they will do everything they can to protect him. The internet is not something they can control. Therefore we have this information and it does not have to be filtered by the media before we hear or never hear about it.<br /><br />The fact that he sponsored Shamnesty is reason enough for me to oppose John McCain. Apparently their are enough brain-dead Republicans out there to get him nominated for president. We can see the failure of party politics in America today. I have come to the conclusion that both parties are a disaster for America. Here are some videos linked on YouTube that show just what type of person John McCain really is. War hero or zero!<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Veitnam Veterans against John McCain</span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vFM1xqqTX_g&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20080318123213oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/vFM1xqqTX_g&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Black Ace John McCain</span><br /><br />John McCain was right in the middle of the US Forrestal fire disaster in 1967. Some claim he started the whole thing by 'wet starting' his A-4 Skyhawk which caused the Zuni rocket on the F-4 to shoot a whole in the fuel tank on his A-4. McCain escaped but 167 Navy personnel died in the disaster. Where was McCain while Navy personnel were dying trying to fight the fire? No doubt he high tailed it out of the danger area. Thank you war hero John McCain! It is possible that the whole thing was an accident, just an electrical failure but why was McCain transferred immediately from the Forrestal? Why is this part of his military record not reported to us by the media? And don't forget the fact that he crashed 5 jets. He was shot down in the last one so he can't be blamed for that. But at the same time it does not excuse all his other indiscretions. He was the son of an active duty Navy Admiral so perhaps he received a lot of special treatment. He did not have a good service record - period.<br /><br /><div>The quote below is circulating chat sites online. There is no link to or verify any of the witnesses or documents to support the assertion that he was responsible for the Forrestal fire. If there ever was any I'm sure it is not available for our education as to what really happened on the Forrestal. We do know he was there. He was transferred immediately. It was his plane that was hit by the Zuni. I would like to hear from the witnesses that say he started it by "wet starting" his A-4. McCain has always been a hot headed, loose cannon. I'm sure if he did this it was just a stupid mistake. Can you imagine trying to get to the bottom of Navy documents on this mess? Interestingly McCain has been the goto guy for passing legislation that prevents us from finding out what really happened in Vietnam. Maybe John can provide the records of the investigation into the incident.<br /><blockquote>Crashed 5 jets, plus was responsible for the Forrestal fire. Surviving crewmen and those who investigated the Forrestal fire case reported that McCain deliberately 'wet-started' his A-4E Skyhawk to shake up the guy in the F-4 Phantom behind his A-4. 'Wet-starts', done either deliberately (the starter motor switch allowed kerosene to pool in the engine and give a wet start) or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft. In McCain's case, the 'wet-start' 'cooked off' and launched the M34 Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that punctured the Skyhawk's fueltank, knocked the M-65 1000 lb bomb off it's 500 lb rated mount, and touched off the explosions and massive fire. The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration, along with 167 of his fellow Forrestal shipmates (including those who died later from wounds suffered). 'Wet starting' was a common practice among young 'hot-dog' pilots. McCain was quickly (they were still counting the Forrestal dead) transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred).<br /><br /></blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;">USS Forrestal Mishap July 29, 1967</span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/chuiyXQKw3I&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20080318123213oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/chuiyXQKw3I&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />Maybe it is time we get some real truth from the so called "straight talking John McCain." Here is a funny video showing just how ridiculous McCain is when it comes to real economic policies. McCain is an open border, free trade amnesty advocate for Wall Street and the CFR. Period.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">John McCain and Miss Teen USA South Carolina</span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tu-tg1kQ8dk&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20080318123213oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/Tu-tg1kQ8dk&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br /><br />McCain was very adamant in his opposition to the Swift Boat Veterans. We now understand why. Here are some links to some good sites about the real John McCain. And no they are not from some left wing nut job sites and no they are not democratic operatives working for Hillary and no they are not working for John Kerry either. And finally - no I am not some part of a conspiracy to slander John McCain for political reasons. Unfortunately it is just the truth. A tough pill to swallow for brain-dead republicans and a real joy for brain-dead democrats.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.usvetdsp.com/jan08/mccain_military_record.htm">http://www.usvetdsp.com/jan08/mccain_military_record.htm</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_secretworldofmccain.htm">http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_secretworldofmccain.htm </a></div></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-53962717740449925432008-02-06T10:37:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.283-08:00The Bible belt nominates lame John McCain<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R6tUVq-CrtI/AAAAAAAAAIQ/LE6cAvvmhXQ/s1600-h/McCain_Benedict.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R6tUVq-CrtI/AAAAAAAAAIQ/LE6cAvvmhXQ/s320/McCain_Benedict.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5164314128998903506" border="0" /></a>In a another stunning development southern evangelicals turn out to vote for Huckabee. In doing so they in effect guaranteed John McCain the Republican nomination. By siphoning off the vote that in my opinion should have gone to Romney they have rendered his candidacy virtually dead. Huckabee will eventually concede and perhaps for the VP spot give his delegates to McCain. Southern conservatives have been had once again by the politics of deception. Their voting power has been neutralized as an effective voting block. Now they will have to line up behind McCain in a general election but in the end Hillary will win.<br /><br />There are many conservatives like myself who will never vote for McCain. What are we to do? Vote for Hillary? You notice I didn't say Obama because I don't believe the Clintons will let him win the nomination - even if they have to kill him. Of coarse they will make it look like the Republicans killed him just like they tried to blame Oklahoma on the vast right wing conspiracy. I do not wish this to happen for Obama. I've actually grown to like the guy even if I completely disagree with his politics.<br /><br />The conspiracy here is not with the vast right wing but it originates in the CFR. Huckabee is a CFR guy as is McCain. I don't know about Romney - may he is, maybe he isn't. Reagan wasn't a CFR guy but he was surrounded by them. Clinton and Obama both are. So we have three open border amnesty CFR candidates left in the race. Soon it will only be two. One thing is for certain. We will soon have a new Panderer in Chief in the White House and the CFR will be still running our government. Now that is some real change!<br /><br />As of Romney's announcement today I have suspend my affiliation with the Republican party. I cannot support a party that nominates a pretend conservative like John McCain. He is as big a joke as George Bush was. Folks we've been had. I will become an independent. If a candidate better than Bloomberg does not appear I shall have to vote for a democrat. I will never vote for McCain as president. He is an lying emotionally unstable illegal pandering psycho. He will never win a general election. That is another reason the MSM have endorsed him. He will be as easy to beat as Bob Dole was in '96.<br /><a href="http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/002686.html"><br />Thanks to Dan over at Digger's Realm for putting this video together!</a><br /><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kqAOxflHPR0&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20080318123213oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/kqAOxflHPR0&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-69991456260492772582008-01-23T13:22:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.287-08:00Bloomberg panders to illegals while the economy burns<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R5eL7a-CrsI/AAAAAAAAAII/h-xL2vUzE-Q/s1600-h/bloomberg-golf.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R5eL7a-CrsI/AAAAAAAAAII/h-xL2vUzE-Q/s200/bloomberg-golf.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5158745751144279746" border="0" /></a>Before he is even out of the gate, Michael Bloomberg dooms his potential independent candidacy for president by opening his mouth. I was not to excited about a party hopping rich businessman with a Napoleonic complex running for president anyway. This statement by him removes any possibility that he would have even the remotest chance of success. Like Fred Thompson, he would have done much better if he just kept his big mouth shut and said nothing. Maybe his script writers are on strike as well.<br /><br />Seems to me that this colonial like exploitation of cheap illegal labor is at the very root of our economic and social ills. But it's been a while since I was at the country club so maybe I'm out of touch with current mainstream American values. Are we now a caste society like India? We need a new generation of slave laborers to pick the cotton? Have we learned nothing since 1863? Oh - but the "beaner economy" of Bush and I guess Bloomberg is really cooking along now. Actually all of this open border, free trade, exploit the cheap working classes of third world countries comes right out of the think tanks of the CFR. So the modern day Robber Barrons have now transformed themselves into angels of light? J.P. Morgen and John D. Rockerfeller would be so proud to know that the dragons tooth of the CFR they created had grown into a full fledged beast that was, that is not and yet is ruining America and the free world.<br /><br />Oh but they are making so much profit so it must all be good, right? Well - not these days. The global economy is teetering on the brink of self destruction and Bloomberg's solution is to import more illegal labor. Apparently the first 20 million wasn't enough. I guess you just can't have to many greenskeepers. Rome was sacked a number of times before she finally imploded. How many times can America stand this kind of domestic abuse?<br /><br />I wouldn't have thought I could say this but Bloomberg's idea is an even more impotent economic stimulus than the new Bush tax cut proposal. Importing more cheap illegal labor? Isn't there a law against that? They ought to run him out of Gotham on a rail.<br /><br />Bloomberg has a history of being a global elitist - so it is nothing new. I have trouble relating to his mentality but then I don't play much golf.<br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49550"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Palatino,Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;" >Bloomberg: Illegals needed to take care of golf courses</span></a><br /></span></span><!-- end head --><!-- deck --> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Palatino,Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:78%;" ><span style="font-size:130%;">New York mayor: Fairways would suffer if undocumented immigrants sent home.</span><br /></span><br /><blockquote>Bloomberg: More Immigration Helps Economy<br />Wednesday, January 23, 2008 11:18 AM<br />By: Newsmax Staff<br /><br /><br />New York City Mayor and potential presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg says that welcoming more immigrants to the U.S. is the key to solving America’s economic troubles.<br /><br />“Our country has tried to look inward at the very time when we should be looking outward,” Bloomberg said at a press conference on Tuesday.<br /><br />“We should be trying to encourage the best and the brightest from around the world to move here and bring their knowledge, bring their capital, bring their spirit to expand our economy, and sadly, I think we are going in the other direction.”<br /><br />Bloomberg’s remarks echoed comments he made in last week State of the City address, when he praised immigrants’ role in the U.S. economy, the New York Sun reported.<br /><br />In that address, he also criticized “those politicians who, all of a sudden, have embraced xenophobia,” an apparent swipe at the Republican presidential candidates.<br /><br />The billionaire mayor said at Tuesday’s press conference that strong foreign markets will help drive the American economy.<br /><br />“We, for example, need an economy in China that is flourishing. We export a lot to China as well as import from China. We need to have a Europe that is growing — that’s where we send a lot of our exports. We need to have people from around the world come here.”<br /><br />The national scale of Bloomberg’s recent remarks about immigration, gun control and other issues has furthered speculation that he might run for president as an independent this year, according to the Sun.<br /><br />Adding to that speculation, Bloomberg met last week in Texas with Clay Mulford, who helped mastermind Ross Perot’s 1992 third-party presidential campaign.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Bloomberg:_More_Immigrati/2008/01/23/66717.html">http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Bloomberg:_More_Immigrati/2008/01/23/66717.html</a><br /><br /></blockquote></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-87513071455604448732008-01-18T14:17:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.291-08:00Clueless in Washington - It's the economy stupid!<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R5ERFsgs7BI/AAAAAAAAAH4/tq2DxgULWLU/s1600-h/Clueless_Bush.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R5ERFsgs7BI/AAAAAAAAAH4/tq2DxgULWLU/s200/Clueless_Bush.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5156921837861268498" border="0" /></a>Today the Bush administration finally acknowledged what many have seen coming for months - a recession. It reminds me of the fat lady that went to the emergency room complaining of stomach pains. Turns out she was having a baby. "Goodness me, how did that happen?" Not only did she not know she was pregnant but she couldn't remember how she got that way. The politicians come out with their thinly disguised phrases and platitudes. Fred Thompson called it a "slow patch". Doesn't really matter what you call it. The failure to deal with it speaks volumes of the incompetency of this CFR run government.<br /><br />Earlier this year on Jan 4th <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22505912/">Bush anounced</a> that:<br /><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22505912/"></a><blockquote>"Financial markets are strong and solid" and "this economy of ours is on a solid foundation, but we can’t take economic growth for granted,” Bush said. “And there are signs that will cause us to be ever more diligent and make sure that good policies come out of Washington."<br /></blockquote>At the same time <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/money/Merrill_Lynch_recession/2008/01/08/62650.html">David Rosenberg at Merrill Lynch announced</a>:<br /><blockquote>The U.S. economy has entered into its first major recession in 16 years according to David Rosenberg, chief North American economist for Merrill Lynch, who declared the downturn in a research note to clients released on Monday. Mr Rosenberg wrote: "According to our analysis, this [recession] isn't even a forecast any more but is a present day reality."<br /><br />He points to the four key barometers used by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NEBR) - employment, real personal income, industrial production, and real sales activity in retail and manufacturing. He wrote that these "seem to have peaked around the November-December period, strongly suggesting that we are actually into the first month of a recession."</blockquote>Clearly one of these people doesn't have a clue. Merill Lynch ought know as it was their irresponsible investment in the risky subprime market (as well as many other) has had a lot to do with this "rough patch". I think they've lost @15 billion so far.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R5ERdsgs7CI/AAAAAAAAAIA/0MpSCapsU4o/s1600-h/c_paulson_economy_080108.300w.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R5ERdsgs7CI/AAAAAAAAAIA/0MpSCapsU4o/s200/c_paulson_economy_080108.300w.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5156922250178128930" border="0" /></a>On January 8th the administration trots out <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22541546/">Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on CNBC</a> on a propaganda tour with a bunch of charts designed to convince people that the subprime mortgage crises really wasn't as bad as all that. Paulson had said in a speech in New York that the current housing correction was “inevitable and necessary” following five years of an unsustainable boom which saw sales and home prices hit record levels. What a joke these people are. No body is talking about investigating how this mess was created because they all are invested in it. Ed Kramer of Mad Money is the only one that seems to really get the level of fraud and dishonesty that is rampant in the good 'ol boys club of Wall Street and Washington and the FED these days. Business as usual.<br /><br />Now Bush comes out today talking about another massive tax cut needed to stimulate the economy? Do you mean for the ""financial markets are strong and solid" and "this economy of ours is on a solid foundation"? If it's so strong and solid why do we need a massive tax cut to try and jolt us out of a recession that doesn't exist? In just two weeks it has deteriorated that much? To be honest proposing that a tax cut is going to help solve the current financial crisis (which is what it is) is tantamount to malpractice - but then they are professional politicians with their hands deep in Wall Street's pockets.<br /><br />Now I don't have a problem with tax cuts but to suggest that they are going to solve this financial crises is silly. If Washington does not even understand the problem how can they fix it? The republican bobble heads will most likely soon all begin the tax cut mantra and I expect the democrats will also chime in - but only for the poor and middle class. How do tax cuts address the dishonesty and greed in the mortgage business? How do they address the ignorance of people that took out these subprime loans. How do they address the problem of illegals getting loans they don't qualify for to buy property they can't afford and really shouldn't own? How does it address the irresponsible actions of the FED under Greenspan which fueled this whole fake housing boom? How do they address the chronic problem of the government spending money it doesn't have for social programs we can't afford? How do they address the trade deficit which is the source of many of our economic problems.<br /><br />Until these real problems are addressed intelligently and free from political ideology we will suffer. There are many other factors to this problem. Inflation and the soaring cost of commodities food and fuel are just a few. Washington is corrupted by the same rot that is infecting Wall Street and our financial institutions and the FED. Profit without moral guidance or the limitations that it imposes on greed of corporate America. Well, Corporate America is running our government and we see how poor a job they really do.</p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-42998215296399836352007-12-11T16:47:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.295-08:00Illegal drug smuggling ring busted in Atlanta<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R2BYwcnmueI/AAAAAAAAAHo/_k30HOC-ftE/s1600-h/drug_bust_1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R2BYwcnmueI/AAAAAAAAAHo/_k30HOC-ftE/s320/drug_bust_1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5143208363796380130" border="0" /></a>Georgia has been identified as the new drug smuggling center for illegal drugs coming from Mexico through Texas. Interestingly Bush has done nothing to stop this nor has Michael Chertoff. Putting the DEA under his control is like asking the Mafia to police the Longshoreman. The recent bust is massive with 67 suspects apprehended. And yes they are all illegal aliens with connection to both Drug Cartels and Mexican gangs. Just another price Americans have to pay so the elite can have an open border policy that makes them richer.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span><h1></h1><h1><span style="font-size:100%;"><a href="http://www.accessnorthgeorgia.com/detail.php?n=204694"></a></span></h1><blockquote><h1><span style="font-size:100%;"><a href="http://www.accessnorthgeorgia.com/detail.php?n=204694">Feds bust drug ring that used Atlanta area as operations hub</a></span></h1><h1><span style="font-size:85%;">By The Associated Press</span></h1> ATLANTA - Federal agents this week charged 67 people, put a dent in two Mexican drug cartels that used the Atlanta area as a hub of operations and seized large quantities of cash, cocaine and assault rifles.<br /><br />Details of the multistate investigation were announced Friday as criminal complaints and indictments against the suspects were unsealed.<br /><br />Investigators said the arrests and seizures reinforce that the Atlanta area has become a hub for drug trafficking because of its transportation and telecommunications systems and its proximity to large U.S. population areas.<br /><br />"We'll make them pay by taking away their money, and we'll try to make them pay by taking away their freedom," U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said at a news conference where millions of dollars in seized cash and drugs were displayed.<br /><br />The charges were a product of investigations targeting two Mexican drug trafficking organizations that allegedly smuggled cocaine, methamphetamine and marijuana into the U.S. for distribution in Georgia, California, North Carolina, New York and elsewhere.<br /><br />The drug cartels cooperated with each other, authorities said.<br /><br />Authorities said the drugs would mostly be brought across the border into Texas and trucked to the Atlanta area for distribution to other parts of the country.<br /><br />Criminal complaints and indictments against the suspects were issued over the course of several days starting Tuesday, and authorities have since arrested many of the defendants, though some remained at large Friday.<br /><br />Charges against them include conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute a controlled substance. Nahmias said more charges were expected, and he added that the suspects would face significant prison time if convicted. Lawyers would be appointed to them if they didn't have their own, he said.<br /><br />Nahmias said investigators had not yet determined how many, if any, of the suspects were illegal immigrants. While most of their full names were provided Friday, in many cases their hometowns and addresses were not.<br /><br />A statement from prosecutors said 67 people were charged in federal court in Atlanta and that over the past several days 111 kilograms of cocaine, 17 pounds of crystal meth, roughly $8 million to $10 million in cash and at least 32 firearms were seized. Dozens of other people were arrested in California in an earlier but related investigation.<br /><br />An agent suffered an injured ankle while chasing one of the suspects arrested in Georgia this week, and during another arrest shots were fired and a suspect was injured, Nahmias said, without elaborating. The injuries to the agent and the suspect were not life-threatening, he said.</blockquote><br />Link to WSB video on this drug bust:<br /><br /> <a href="http://www.wsbtv.com/video/14801941/index.html?taf=atl">"Feds: Most Significant Drug Seizure Operation In Metro History Made - Video - WSB Atlanta"</a><br /><br />Thanks to Todd Walker of the Georgia Chapter of the Minutemen for this link!</p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-29591573057897818932007-12-11T15:52:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.299-08:00Jeanne Assam - The Lioness of Judah<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R1749snmuaI/AAAAAAAAAHI/G7OL4Tv1MFI/s1600-h/Jeanne_Assam_292.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R1749snmuaI/AAAAAAAAAHI/G7OL4Tv1MFI/s320/Jeanne_Assam_292.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5142821563336669602" border="0" /></a>In the aftermath of the two recent church shootings in Colorado, a real American hero has emerged. Anyone would be a hero in this situation but Jeanne Assam seems to be an unlikely heroine in the right place at the right time doing and saying all the right things. I couldn't help but be impressed by her poise, confidence and humility. We are grateful that she was able to end what surely what would have been a much more tragic situation. Though recent reports indicate the gunman took his own life, there is no doubt that she played the conclusive role in stopping his murderous rampage. She is my hero!<br /><br />This is a remarkable story of individual heroism. Her actions saved the lives of perhaps hundreds of people that morning. It was by her own recommendation that they increase security that fateful morning. That is being both attentive and obedient to God's will.<br /><br />Here is her testimony in her own words:<br /><blockquote>There was applause as Assam spoke to reporters and TV cameras saying, "God guided me and protected me."<br /><br />When asked by a reporter if she felt like a hero, Assam said, "I wasn't just going to wait for him to do further damage."<br /><br />"I give credit to God," she said.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R179JMnmubI/AAAAAAAAAHQ/Vw0S1AZaO5I/s1600-h/Jeanne_Assam.jpg_480X360.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R179JMnmubI/AAAAAAAAAHQ/Vw0S1AZaO5I/s320/Jeanne_Assam.jpg_480X360.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5142826158951676338" border="0" /></a>Assam described how the gunman, Matthew Murray, entered the east entrance of the church firing his rifle.<br /><br />"There was chaos," Assam said, as parishioners ran away, "I will never forget the gunshots. They were so loud."<br /><br />"I saw him coming through the doors" and took cover, Assam said. "I came out of cover and identified myself and engaged him and took him down."<br /><br />"God was with me," Assam said. "I didn't think for a minute to run away."<br /><br />Assam said she believes God gave her the strength to confront Murray, keeping her calm and focused even though he appeared to be twice her size and was more heavily armed.<br /><br />Murray was carrying two handguns, an assault rifle and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition, said Sgt. Jeff Johnson of the Colorado Springs Police Department.<br /><br />"It seemed like it was me, the gunman and God," she said.<br /><br />Assam worked as a police officer in downtown Minneapolis during the 1990s and is licensed to carry a weapon. She attends one of the morning services and then volunteers as a guard during another service.<br /><br />Boyd said Assam was the one who suggested the church beef up its security Sunday following the Arvada shooting, which it did. The pastor credited the security plan and the extra security for preventing further bloodshed.<br /><br />Assam said she was ending three days of fasting on Sunday when fate put her in the path of the gunman.<br /><br />"I was praying to God that he direct me" in what to do in life, Assam said. "God made me strong."<br /><br />Amid deafening cracks of gunfire, smoke-spewing canisters and the flight of thousands of New Life Church members, Jeanne Assam said she suddenly saw the hallways clear and a gunman come through the door.<br /><br />"I took cover. I identified myself. I engaged him. I took him down," the 42-year-old former law officer and volunteer church security guard said Monday at a news conference in the Colorado Springs police station.<br /><br />"I just said, 'Holy Spirit, be with me.' I wasn't even shaking," Assam said. "I give the credit to God. I say this very humbly. God was with me."<br />Assam, a member of New Life for only a few months, admitted she had been without sleep since Sunday's midday shootings at Colorado's largest church.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R179f8nmucI/AAAAAAAAAHY/-vdQP2tTtSk/s1600-h/Jassam_500.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/R179f8nmucI/AAAAAAAAAHY/-vdQP2tTtSk/s320/Jassam_500.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5142826549793700290" border="0" /></a>Assam said she had just ended a three-day fast Sunday. During the fasting she prayed and asked God to help her decide what to do with her future and whether she should work again in law enforcement.<br /><br />"I was weak," she said. "God made me strong. What was going through my mind is how awesome God is."<br /><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1414738208954661879"></a></blockquote><br /><br />Quotes are taken from the following two articles:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_7684728">http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_7684728</a><br /><a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/14817480/detail.html">http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/14817480/detail.html</a></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-48839811766166044672007-11-14T11:31:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.233-08:00Clinton damage control imposes its will on Gov. Spitzer<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/11142007/news/regionalnews/out_of_gas_eliot_putting_the_brakes_on_l_9236.htm"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Rzs0htOySyI/AAAAAAAAAGA/ivlXnfnIUjI/s200/Spitzerroadrage.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5132753954000751394" border="0" /></a>I read the following article with a certain amount of amusement. These politicians are such slow learners. Apparently the Clinton people realized this issue was spiraling out of control. That we could only be so fortunate. Damage control Clinton style. Having waffled on the issue at the debate, she then committed herself to supporting Sptizer's plan to give illegal aliens drivers licences in New York so they could register to vote for her in 2008. Now that has proven to be a disaster for her poll numbers in Iowa. So the only solution was to get Spitzer to back off his plan and eat some humble pie. They hope it will all blow over and the issue will fade. Wrong again Hillary! This is not the Iraq where you can vote against it after you voted for it. This is the critical issue for America. Are we going to be a sovereign nation of many sovereign states or are we going to import millions of slave laborers from Mexico to mow our lawns and pick our lettuce?<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Rzs6dNOySzI/AAAAAAAAAGI/8FzGJRt2AZY/s1600-h/Cintons.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/Rzs6dNOySzI/AAAAAAAAAGI/8FzGJRt2AZY/s320/Cintons.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5132760473761106738" border="0" /></a>She has shown clearly that she is for immigration reform. That means she is for importing slave laborers and giving them voting rights. The high reproduction rate of illegals insures the Democrats a majority at the voting booths across America. This is an inherent liability the gay lobby has not been able to overcome. Those gay couples don't reproduce very fast - go figure. And the no children urban yuppies don't help either. So it is obvious why panders like Hillary are falling over themselves trying to get illegal immigrant voting rights. I can only hope <a href="http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272617207.shtml">Wolf Blizter has enough courage</a> not to be intimidated by the Clinton people. Hillary has existed in a bubble since she first entered the national political scene in 1992. The press essentially acts as her personal staff doing their best to make her look professional. She is know by those who have worked for her as a tyrant. The recent <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/clinton.planted/index.html">revelations of her planting questions in Townhall meetings</a> and the <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/19/clintons-chinatown-connection/">mysterious generosity of poor Chinese immigrants</a> have added to the recent bad smell of her campaign. It takes a village of idiots to still believe that Hillary is an honest straight forward person that represents some real hope for change in America. Apparently they have quite a few of those villages in Iowa and Hew Hampshire.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RztHttOyS0I/AAAAAAAAAGQ/Atfw9kuRM4Q/s1600-h/Snake_Oil_Salesman.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RztHttOyS0I/AAAAAAAAAGQ/Atfw9kuRM4Q/s320/Snake_Oil_Salesman.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5132775050880109378" border="0" /></a>I can't help but wonder what was said to Spitzer to get him to back off this plan. Perhaps she sent him a picture of Vince Foster with a note that said, "think about it". Alas, we will probably never know the truth. Obviously he is their own personal political lapdog. In fact it was probably her people that got Spitzer to initiate the plan to get illegals registered to vote in New York for her in 2008. <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/12/bill-clinton-boys-getting-tough-on-hillary/">Bill has been very little political help for her</a>. It seems the late nights of coke and women are finally taking their toll on Bill's wits and nose! I look forward to the debate in Vegas, only to see if she has manages to intimidate all those "boys" in the press and media. We can only hope that what happens in Vegas doesn't stay in Vegas. I'm hoping for another performance like she had in Philly. She is starting to show some real weaknesses in her ability to handle some real political pressure. If the rest of the Democratic contenders are smart they will continue to gang up on her. Not that Barack O'bomber and pretty boy Edwards represent any kind of real alternative for America either. But if Russert or Blizter don't show up for work next week she will the number one suspect on my list!<br /><h1><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/11142007/news/regionalnews/out_of_gas_eliot_putting_the_brakes_on_l_9236.htm">OUT-OF-GAS ELIOT PUTS THE BRAKES ON LICENSE PLAN</a></span></h1>And poor Hillary Clinton still can't make up her mind. This latest statement completely contradicts what <a href="http://justbuildthefence.blogspot.com/2007/11/hillary-clinton-smartest-woman-in-world.html">she told Candy Crowley of CNN</a> just one week ago! The US Senate just took the biggest drubbing ever by the American people on this issue and she still doesn't get it? If she hadn't been so busy running fior president she might have learned something by the defeat of Shamnesty.<br /><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071114/D8STND5O0.html"></a><blockquote><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071114/D8STND5O0.html">Clinton Says No to Licenses for Illegals</a><br />Nov 14, 5:26 PM (ET)<br /><br />By DEVLIN BARRETT<br /><br />WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday came out against granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, after weeks of pressure in the presidential race to take a position on a now-failed ID plan from her home state governor.<br />Clinton has faced criticism from candidates in both parties for her noncommittal answers on New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's attempt to allow illegal immigrants in his state to receive driver's licenses. Spitzer abandoned the effort Wednesday.<br />"I support Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal," Clinton said in a statement. "As president, I will not support driver's licenses for undocumented people and will press for comprehensive immigration reform that deals with all of the issues around illegal immigration including border security and fixing our broken system."<br />Clinton stumbled when asked about the issue during a Democratic debate two weeks ago, and her new position comes the day before another debate where opponents are expected to raise the issue again.<br />Rival campaigns made clear they were not letting go of the issue.</blockquote><br /><br /><br />What a joke she is!!!</p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-76296023426832114752007-11-12T17:34:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.238-08:00Local 287g enforcement works in Georgia<p>The following video shows that the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Sheriff</span> Dept in Cobb County, GA is having some success doing the job that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Chertoff</span> and the Dept of Homeland insecurity won't do. While the illegal alien lobbies cry wolf, the fact is that enforcement of the law is effective. If the Law was enforced uniformly throughout the country, illegal aliens would soon find that the big candy store north of the border called the U.S.A., is not such a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">hospitable</span> place to "migrate too". Mexico will have to learn to fix their own problems instead of exporting them to America.<br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">287 g - Georgia Sheriff acts on illegal immigration</span></span><br /><blockquote><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CEDEAJtgTls&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20071116151324oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/CEDEAJtgTls&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /></blockquote></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-21099167533842220392007-11-05T23:23:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.253-08:00Hillary Clinton - Smartest woman in the world?<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzE_HtNh2WI/AAAAAAAAAFE/1Jstj6cEg0g/s1600-h/hillary-clinton-illegal-alien-drivers-license.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzE_HtNh2WI/AAAAAAAAAFE/1Jstj6cEg0g/s320/hillary-clinton-illegal-alien-drivers-license.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129950852179679586" border="0" /></a>In 1992 when confronted by the Flower's accusation of Bill's adulterous ways, Hillary said she wasn't a "stand by your man" kind of gal - but in 1998 there she was standing by her man who finally got caught red handed with Monica. Now she tells her Democratic rivals, "<a href="http://www.daylife.com/quote/023g4azgXM3Qh">if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen</a>." I find that very interesting because I never saw Hillary as a Betty Crocker type of gal either? I guess presidential ambitions trump the feminist liberation ideals of her formative liberal years at Wellesley. Long gone are the carefree braless summer days reading Lenin, Mao, and Friedan with Bill at Yale. Her political ambitions would also explain why she not only tolerated Bill's adultery but zealously defended him. He was after all her meal ticket to the Whitehouse. Now is that a marriage made in heaven, or hell?<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzFHlNNh2aI/AAAAAAAAAFg/GRwHOSnPsyY/s1600-h/art.clinton.bus.cnn.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzFHlNNh2aI/AAAAAAAAAFg/GRwHOSnPsyY/s320/art.clinton.bus.cnn.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129960155078842786" border="0" /></a>Here is my simple question for Hillary. If you are so smart why are you taking a position on Spitzer's plan for legal drivers licences for illegals that according to a <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071106/NATION/111050098/1001">recent poll 77% of Americans are against</a>? Well, she now admits, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/blogs/Yeas_and_Nays/2007/11/6/Hillary-I-wasnt-at-my-best-the-other-night">"I wasn't at my best the other night"</a>. So even the smartest woman in the world can have a bad night. But what was a bad night has now been extended into a bad week. According to Lou Dobbs <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/new_hampshire/election_2008_new_hampshire_democratic_primary">recent polls have her plummeting</a> 7% since the fateful debate when she was outed by the now<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/campaign-call-reveals-clinton-debate-concern-2007-11-01.html"> reviled Tim Russert</a>. Funny, I always thought of Russert was one of the good 'ol liberal boys in the media. He ought to be careful or he could end up swimming with the fishes like <a href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/FOSTER_COVERUP/foster.html">Vince Foster</a>, <a href="http://dangerouslogic.com/ron_brown.html">Ron Brown,</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/1998/03/16news.html">James Macdougal</a>, but I digress into the as yet unproven allegations that she had something to do with their convenient and untimely demise. Some say that Bill is the one that had them killed but I'll confess I've always seen the killer potential in Hillary. Cold hearted, cruel, calculating, corrupt, and cool headed are some of the more dominant characteristics I've seen in her over the years. And we have seen her lose her cool now haven't we!<br /><br />Pandering to illegals and "immigration reform" is political suicide for any politician of either party in America today - Massachusetts Kennedy fans(morons) excepted. In her recent interview with Candy Crowley of CNN, she stubbornly defended her support of the issue. She ought to consult with <a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54824">immigration flip-flopper John</a> (I never met an illegal I didn't like) McCain on just how unpopular an issue this is with the American people. It just killed his presidential bid. It will end hers too and rightfully so as it was during the Clinton years when illegal immigration went from a trickle to a flood. NAFTA, free trade and open borders were all Clinton policies. Free trade in humans too apparently "doing the work that Americans won't do." It is a losing issue of the ruling oligarchy of international bankers and business and the one world global elitists.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzH9xdNh2bI/AAAAAAAAAFo/-ZKJ3sf10T0/s1600-h/clinton_cleavage.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzH9xdNh2bI/AAAAAAAAAFo/-ZKJ3sf10T0/s320/clinton_cleavage.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130160476648495538" border="0" /></a>So you can't say she was just having a bad night. She is finally revealing her true chameleon nature. The veneer of her "noblesse oblige" has worn off. A chicken in every pot and <a href="http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/hillary-5000-for-every-baby-and-a-car-in-every-garage/">$5000 for every baby</a>. Flip flopping along like John Kerry and pandering to illegals like Bush. We already have a 'Panderer in Chief' in the Whitehouse. We don't need another. Within two minutes she was both for and against the Spitzer plan. Well, apparently now after consulting with her staff she has decided to come out for "immigration reform." Now there is a platform with real populist support! All I can say is, "you go girl." I'd also have to say she looked terrible tonight on CNN. With those baggy eyes, tight bitchy lips and strident tone she looked like she hadn't slept in a week. Apparently she has now forsaken the cleavage strategy that never could keep Bill's interest for a real winning issue like "immigration reform." She really hasn't got all that much going for her, with the exception of the MSM constantly lauding her and all that <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071101/ap_po/clinton_fundraiser_4">dirty campaign money being laundered through Chinatown</a>. Who would have guessed that she was such a draw with Chinese immigrants that can't speak a lick of English. And just how does somebody making $10 dollars an hour come up with a $1000 political gift for Hillary anyway? That some sacrifice! A real widow's mite.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzIIMdNh2cI/AAAAAAAAAFw/O-qmIMQJtjs/s1600-h/KATHLEENWILLEY.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzIIMdNh2cI/AAAAAAAAAFw/O-qmIMQJtjs/s200/KATHLEENWILLEY.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130171935621241282" border="0" /></a>And to add more fuel to the fire Kathleen Willey, former Bill Clinton fan, wants to pile on to poor Hillary too with her new book accusing the Clintons of killing her husband? Wow, just how far will Bill go to get laid? Do I see a pattern here? Can anybody connect the dots? Oh, the injustice of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy! Just how gullible are the Democrats? Just how desperate are they to return to power? Who could be dense enough to be fooled by this pair of Arkansas "white trash" love birds. But, there they go again and <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071106/D8SOFOJ84.html">Bill's recent feeble attempt</a> to defend his "wife" from being swiftboated seems to have backfired already. Oh - for the good old days when the Clintons could say anything and get away with it.<br /><br />O.K., I admit it. I don't feel sorry for them at all! Does that now make me a part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? Oh, I do hope so!<span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" ><br /><br />All I can say for Hillary is "You Go Girl"!</span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_B0uHybfmmY"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20071116151324oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/_B0uHybfmmY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Lou Dobbs rags on both Hillary and the Democrats</span></span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K3AUf7zUP00"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20071116151324oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/K3AUf7zUP00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-69250529913747332462007-11-04T16:03:00.000-08:002013-01-30T07:11:46.257-08:00Peter Schiff says 3.9% economic growth baloney<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzNn0NGKK7I/AAAAAAAAAF4/Up0PL05JXAA/s1600-h/dollardevalue.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RzNn0NGKK7I/AAAAAAAAAF4/Up0PL05JXAA/s320/dollardevalue.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130558547071478706" border="0" /></a>While I am usually reticent to write about economic matters in detail. Lacking a degree in economics and having only a elementary understanding of investment strategies I am hesitant to wade into this morass. In reality however only a little common sense is required to see the dire state of our economy and country. Those with the degrees are themselves the ones that have created this mess over the last 40 years. The masters of economics theories that are tethered only to an unprincipled lust for profit.<br /><br />The recent announcement of a 3.9% economic growth in the third quarter by our government seemed more than a little suspect to me. I have mentioned my concerns to many about our economic problems for months. In faithful conservative Republican circles I am often greeted with derision and hubris for even daring to mention that we are headed for some economic rough going in the not so distant future. As if the economy were itself some animated god impervious to the obvious laws of nature. Immune to the of cause and effect of mankind. Epithets like commie and socialist are often directed at me by the standard knee jerk Republican reaction to any type of real thought about our disastrous free trade and economic strategies. Some educated and some uninformed, all displaying a naive faith in an economic dogma that itself is flawed. Meanwhile, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7070935.stm">America's middle class bears the burden</a> on their way to foreclosure. The American dream is being bankrupted by destructive and foolish deficit economic strategies that only benefit the fat cats on Wall street. And soon they too will have to pay the piper.<br /><br />Peter Schiff of <a href="http://www.europac.net/">Euro Pacific Capitol</a> recently wrote an article detailing just how ludicrous the government claim of recent economic growth is. By fudging the inflation index they are able to claim growth in our economy that in reality is in recession. By any objective indicator our economy is shrinking not growing. So if the government thinks they can prop up this deficit economy with false numbers they are only fooling themselves and those still believe in our own government. Who on earth would still be that gullible and naive?<br /><br />I will post his entire article since he explains our economic situation much better than I can.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><blockquote><a href="http://www.europac.net/externalframeset.asp?from=home&id=10627"><span style="font-weight: bold;">The US Commerce Department’s latest numbers are meaningless</span></a><br />By:Peter Schiff<br /><br />Yesterday, as the US dollar fell to new record lows and oil and gold prices surged to new highs, the US Commerce Department delivered meaningless government data that managed to report the lowest US inflation in the last half century. Wall Street was hardly fooled.<br /><br />The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by 390 points, or 2.6 percent, to be followed down by Asian markets today. According to Bloomberg, the Morgan Stanley Capital International Asia-Pacific Index lost 1.3 percent to 170.10 as of 9:30 a.m. in Tokyo, falling from a record. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average declined 1.9 percent to 16,554.02. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 Index dropped from a high. All markets open for trading retreated<br /><br />These bizarre numbers were integral in allowing the Commerce Department to report 3.9 percent annualized GDP growth in the third quarter, which was heralded by the bulls as evidence that a resilient U.S. economy had shrugged off the problems in the housing and mortgage markets. However, the government’s ability to make “economic growth” magically appear is based purely on statistical finesse.<br /><br />To arrive at this rate, the government had to assume that inflation during the quarter ran at an annualized rate of .8 percent (that’s less than 1 percent). That is the lowest rate of inflation used to calculate U.S. GDP since the Eisenhower administration. With oil priced at almost $100 per barrel, gold futures trading over $800 per ounce, the dollar hitting record lows, and the Fed printing money like it is going out of style, the government has the nerve to claim that current inflation is the lowest it has been in half a century. Unbelievable!<br /><br />Just in case there is some confusion, the government adjusts nominal GDP gains using the GDP deflator, which represents the inflation rate during the time period being measured. This is done to strip inflation out of the GDP calculation so that only real growth gets counted: not nominal gains that result purely from inflation.<br /><br />The consensus estimate for 3rd quarter GDP growth was 3.4 percent. The reason we beat that number was that the government adjusted the nominal 4.7 percent gain by a mere .8 percent. Had the government assumed a higher rate of inflation, say 2.6 percent (identical to the rate used to deflate second quarter GDP,) the 3rd quarter gain would have been only 2.1 percent, well shy of the consensus forecast. My guess is that inflation is actually running at an annualized rate closer to 10 percent. Therefore using a more honest deflator, the U.S. economy is actually contracting, which would explain the recent anecdotal evidence provided by various economic polls, voter dissatisfaction and consumer sentiment numbers. In fact, if one simply measures U.S. GDP using gold or any other currency, it is clear that we are already in a recession.<br /><br />Similar illusions are created in other numbers, such as retail sales, corporate earnings, and stock prices, which are all rising merely as a result of actual inflation being higher than the official reports. For example, higher retail sales reflect consumers paying higher prices for the products that they buy. They may in fact be buying less stuff, but are paying more for it. Further, part of the gains result from tourists using their appreciated foreign currencies to buy products cheaper here than they can in the own countries. I have heard about Canadians checking into U.S. hotels with empty suitcases, crossing the border to indulge in weekend shopping sprees.<br /><br />Corporate earnings, particularly those of multi-nationals, are padded as their foreign currency denominated earnings translate into more dollars when those earnings are repatriated. However, such gains are illusions, as companies merely earn more dollars of diminished value for the goods they sell. The actual volume of exports does not necessarily improve much, as evidenced by weak industrial production and manufacturing employment. When those additional debased dollars are paid out as dividends, they confer no real increase in global purchasing power to shareholders.<br /><br />Similarly, just as inflation causes prices to rise for goods and services it causes stock prices to rise as well. Though such gains may be less than the actual increase in the cost of living, as long as the government gets away with using bogus CPI numbers which fail to fully reflect inflation, Wall Street takes credit for nominal gains as if they were real.<br /><br />However, as ridiculous as the phony GDP number was, yesterday’s biggest joke was a report on global competitiveness put out by the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, which ranked the U.S. economy as the world’s most competitive. To arrive at this conclusion, the forum has obliterated the obvious under a mountain of theory. In determining country rankings, the WEF weighed strengths in their "12 Pillars of Competitiveness", including: institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic stability, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labor market efficiency, financial market sophistication, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication and innovation. Completely ignored however are the measurable results of competitiveness, notably a trade surplus and a strong currency.<br /><br />It is as if the WEF decided to judge a weight loss contest without using a scale, by instead focusing only on mental attitude, dedication, perseverance, and nutritional education! As a result the prize is awarded to the fattest contestant. Based on the empirical evidence of a gargantuan trade deficit, staggering global indebtedness, and a declining currency, the United States is clearly not the most competitive economy in the world.<br /><br /></blockquote><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">I saw Peter Schiff on Glenn Beck last week. <a href="http://www.europac.net/Schiff-CNN-11-1-07_lg.asp">Here is the recording.</a></span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-w5pSm_BLGU&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20071116151324oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/-w5pSm_BLGU&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-4333391743492011712007-10-24T17:00:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.262-08:00The Late Great USA by Jerome Corsi - Book Review<p><blockquote>"The development of a North American consciousness will likely come from increased trade and investment among the three NAFTA partners."<br /><span style="font-size:85%;">-Toward a North American Community <a href="http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=events.event_summary&event_id=9959">Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars</a><br /><br /></span></blockquote><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://shop.wnd.com/store/images/items/B0950.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://shop.wnd.com/store/images/items/B0950.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>I just finished reading my copy of The Late Great USA, by Jerome Corsi. It is a good read and a fascinating look into the belly of the beast, so to speak, of the North American Union. I will admit that at first I was a little hesitant to read this book. Though I found the subject compelling I had an aversion to reading about it in depth. Perhaps I thought it would be boring - it was not. Perhaps I was afraid of what I would find out - I was not. I could not actually put my finger on what was causing me to procrastinate. Perhaps it was just that - procrastination.<br /><br />If you are concerned about the future of our great country then this book is a must read. Why? Because if you don't read it you will not fully understand what is going on in America today. I thought I did - but I found out many things I was not aware of. For instance I had no idea how the European Union came to be. I had read about it in the news at some point a few years back and thought to myself, "Well, that sounds like a great idea." Little did I know what it might portend for America. There are some very valid reasons to form the EU. The history of Europe's wars are a good one. There are none to form a North American Union, with the exception of greed and the insatiable lust for more power by the elite.<br /><br />Corsi begins by showing the motive and method for forming the EU. A fifty year plan that was fully realized some 22 years after Jean Monnet, the French architect and "father" of the EU had died in 1979. Through a well laid plan of stealth and slow incremental economic and trade agreements, the foundation was laid for the eventual EU and the Euro. It was discussed as part of an ongoing public policy debate in Europe over the years. So far there has been virtually no public debate on the NAU. In fact if anyone tries to bring it up they are immediately tarred and feathered as a conspiratorial nut and ridiculed and derided as delusional and paranoid. That type of response in and of itself ought to arouse suspicions as to the true motive and intent of the NAFTA/SPP/NAU agenda, which originated in the exclusive 'think tanks' of the CFR elite.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyIOTjGM5zI/AAAAAAAAABo/v83n318m5zA/s1600-h/spp_200.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyIOTjGM5zI/AAAAAAAAABo/v83n318m5zA/s200/spp_200.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125675054902601522" border="0" /></a>There numerous parallels between the formation of the EU and what is happening now with the so called <a href="http://justbuildthefence.blogspot.com/2007/09/open-borders-america-is-between-rock.html">Free Trade Agreement</a> of NAFTA and the more secretive SPP agenda. The EU began with an innocent Coal and Steel Trade Agreement between France and Germany in 1950. Fifty years later it had developed into a full blown autocratic bureaucracy centered in Brussels with a common currency. Nameless "working groups" of faceless bureaucrats now decide the fate of Europe. Though the crumbling edifice of an elected representative government still exists - in reality Brussels determines the fate of Europe. The Central Bank of the EU controls Europe now. Is this our fate as well? To be controlled by Banks of Wall Street?<br /><br />The method of the Bush Administration in pursuing this SPP agenda would have left Bill Clinton in awe. Word games, semantics and ambiguous definitions of what the meaning of is - is, characterize this less than forth coming administration. No wonder Bush gave Clinton a virtual blanket pardon when elected in 2000. Through carefully crafted "dialogs" that avoid the lawful process of Congressional oversight of treaties and legislation, they have forged ahead purposely avoiding any real public debate on this issue. Dishonesty, deceitfulness, stealth and denial are the methods of hundreds of "working groups". A shadow government that exists within the framework of our current Federal government. Appointed by Bush they utilize public time and taxpayer money to work on deceptively worded terms such as "harmonizing economic variables." <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/">FOIA</a> requests are the only way <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/SPP.shtml">Judicial Watch</a> has been able to pry the jealously guarded scraps of information from the mouth of this stealthy but ravenous beast. Nothing is revealed openly and like a great battle every hill seems to be contested by those dedicated to the elusive non-existent cause of the NAU. "Methinks the lady doth protest too much."<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyEQtjGM5wI/AAAAAAAAABQ/wazyeNQL5R0/s1600-h/Artist+RenderingTTC.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyEQtjGM5wI/AAAAAAAAABQ/wazyeNQL5R0/s320/Artist+RenderingTTC.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125396225625745154" border="0" /></a>The so called <a href="http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/006207.html">"urban legend"</a> but often discussed NAFTA Super Highway is a good case in point. This highway was mandated by the NAFTA agreement but now it mysteriously doesn't exist anymore? Now the Bush administration plays word games and semantics around the idea. I guess they think we are stupid. Meanwhile the <a href="http://ttc.keeptexasmoving.com/">TxDOT</a> moves forward with plans and land seizures and artist renderings like the <a href="http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/index.php/trans-texas_corridor">Trans-Texas Corridor</a> pictured here. They are subcontracting the project out to a Spanish firm (No not Mexican!), for an estimated cost of @$190 billion dollars. To add insult to injury Americans will have to pay tolls to the Spanish firm Cintra in order to use it! If it doesn't exist then just where is it coming from and where does it go then? What is it's non-existant purpose? They state very clearly that it is for bringing goods from China and Asia through Mexico and transporting them to the US and Canada. But we are suppose to believe it is not a critical part of a NAFTA Super Highway? Why through Mexico? No Teamsters Unions or Longshoreman Unions to deal with. No independent American Truckers. Less shipping costs and more profits for the multinational Corporations that are intentionally destroying America's economic and industrial strength for filthy lucre. The God of Free Trade is profit but "what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul in hell?"<br /><br />The Bush administration is starting to take so much flak that they've put up an official government disinformation site. The following was posted about the non-existent NAFTA Super Highway:<br /><blockquote>Myth: The U.S. Government, working though the SPP, has a secret plan to build a "NAFTA Super Highway."<br /><br />Fact: The U.S. government is not planning a NAFTA Super Highway. The U.S. government does not have the authority to designate any highway as a NAFTA Super Highway, nor has it sought such authority, nor is it planning to seek such authority. There are private and state level interests planning highway projects which they themselves describe as "NAFTA Corridors," but these are not Federally-driven initiatives, and they are not a part of the SPP.<br />-<a href="http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp">http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp</a></blockquote>Yea, sure it isn't and "these are not the droids your looking for" either! An interesting and very careful choice of words. So they admit it exists but they have nothing to do with it. Nothing could be further from the truth. NAFTA is a Federal initiative and so is the SPP. SPP is an extension or continuation of NAFTA, although they are trying to do an end run around the US Constitution by calling it just an "ongoing dialog," or "a process." If it were so good for America you would think that they would be very proud of it and want to take credit for it as politicians are often want to do? Interestingly they claim that these are just "private and state interests". So are we to believe that states decided to do this on their own with no input or oversight from the Feds?<br /><br />Even more troubling is the claim that this is a private interest. Who's private interest would that be? So big business is running the US Government? Is that what they are admitting? The <a href="http://www.stopthenau.org/FOIA.htm">NACC is advising the SPP</a> which is controlling our government? Private business interests take precedent over the national security in an elected representative government now? This is a morally corrupt group of people and they are not just Republicans. Don't think for a minute if Al Gore or John Kerry were President it would be any better. This process was started under Bill Clinton and it will probably be worse if Hitlary gets elected.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyEXNDGM5xI/AAAAAAAAABY/dVIzGdYXUJI/s1600-h/nasco.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyEXNDGM5xI/AAAAAAAAABY/dVIzGdYXUJI/s320/nasco.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125403363861391122" border="0" /></a>O.K., so maybe it's not a NAFTA Super Highway, maybe it's really called a <a href="http://www.nascocorridor.com/pages/ports_network/ports_network.htm">NASCO Super Corridor</a>? What difference does it make what it is called? That is not the point. It still has the same purpose. Just because it's a state or private interest doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Is the Bush Administration trying to claim that they have no interest in a project of this size? That they have no responsibility for it? That they have no Federal authority over it? What the hell are they doing running the US government then? They ought to fired for being incompetent and inept or better yet impeached. Interestingly this particular picture was removed from the NASCO site after they started receiving a lot of attention over it - but we still have a copy! The very idea of building a project of this size and magnitude without any Federal oversight is patently ridiculous and a flagrant lie.<br /><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"><br />At a NASCO forum </span></span><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">held on April 30, 2004 </span></span><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">in Fort Worth, Texas<a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/minetasp043004.htm"> </a></span></span><a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/minetasp043004.htm"><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta</span></span></a><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"> told the NASCO meeting:</span></span><br /><blockquote><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"></span><p><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">"The people in this room have vision. Thinking ahead, thinking long-term, you began to make aggressive plans to develop the <span style="font-weight: bold;">NASCO trade corridor – this </span><span style="font-weight: bold;">vital artery in our national transportation</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"> through which so much of our NAFTA traffic flows.</span> </span></span></p><p><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">"It flows across our nation's busiest southern border crossing in Laredo; over North America's busiest commercial crossing, the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit; and through Duluth, and Pe<f></f>ombina, </span>North Dakota, and all the places in between."</span></p><p><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">"And to our friends from Mexico who are here today, I say, 'Welcome, and get ready.' <span style="font-weight: bold;">Opening the border is of mutual benefit.</span>"</span></span></p></blockquote><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"></span><p><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"></span></span></p><p><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"><br />Just how is opening the border of mutual benefit to us? Oh excuse me, you meant mutually for the Chinese and your buddies getting rich off all that free trade? So if Mineta was not representing the Federal interests in this project - just who's interest is he representing? His big business buddies in NASCO? </span><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">His big business buddies in the North American Competitiveness</span></span><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"> C</span></span></span><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">ou<f></f>ncil (</span>NACC)? </span></span><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">Is that what Bush means by private interests? I have to wonder how the Bush Administration's denial fits into this very revealing statement. Even on Mineta's website his speech is titled:<br /></span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 700; font-style: italic;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"><br />"NORTH AMERICA’S SUPERHIGHWAY COALITION TRANSPORTATION FORUM"</span></span></p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyIhcTGM51I/AAAAAAAAAB4/tkWklTBThL0/s1600-h/Two-Worlds...jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyIhcTGM51I/AAAAAAAAAB4/tkWklTBThL0/s320/Two-Worlds...jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125696095947384658" border="0" /></a>But somehow Bush can send his SPP lackey Jeffrey N. Shane to Congress and tell us with a straight face there is no plan for a superhighway and it is an "urban legend." Mineta called the NASCO Trade Corridor <span style="font-style: italic;">"a vital artery of our national transportation."</span> Is he refering to the non-exis<fon></fon>tant NAFTA super highway or the "urban legend"? It sounds pretty Federal to me. After all he is part of the Federal government? More Bush word games. Mineta is out there lauding the project and his undersecretary Shane is in front of Congress lying about it - saying it doesn't exist and calling it an "urban legend". Where is the MSM on this one? <a href="http://www.fdrs.org/prophetic_one_world_government.html">Silent as Rockerfeller promised</a>. When Clinton was President, Republicans chaffed at his blatant lying. Have they now had a change of heart? A taste of power? <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT">Notice how Mineta calls it North America's Superhighway? Not America's anymore. North America - get used to it. More not so subtle SPP/<fo></fo>NAU jargon of Robert Pastor. Cors<fon></fon>i cor</span>rectly identifies CFR <fo></fo>member Pastor as the "father' of the idea of North American Union.<br /></p>Jerome Cors<fon></fon>i has an interesting literary background. Liberal Democrats still froth at the mouth for his part in "outing" John Kerry in the 2004 election with <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Unfit-Command-Swift-Veterans-Against/dp/0895260174">Unfit for Command</a>. So Kerry was a pompous fraud that kept wounding himself because he was to stupid to learn the safe range of the M79 Grenade Launcher. Get over it! He lied so he could get purple hearts awarded when he should have received a band-aid. Get over it! He lied to Congress and the American people about the war just to get into politics and make a name for himself. Get over it! He stabbed his own soldiers in the back by lying about them and comparing them to Genghis Khan. Get over it! We have bigger fish to fry here.<br /><br />It actually gives Cors<fon></fon>i a lot of credibility in my estimation because like myself, here is a guy that supported Bush in both elections. Once he learned the truth about the CFR <fo></fo> intention to create a North American Union and what was really behind our open borders and unofficial illegal immigration policy he did not hesitate to "out" Bush. So I consider him to be a true America hero for writing this book. Heck maybe GW should award him the Medal of Freedom. That is something Bush will surely never receive. Corsi pursues this touchy subject with an admirable measure of judicious restraint and objective analysis. All information is clearly documented and can be verified quite easily as I did myself on the important issues that I wanted to check.<br /><br />Is the plan to create a North American Union a product of paranoid conspiratorial delusion or a reality being put into action as we speak by OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS? Corsi provides the clear documentation needed to show that it is indeed a real plan. It seems the only real conspiracy is the one by those involved including the media to deny it. Those easily led and fooled will of coarse repeat the denials with little if no real thought or investigation. Blind partisan political loyalties take priority over the truth these days. Bushbots or Clinton clones, it matters not. Such is the sorry state of political discourse for many in America today. Future generations depend on us to be alert and vigilant. They depend on us to take decisive action to preserve America's sovereignty and destiny to be a beacon of freedom to the world. The elite would twist that into a beacon free trade under a One World Government that they control. That was not the intent of our founding fathers. Greed and the lust for money has twisted their loyalty and honor. Though they were born American they have no allegiance to America, our country, the home of the free and the brave.<br /><br />There is much more covered in the book and I highly recommend that you get a copy and read it.<br /><ul><li>Details of the NAFTA Free Trade fraud and ongoing SPP deception. </li><li>Funny money accounting practices that hide the magnitude of the real Federal budget deficits. </li><li>A Customs port in Kansas City built and paid for by American taxpayers and refered to as "Mexican sovereign territory. </li><li>Self destructive Free trade policies that hide the VAT (value added Tax) of other countries and are unfair to American workers and companies. </li><li>Massive trade deficits that are bankrupting America. </li></ul>These are just some of the critical issues covered in detail by Corsi. "The very future of our great country and destiny depends upon it. You can even <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0979045142/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-1478877-7286268#reader-link">read it on Amazon</a> as it is not out in paperback yet. I bought my copy at <a href="http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2116">World Net Daily</a>.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyIN0DGM5yI/AAAAAAAAABg/F_t47qc1aag/s1600-h/NAU3-presidents.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RyIN0DGM5yI/AAAAAAAAABg/F_t47qc1aag/s400/NAU3-presidents.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125674513736722210" border="0" /></a><blockquote>"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the <span style="font-weight: bold;">New America</span>."<br /><span style="font-size:85%;">- George W. Bush, candidate for president of the United States (August, 2000)</span><br /><br /></blockquote><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);"><br />God Bless America!!!</span></span></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"> Words and music by Irving Berlin</span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"> © Copyright 1938, 1939 by Irving Berlin</span><br /><br />"While the storm clouds gather far across the sea,<br />Let us swear allegiance to a land that's free,<br />Let us all be grateful for a land so fair,<br />As we raise our voices in a solemn prayer. "<br /><br />God Bless America,<br />Land that I love.<br />Stand beside her, and guide her<br />Thru the night with a light from above.<br />From the mountains, to the prairies,<br />To the oceans, white with foam<br />God bless America, My home sweet home.<br /><br /></div></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-89471673162019893352007-10-18T12:59:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.267-08:00Chertoff - the open border jerk-off<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.glennbeck.com/news/images/apuscg.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.glennbeck.com/news/images/apuscg.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Micheal <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Chertoff</span> has been working overtime recently - running his mouth again. An appropriate endeavor for a Harvard trained lawyer. He is quite good at it though - running his mouth I mean. It is that which comes out of it that I find so disturbing. O.K., I admit it - I find his picture quite disturbing as well. Some have even compared him to <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Skelator</span>. Just how did a Harvard trained lawyer that was appointed as a Federal Judge ever end up in charge of America's security in the first place? What were his qualifications for this important position? How did this clown ever get put into a position of being one of the most powerful men in America - in charge of our "Homeland Security"? Which begs the question - why is it called the Department of Homeland Security anyway? I find the term rather <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">un</span>-American, like intelligence or terror Czar. What are we like Europeans now? Homeland? Czars? These are not terms we commonly use in America or American politics - but they do use them in Europe. In the European Union for instance. Anyway, I'll get into that critical issue later in this post.<br /><br />Michael <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Chertoff</span> is an open border, pro-illegal immigration promoting <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">yappy</span> dog for his handler El <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Presidente</span> Bush. It is understandable why he has never had any experience in getting elected in politics. The mere sound of his snotty condescending voice incites reactions in me, which if acted on, would have me confined behind bars for the rest of my earthly life. So why do I find this pretentious<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2007/07/15/why-were-not-worried/">jerk-off</a> so detestable? Some claim that he is a perfect example of governmental incompetence and should be summarily fired (I would like to suggest perhaps he should be frog marched around Washington by Joe Wilson). Unable and also apparently unwilling to secure our borders and therefore America that would seem the prudent solution. But perhaps there is more to this "jerk-off" than first appears. Obviously our own open border panderer in chief has no intention of firing him. He is probably simply elated with him.<br /><br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Chertoff</span> inherited perhaps the most thankless job in America today. He certainly is not responsible for our broken borders. That mess goes back decades. Reagan tried to fix it with an amnesty bill in 1986 and failed. The enforcement measures were <span style="font-weight: bold;">never implemented. </span>Not only were the laws never enforced but they were watered down incrementally by liberal legislation under Bush, Clinton and Bush again. So we can't blame him for the problem - but we can blame him for not fixing it. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Chertoff</span> 's job description should be updated to read something like this. <span style="font-style: italic;">"Spend a lot of time and money convincing the American people that your really trying to fix our broken borders but don't do anything to actually close our borders and protect America and at all costs find anyway to obstruct the lawful implementation of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 and above all else <span style="font-weight: bold;">do not build a fence</span>."</span><br /><br />So now you see why <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Chertoff</span> is perhaps one of the most qualified people in America for this job. He has no intention of securing our borders or stopping illegal immigration. He has no intention of deporting illegals back to the country of origin. It is not that he is corrupt and incompetent. He is doing exactly what he is suppose to do - pretend that he is trying to stop illegal immigration while using every little Harvard lawyer trick in the book he can think of to actually increase it. Remember this, "jerk-off" works for a guy who has openly stated that he is against a fence and therefore against securing our borders. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2007/10/02/beck.chertoff.interview.cnn">His recent appearance on the Glenn Beck show</a> proves my point. He spent the entire time trying to convince us that he really is trying to enforce the law and build a fence but he is being obstructed by a "Federal Judge". Wow, I really feel your pain Michael. We, the American people, are the ones being obstructed by a former Federal Judge. This is a guy that finds more whiny excuses for why he can't do his job than a professional politician.<br /><br />Here are just a few of the jerk-<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">off's</span> recent illegal immigration statements that reveal his lack of real interest in enforcing our current immigration laws.<br /><em><blockquote> "Every time a Border Patrol officer is transporting a load of future housekeepers and landscapers to someplace to be returned, he's not looking for drug dealers or drug loads," <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">Chertoff</span> said.</blockquote></em>Commenting to Wolf <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Blizter</span> on the growing opposition to his <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">Shamnesty</span> Bill.<br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><blockquote>"Yea, well first I understand there's some people who expect ah anything other than capitol punishment is an amnesty."<br /></blockquote></span>And again commenting on the recent defeat of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">Shamnesty</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><blockquote>"I'm disappointed about the fact that there were some necessary tools which we needed to be able to do more than we can currently do in enforcing the law that were left on the floor of the Senate today," <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">Chertoff</span> said<span style="text-decoration: underline;">.</span></blockquote></span><a href="http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Emerging_Threats/Briefing/2007/08/14/chertoff_still_hopeful_on_border_reform/8240/#post">Here he is running his little open border <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">yapper</span> down in Texas.</a><br /><blockquote><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">Chertoff</span> told a border-security conference in El <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">Paso</span>, Texas, that <span style="font-style: italic;">his department was now faced with having to enforce immigration laws that not only pull resources away from dealing with security threats but also have a negative impact on agriculture and other economic sectors that have become dependent on illegal migrant labor.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Homeland Security found itself facing “a need to pursue people coming here (illegally) to work, taking time away from (pursuing people) who are coming here to do us harm” like drug smugglers and terrorists.<br /><br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">Chertoff</span> said he does not necessarily expect another vast comprehensive immigration package like the stalled reform bill. “It may take a couple of bites to digest,” he said.<br /><br />But in the meantime his department and other federal agencies “had no choice” but to enforce existing laws, with consequences that will be “quite serious for some sectors” of the U.S. economy, like farming.<br /></span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">"In the end, it's very hard to secure the border with only brute force," he said. "It can be done, but it's going to be a labor-intensive and time-consuming way to do it."</span></blockquote><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RxkPrdZdjMI/AAAAAAAAABI/UQBb6y9zH2Y/s1600-h/chertofflettuce.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RxkPrdZdjMI/AAAAAAAAABI/UQBb6y9zH2Y/s200/chertofflettuce.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5123143290410863810" border="0" /></a>What a joke! He's like a Sheriff claiming he doesn't have enough deputies to arrest a vandal because there might be some bank robbers out there somewhere getting away. If he doesn't have enough resources to do his job why doesn't he just go to congress and ask for what he needs? He is the very definition of non-enforcement. This is coming from our top Border Enforcement Officer mind you. Leadership works from the top down. How do you think the people that are working for him feel that are out there putting their lives on the life to secure our borders and keep America safe. Border Patrol Agents like Ramos and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19">Compean</span>. He actually states that he is for illegals coming here to work and to have to do something about it interferes with his real job of defending our borders from terrorists and drug dealers and gangs. And incidentally he also claims it will hurt our economy and cause us to send even more jobs offshore. <span style="font-weight: bold;">So he even admits that exporting American jobs really is bad for us </span><span style="font-weight: bold;">AND THEY KNOW IT! </span>What a bunch of lying hypocrites. This is just another pathetic excuse by him to avoid doing his job. If the border were protected we could stop them all couldn't we Michael? And explain just how our border agents are going to be able to tell a serial rapist or murderer from a lettuce picker or landscaper? And please Michael, don't tell me you going to do it with your "gut feeling."<br /><br />Is <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20">Chertoff</span> a Harvard trained psychic too? Here the jerk-off freelances in seasonal terror attack predictions. <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/7/10/205413.shtml?s=lh"> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21">Chertoff</span>: Hunch Terror Attack Coming</a><br /><blockquote></blockquote><blockquote>U.S. counter-terror officials are warning of an increased risk of an attack this summer, given <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22">al</span>-<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23">Qaida's</span> apparent interest in summertime strikes and increased <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24">al</span>-<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25">Qaida</span> training in the Afghan-Pakistani border region.<br /><br />On Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26">Chertoff</span> told the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune that he had a "gut feeling" about a new period of increased risk.He based his assessment on earlier patterns of terrorists in Europe and intelligence he would not disclose.<br /><br />"Summertime seems to be appealing to them," <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27">Chertoff</span> said in his discussion with the newspaper about terrorists. "We worry that they are rebuilding their activities."</blockquote><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/CARI.Chertoff.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/CARI.Chertoff.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a>So if anyone thinks <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28">Chertoff</span> is serious about stopping illegal immigration at our border I've got some swamp land to sell you down in Florida as well. He is serious about something though and that is the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29">SPP</span>/<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30">NAU</span> agenda of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31">CFR</span>. He has been one of the prime movers in the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32">SPP</span> talks. He is thoroughly briefed in the plan to establish an <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33">NAU</span> and open borders and free migration are a key part of this plan. So where does the creation of the Dept of Homeland Defense fit into all this? Well that is precisely why it is called "Homeland Defense". It is not called American Defense or U.S. Defense or anything that relates to the concept of American national sovereignty. The reason is that the plan for the Defense is a continental defense. That includes relying on the corrupt and incompetent Mexican Army for our national security. In other words they are trying to create a defensive perimeter around the entire North American Continent. So the use of the phrase and ambiguity about "Homeland Defense" is intentional. It could mean America as we thought or it could mean a North American Union in the future. It could include Mexico and Canada and they wouldn't have to paint new logos on all those cars again. Saving the U.S. Taxpayers money!<br /><br />Here are some statements by Robert Pastor a radical left-wing communist supporting university professor (imagine that), who is a passionate advocate of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34">NAU</span>. According to Jerome <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35">Corsi</span>, author of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36">NYT</span> bestselling book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Late-Great-U-S-Coming-Merger/dp/0979045142">The Late Great U.S.A.</a>, Robert Pastor should be considered the father or main architect of the idea of North American Union.<br /><blockquote>"What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which will mean that goods can move easily across the border. <span style="font-weight: bold;">We want a common security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of people within North America.</span>"<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >-Robert Pastor, Independent task force member, Council of Foreign Relations Independent Task Force on North America</span><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /><br />Overcoming the tension between security and trade requires a bolder approach to continental integration: a North American customs union with a common external tariff (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37">CET</span>), which would significantly reduce border inspections and eliminate cumbersome rules-of-origin provisions designed to deny non-NAFTA products the same easy access. All three governments must also rethink the continental perimeter. Along with the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38">CET</span>, they should establish a "North American Customs and Immigration Force," composed of officials trained together in a single professional school, and they should fashion procedures to streamline border-crossing documentation.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Most important, the <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Department of Homeland Security should expand its mission to include continental security</span> -- a shift best achieved by incorporating Mexican and Canadian perspectives and personnel into its design and operation."</span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from </span><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/2004/1.html">Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)</a><br /></span></blockquote><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" ><span style="font-size:85%;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">North American Union Traitors Include <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39">Chertoff</span>, Rice, Bush</span></span><br /><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-vda1KRF75M"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20071116151324oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/-vda1KRF75M" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />So just what does <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40">Chertoff</span> know about the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41">NAU</span> and when did he know it? I would expect that he knows a lot more than I do. It would certainly explain his pompous condescending know it all attitude towards America's rejection of his fraudulent immigration reform bill. He sees himself I'm sure, as the new Security Czar for a future North American Union. I understand now why they call it a Czar! It does not even bear a faint resemblance to our constitutional form of representative government. Congress has not been consulted nor have any treaties been ratified - yet the <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=/ForeignBureaus/archive/200708/FOR20070822a.html">"amusing jelly bean <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42">dialogue"</span></a> continues. The term dictatorial comes to mind. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43">Chertoff</span> has been present at all the important meetings and has played a pivotal role in advancing the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44">SPP</span> agenda. Immigration reform was the keystone of the plan to begin removing all restrictions for workers migrating to America. According to <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/7/9/140357.shtml"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45">Corsi</span> this was their first attempt to go public with the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46">SPP</span> agenda and it failed</a>. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47">Chertoff</span> was one of the architects of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_48">Shamnesty</span> and played a key role in not only it's authoring but in attempting to cram this down the throats of the American people. Carefully buried in the 1000 page bill were key sections that would have made the <span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_49">SPP</span> Agenda law</span>. </span>I don't remember anyone discussing that with the American people? Stealth and secrecy are critical to successfully fooling the American people. Slow but steady incremental steps are the key to their betrayal of America or as <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_50">Chertoff</span> puts it, <span style="font-style: italic;">“It may take a couple of bites to digest."<br /></span><span><br />This post from <a href="http://bearcreekledger.com/category/spp/">Bear Creek Ledger</a> shows <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_51">Chertoff</span> and the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_52">DHS</span> to be the go to guy in implementing the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_53">SPP</span> agenda. It is important to remember that without Judicial Watch filing and winning a freedom of information lawsuit none of this information would be available to the general public. Such is the deceptive and deceitful nature of the current Administration. If it was just about "harmonizing" trade agreements -why be so secretive? The obvious answer is it is about more than they dare say. It is about laying the groundwork for the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_54">NAU</span>.</span><br /><a href="http://bluecollarrepublican.com/blog/?p=1088"></a><blockquote><a href="http://bluecollarrepublican.com/blog/?p=1088">Blue Collar Republican</a> tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_55">FOIA</span>). This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_56">DHS</span>) Secretary Michael <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_57">Chertoff</span> describes responsibilities of the agencies within <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_58">DHS</span> in the execution of the <a href="http://bearcreekledger.com/2006/06/27/nasconorth-americas-supercorridor-coalition-to-build-super-highway/">Security and Prosperity Partnership (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_59">SPP</span>) agenda</a>. Remember <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_60">SPP</span> is not a treaty (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_61">thusly</span> does not allow any Legislative action) and has been signed by no official of the United States yet Secretary <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_62">Chertoff</span> is enacting <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_63">DHS</span> agencies to follow and execute directives issued by this agreement. <blockquote><p>According to the memorandum signed by Secretary <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_64">Chertoff</span>: “…The [Security and Prosperity Partnership] has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico, and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_65">DHS</span> [Department of Homeland Security] should now be driven by a single agenda: the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_66">SPP</span>.”</p></blockquote></blockquote><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://oneworldorder.info/myPictures/Nafta_Flag_sm.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 155px; height: 110px;" src="http://oneworldorder.info/myPictures/Nafta_Flag_sm.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a>There is no doubt in my mind that is why <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_67">Chertoff</span> was brought on board as Secretary of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_68">DHS</span> in 2005 by Bush. To be the point man in foisting this scam on an unsuspecting American public. He is a snake in the grass. Tom Ridge probably just didn't have the stomach for this kind of treasonous crap. Immigration Reform is the Trojan Horse they are using to promote their deceitful Security and Prosperity Partnership (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_69">SPP</span>). Under the banner of minority rights and the canard of racial persecution they hope to deceive America into allowing this further erosion and compromise of our national integrity. That they have been outed and temporarily stopped is a sign of hope for those of us who are real Americans and are intent on staying free Americans. But rust never sleeps and neither do the elite with their <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_70">SPP</span> agenda. Americans, beware of Greeks bearing the gifts of Free Trade agreements.<br /><br />So instead of being an incompetent big mouth, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_71">Chertoff</span> is really loyally serving who? Not the American people - that is for sure. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_72">Chertoff</span> serves the elite - big business interests and international bankers. He serves Bush who also serves the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_73">CFR</span> elite. He may make token public efforts at law enforcement but that is not his goal. His goal is a North American Union with open borders and unrestricted migration of cheap workers who will serve the interests of the bankers and industrialist who see Central and South America as an untapped source of endless cheap labor. <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070829/NATION/108290080/1001">He recently transferred 1000 ICE agents to Customs</a>. If he was really intent on enforcing our immigration laws he would be adding personnel to the beleaguered and undermanned ICE department, not gutting it.<br /><br />Michael Chertoff is an open border jerk-off. I can only conclude that Bush and the rest of his open border lackeys are the same or worse. They are betraying America's sovereignty with deceit and guile and fraudulent free trade agreements. As far as I'm concerned they are guilty of treason. What a travesty for America, at a time when we are attacked by terrorists and in real danger, we are betrayed from within by individuals with loyalties other than America. Criminally and with malice and deceit they use the very issue of our national security to deceive us and put in place a plan to rend the United States of America. It is a violation of their oath of office which every federal law enforcement officer takes. It is apparent to me now why I shudder at the sound of his reprehensible and deceitful guile and treason. Treachery thy name is Chertoff.<br /><br />Here is the oath which Bush and Chertoff and their open border lackeys are in complete violation of - not only in spirit but the letter of the law as well.<br /><h4></h4><blockquote><h4><a href="http://www.opm.gov/constitution_initiative/oath.asp">The Oath of Office and the Constitution</a></h4> <h5>Oath</h5> <p><em>I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.</em></p> <p align="right"><em>5 U.S.C. §3331</em></p> <hr /></blockquote> <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/flagwave2.gif"></a><blockquote><span><span style="font-size:100%;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/flagwave2.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 161px;" src="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/flagwave2.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a></span>"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">insidious forces working from within.”<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">-General Douglas MacArthur</span><br /><br /></span></span></blockquote></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-8943812858183185352007-10-10T15:03:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.199-08:00Fox spills the beans on the Amero to Larry King<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://wnd.com/images2/vicentefoxcnn.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://wnd.com/images2/vicentefoxcnn.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Vicente the Fox is making the talk show rounds promoting his new book, "our beaners still make better burritos than yours". OK, I'm just kidding! I don't even know the name of his stupid book and I don't care either! I don't know why he would even bother getting it published in English. Who wants to read that crap? Just because most Mexicans are too illiterate to read does not justify exporting that junk to America. We need a trade barrier and higher tariffs and a FENCE!<br /><br />I don't know if he was hopped up on Mexican drugs or what but apparently he was more antsy than a Mexican jumping bean and could not keep his big mouth shut about the Amero. Thank you Vicente. While generally I despise this Fop who comes into our sovereign country and parades around and shoots his mouth off like he already owns it. I have to express my appreciation for his spilling the beans on the plans for Amero. He might be an idiot but at least he is an honest idiot.<br /><br />So that ruins it for Bush and his cabal of NAU, open border, free trade liars. The amusing jelly bean dialog of the SPP seems to have expanded into an economic union and monetary union. A North American Union is the plan. Did Bush ever consider telling the American people what is going on? Does he just think that he can keep up the sham of free trade and open borders and illegal immigration forever? Like we are not going to be able to figure it out? Or does he think we just don't care? Like spoiled consumer addicts as long as we get our fix of cheap Chinese and now Mexican products we will be happy? Does he think we won't notice the 20-38 million Mexicans now living here and ruining our neighborhoods?<br /><br />And why is most of the MSM silent on this issue? Could perhaps Rockerfeller be right in thanking them for remaining silent on their plans? What are those plans BTW? Anybody? Anybody? If America doesn't wake up soon from her slumber we will no longer be a sovereign nation. But as long as I get my HD TV and new Nintendo I guess it really doesn't matter. And there are always endless reruns on TV to keep me from thinking as well. I'll just keep pretending that America is a free country. A democracy in a republic. A sovereign nation of many sovereign states. Give me some more <a href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/empire.htm">Rockerfeller Drug Cartel</a> pain killers and I'll just fall in line with the rest of the Republican Bushbots and pretend like nothing is happening to America.<br /><br />I have just one thing to say to America. Wake up or soon we will no longer be a free people. OK, I said and if you don't like it - tough. Go cry yourself a river on the banks of the Rio Grande as you watch the beaners swim by or is the correct political term now wetbacks? I get so confused by all that stuff. And God knows just how much more important that is than losing your country to the NAU of Rockerfeller and the CFR!<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"> Vicente the Fox on the Amero</span><br /><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gYGrn0hZlCQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="/web/20071011023022oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/gYGrn0hZlCQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br /><span style="color: rgb(68, 0, 0);font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;" ><b></b></span><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(68, 0, 0);font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;" ><b>PREMEDITATED MERGER</b></span><br /><!-- end standing head --><!-- head --> <a href="http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58052"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Palatino,Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:85%;" >Ex-Mexican prez: 'Amero' on the way</span></a><br /><!-- end head --><!-- deck --> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Palatino,Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:78%;" >Vicente Fox confirms long-term deal worked out with President Bush</span><br /><!-- end deck --> <hr style="font-size:78%;"> <span style="">Posted: October 9, 2007<br />1:15 p.m. Eastern<br /><br /></span> <span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"> </span><p> <span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"><span style="font-family:Palatino,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times,serif;"> <!-- byline --> By Jerome R. Corsi<br /><!-- end byline --> <!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------> <span style=""> <!-- copyright --> © 2007 WorldNetDaily.com <!-- end copyright --> </span> </span> </span></p> <!-- intelliTXT --> <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"> <span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"> <!-- Kontera --> <!-- begin bodytext -->Former Mexican President Vicente Fox confirmed the existence of a plan conceived with President Bush to create a new regional currency in the Americas, in an interview last night on CNN's "Larry King Live." </span><p><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">It possibly was the first time a leader of Mexico, Canada or the U.S. openly confirmed a plan for a regional currency. Fox explained the current regional trade agreement that encompasses the Western Hemisphere is intended to evolve into other previously hidden aspects of integration. </span></p><p><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"><a href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0710/08/lkl.01.html">According to a transcript published by CNN</a>, King, near the end of the broadcast, asked Fox a question e-mailed from a listener, a Ms. Gonzalez from Elizabeth, N.J.: "Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?" </span></p><p><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">Fox answered in the affirmative, indicating it was a long-term plan. He admitted he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas – a free-trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere, suggesting part of the plan was to institute eventually a regional currency. </span></p><p><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;">"Long term, very long term," he said. "What we proposed together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all the Americas."</span></p></span></blockquote><span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><p><span style="font-family:Palatino,Book Antiqua,Times New Roman,Georgia,Times;"></span></p></span></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-25356025610487279722007-09-29T15:37:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.205-08:00Open Borders - America is Between a Rock and a Hard Place<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Revelation 6:6, 14:8, 18:3,11</span><br /><br />..And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.<br />..And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city.<br />..For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.<br />..And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">"The economy is a tool to serve us. It is not a demi-god to be served by society."</span><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" > -Sir James Goldsmith</span></blockquote><span style="font-size:85%;"> </span></span><br /><a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20070920/capt.5e8f1bc20fd94065a5ddbb5e4f94bc70.pelosi_dcsw117.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20070920/capt.5e8f1bc20fd94065a5ddbb5e4f94bc70.pelosi_dcsw117.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>D<span class="inside-head">oesn't Nancy Pelosi look like a deer in the headlights? I've never seen a more stupid looking politician - with the exception of George Bush. This is a perfect example of how the American voter is in between a rock and a hard place these days. We've got the Republicans driving us into a ditch of economic ruin with an open border policy that just won't die. A factory export program that is second to none and a illegal labor import program to bring in cheap workers for the few industries we have left. Under the banner of Free Trade the Republicans are digging an economic ditch for America. The Democrats only solution appears to be to dig the ditch deeper. Not much of a choice there. America is truly between a rock and a hard place - and I'm not talking about the rock of Christ.<br /><br /></span><span class="inside-head">We need some fresh blood in Washington. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, and please, no more nitwits like Reid and Pelosi. Duncan Hunter is the only candidate I really like - and Tancredo - and they have been marginalized by the media. They know how to build a fence. Electing more Democrats to solve this problem is like opting to drive America's economy into a brick wall at 50 mph instead of the current 40 mph. That is the choice. Tax and spend Democrats or Tax-less and Spend-more Republicans. That is what I call being stuck in between a rock and a hard place without a good choice. Bush or Clinton? When it comes to open borders there is no difference.<br /><br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://mwhodges.home.att.net/debt.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://mwhodges.home.att.net/debt.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a><span class="inside-head"><a href="http://mwhodges.home.att.net/#debt">Deficit spending is ruining America.</a> Deficit spending is bankrupting America. Deficit spending is turning us into a slave nation of indentured servants by having us serve the private banks that are run by the Federal Reserve. There is nothing Federal about the FED. Talk about putting the fox in charge of the hen house. They are living high on the hog from the accumulated interest earned from America's debt. The deficit for the Federal budget is alone over 9 trillion dollars. 400 billion dollars a year is what the American taxpayer has to pay - just for the interest to that debt. Our entire <a href="http://mwhodges.home.att.net/nat-debt/debt-nat.htm">national debt is over 48 trillion dollars and soaring.</a> No - that is not a typo. Think about it. But Pelosi and Bush don't want to build a fence to protect our economy. They want to give away our economic strength and advantages to the Mexicans. Why? Compassionate conservatism? Liberal white guilt? Socialist ideals of income redistribution is more like it. It is easy for the elite to come up with plans like this. It doesn't affect their incomes. It is not coming out of their pockets. They are the ones reaping the big profits from exploiting third world countries in the name of Free Trade - the new economic world order. So the filthy rich get filthier and the poor get poorer.<br /><br />This is according to <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070701faessay86403/kenneth-f-scheve-matthew-j-slaughter/a-new-deal-for-globalization.html">Kenneth F. Scheve</a> a Professor of Political Science at Yale University and Matthew J. Slaughter a Professor of Economics at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth who also served on the White House Council of Economic Advisers from 2005 to 2007.<br /><blockquote>Globalization has brought huge overall benefits, but earnings for most U.S. workers -- even those with college degrees -- have been falling recently; inequality is greater now than at any other time in the last 70 years. Whatever the cause, the result has been a surge in protectionism. To save globalization, policymakers must spread its gains more widely. The best way to do that is by redistributing income.</blockquote>Unfortunately they recognize the economic problems due to globalization but fail to realize it is caused by the very trade policies they promote. Instead of fixing the real problem they opt for the typical socialist band-aid solution of income redistribution through even more manipulation of the tax code. Please - enough already with the taxes!<br /><br />Here former Mexican President Vicente the Fox, shares his vision of a North American Union with us.<br /><blockquote>"I'm talking about a community of North America, an integrated agreement of Canada, the United States, and Mexico in the long term, 20, 30, 40 years from now. And this means that some of the steps we can take is, for instance, to agree that in five years we will make this convergence on economic variables. That may mean 10 years we can open up that border when we have reduced the gap in salaries and income."<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >- Former Mexican President Vicente Fox (August, 2000)</span></blockquote>I hear you Vicente, loud and clear. "Soon the whole world will hear you". Reduce the gap in salaries and income. Open up that border. The intentional strategy to transfer wealth from the haves in America to the have nots south of the border by free trade and immigration policy. Economic variables? Isn't that the same line that the three Amigos used after the last SPP meeting on jelly beans in Quebec last August? It just goes to show that even though Mexico and Canada have different leaders now, it is the same open border agenda. Liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, Bush or Clinton, Fox or Calderon. It is the same old song and dance of the NAU. The new theme song of the New World Order.<br /><blockquote>"...We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a New World Order -- can emerge"...<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >-GHW Bush (September 11, 1990)</span></blockquote></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/James_goldsmith.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/James_goldsmith.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span class="inside-head">European multi-millionaire <a href="http://desip.igc.org/gatt01.html">Sir James Goldsmith</a> testified before the Senate Commerce Committee in 1994 on G.A.T.T.</span><span class="inside-head"> (General Agreements on Tariffs & Trade)</span><span class="inside-head">, which codifies trade agreements between countries under the auspices of the WTO or the UN. He described in detail how free trade agreements and globalization policies are simply a means to transfer wealth from America and industrialized countries to under developed third world nations. A redistribution of wealth on a global scale. A serious mistake. It becomes clear why they are pushing so hard for immigration reform. It is part of the plan to transfer our wealth to Mexico and South America.<br /><blockquote>"With the GATT, America will go from a trot — under the NAFTA — to a headlong gallop into total economic and social destruction."<br />"It must surely be a mistake to adopt an economic policy which makes you rich if you eliminate your national workforce and transfer production abroad, and which bankrupts you if you continue to employ your own people."<br />"Think again… one thing I pray you do. This is the single most important economic act the Western world has ever taken… it will change the life of every American." <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >-Sir James Goldsmith</span></blockquote></span><span class="inside-head">Here a few of the Marxist ideas of this <a href="http://www.sweetliberty.org/gatt.htm">new economic world order</a> proposed in the G.A.T.T. treaty. Suffice it to say it is unadulterated one world socialism.<br /><blockquote>"...(b) The broadest co-operation of all the States members of the international community, based on equity, whereby the <span style="font-weight: bold;">prevailing disparities in the world may be banished and prosperity secured for all</span>."<br />"All efforts should be made to reform the international monetary system with …the following objectives:<br />"(h) promote an increasing net transfer of real resources from [America] the developed to the developing countries;…<br />"IV (a) To formulate an international code of conduct for the transfer of technology [from America] corresponding to needs and conditions prevalent in developing countries…<br />"(e).... Preferential treatment should be given to imports and the exports of those [developing] countries;…<br />…all member States [including America] pledge to make full use of the UN system in the implementation of the present "Programme of Action", …in working for the Establishment of a <span style="font-weight: bold;">New International Economic Order</span> and thereby strengthening the role of the UN in the field of world-wide cooperation for economic and social development.<br /></blockquote>One world economic domination by the elite through the UN is what this trade treaty portends - all in the name of Free Trade. </span><span class="inside-head">The Communist maxim is: "From those according to their ability, to those according to their need". This statement from the NAU article, <a href="http://www.rejectthenau.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=23">Chertoff, Gutierrez, Rice: Plotting Bush's North American Union</a>, shows just how communist the idea of free trade can be. </span><span class="inside-head"><blockquote>Communist Manifesto author Karl Marx must be smiling. Speaking in 1848 to the Democratic Association of Brussels, Marx said, "In a word, the<span style="font-weight: bold;"> free trade system hastens the social revolution.</span> It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that <span style="font-weight: bold;">I vote in favor of free trade."<br /></span>In his Manifesto, Marx wrote, "The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationalities." Remember that this is the CFR’s goal, as noted in my first bullet. For decades, CFR members have dominated the administrations of our presidents, whether they call themselves Republicans or Democrats.<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span></blockquote>Notice Marx spoke to the Democratic Association of what is now the HQ of the all powerful European Union in Brussels. While the press writes of the EU in glowing terms those in Europe that are now subjected to the autocracy of Brussels are not so happy - realizing all to late they have lost their economic freedom and national independence. Not a good trade for the illusion of economic power. But that is exactly what the CFR proposal of an NAU is for America.<br /><blockquote>"For the first time, "North America" is more than just a geographical expression. NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America...<br />The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian interparliamentary groups into a single "North American Parliamentary Group." This might encourage legislators to stop tossing invective across their borders and instead start bargaining to solve shared problems.<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)</span></blockquote><br /></span><span class="inside-head"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Bush laughs at NAU conspiracy theories</span><br /><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lU3e8luD2Iw"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="/web/20071011023022oe_/http://www.youtube.com/v/lU3e8luD2Iw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />Recently, President Bush stated that he found these fears of an SPP/NAU conspiracy "amusing." <a href="http://judicialwatch.org/SPP.shtml">Judicial Watch does not find it amusing</a> and is calling for complete transparency and disclosure in the matter. Something the Bush Administration has so far failed to do. A new freedom of information lawsuit was filed on Aug 10 by Judicial Watch for the release of NACC influence on the Commerce Dept, which advises our government on the SPP process. Judicial Watch's complaint is that the <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/6376.shtml">"Agency’s Use of </a></span><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/6376.shtml"><span class="inside-head">NACC</span></a><span class="inside-head"><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/6376.shtml"> (North American Competitiveness Council) in Violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act"</a>.<br /><br />Our Panderer in Chief also shares his views of our blooming relationship with Mexico:<br /><blockquote>"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the <span style="font-weight: bold;">New America.</span>"<br />"Some still look at Latin America through old stereotypes."<br />"But I see a hemisphere of 500 million people, striving with the dream of a better life. A dream of free markets and free people, in a hemisphere free from war and tyranny. That dream has sometimes been frustrated -- but it must never be abandoned."<br />"Should I become president, I will look South, not as an afterthought, but as a fundamental commitment of my presidency. Just as we ended the great divide between East and West, so today we can overcome the North-South divide."<br />"But the ultimate goal will remain constant ... free trade from northernmost Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >- U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush in a campaign speech on the Western Hemisphere and Latin America, Miami, Florida (August, 2000)</span></blockquote>Free Trade and Globalization have become the Trojan horses of the New World Order. Under the guise of Free Trade they plan to spread democracy to a globalized economy. Or should I say impose? Now this all sounds well and good when you read about it in the news but what does it really mean for America?<br /><br />This is <a href="http://www.natall.com/national-vanguard/assorted/newworldorder.html">Dr. William L. Pierce's explanation:</a><br /><blockquote>In brief, it is a utopian system in which the U.S. economy (along with the economy of every other nation) will be "globalized"; the wage levels of U.S. and European workers will be brought down to those of workers in the Third World; national boundaries will for all practical purposes cease to exist; <span style="font-weight: bold;">an increased flow of Third World immigrants</span> into the United States and Europe will have produced a non-White majority everywhere in the formerly White areas of the world; an elite consisting of international financiers, the masters of the mass media, and managers of multinational corporations will call the shots; and United Nations "peace keeping" forces will be used to keep anyone from opting out of the system.</blockquote>This explanation from </span><span><span class="inside-head">Zbigniew Brzeninski </span></span><span class="inside-head">is a little more ambiguous but just as scary!<br /><blockquote>"The technotronic era involves the <span style="font-weight: bold;">gradual appearance of a more controlled society</span>. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values."<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >– Zbigniew Brzeninski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter and President Bush as co-chairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force; executive director of the Trilateral Commission</span><br /></blockquote>A more controlled society unrestrained by traditional values? Is that anything like Fasicm Zbigniew? And of coarse we couldn't leave out the "money changers" from the FED:<br /><blockquote>"A global economy requires a global currency."<br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">- Paul Volcker, Former Chairman, Federal Reserve, </span><a href="http://www.singleglobalcurrency.org/related.html">Single Global Currency</a></span></blockquote>Here is Alan Greenspan sharing his version of the commie income re-distribution plan with us in his new book: The Age of Turbulence - Adventures in a New World (Order?)<br /><blockquote>"He maintains that immigration reform, "by opening up the United States to the world's very large and growing pool of skilled workers," will help reduce the inequality of incomes.<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >- Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve (September, 2007)</span></blockquote>It becomes very clear that all these powerful men are in complete agreement about our future. In fact that is the very agenda behind our open border policy. The redistribution of our wealth to the poor countries of Central and South America. It is a diabolical plot that drives immigration reform. Why would we be worried about inequality of incomes except that they plan to create a community of North America or a North American Union. If Fox knew about it, who told him? Maybe Bush told him. Although Bush is not the one behind this plan. He is just working for them. Who is "them" - then? A very good question. They are a slippery bunch. But you can find them in CFR meetings. You can find CFR members in SPP meetings and think tanks on foreign policy. You can find CFR and Trilateral Commission members all through our government - especially the State and Defense and Commerce Dept.<br /><br />Well looky here! It's CFR day in the Oval Office. Notice how they all get along so very well. Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives. A regular bipartisan love fest. I'll give you a hint. It's just a game they play called politics. These are the men and women holding the reigns of power in America. Coincidentally they never have to elected. They are always appointed by the politicians we elect. They are never scrutinized by the press. It is a very unique arrangement that the CFR has developed. They have found a way to have power and control and influence in all areas of the Executive branch without having to be themselves elected. </span><span class="inside-head">A very convenient arrangement indeed. It is very communist.<br /></span><br /><span class="inside-head"><br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/CFR_Oval_Office.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 600px;" src="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/CFR_Oval_Office.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><blockquote>The Council on Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">- </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations, mentor to Bill Clinton</span></blockquote><span class="inside-head">We can't finish this expose of the New World Order without mentioning the "mother" of all Internationalists, David Rockerfeller. Without a doubt he is a key player in the scheme to de-industrialize America and render her impotent and helpless. A plan that has been many decades in the works. </span><span class="inside-head">The Rockerfeller family and money has intimately connected with both the <a href="http://www.councilonforeignrelations.net/">CFR and Trilateral Commission.</a> </span><span class="inside-head">Organizations whose stated goals are to create a one world government. The Rockerfeller family traditionally call themselves Republicans. They are certainly not Reagan Republicans. They are an elite family who figured how to take advantage of America's freedom and make lots of money. Some people really admire that. I'm not a Rockerfeller Republican. The ability to make millions without any regard as to the moral consequences of that gain is not an admirable character trait in my opinion.<br /><br />"No man can serve both God and mammon."<br /><br /></span><blockquote><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RwASu9ZdjKI/AAAAAAAAAA4/rcIECEW0jYU/s1600-h/225px-David_rockefeller.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_LKfc_M0pHG4/RwASu9ZdjKI/AAAAAAAAAA4/rcIECEW0jYU/s200/225px-David_rockefeller.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5116109774657522850" border="0" /></a>"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years........It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >- David Rockefeller in Baden-Baden, Germany 1991, thanking major media for keeping secret for decades the movement of the prophetic one world government.</span><br /></blockquote><span class="inside-head">The NWO are attempting to create an economy to be served by all. Build a fence and it will stop the NAU plans. Defeat the NAU and we will stop the NWO. Stop exporting America's industrial strength to poor third world countries and it will stop the NWO plan to bankrupt America. Stop spending money we don't have on government programs we don't need and we will stop the plan of the world bankers to make slaves of us all.<br /><br />We the American people have the power and can still stop this but we must wake up and JUST BUILD THE FENCE.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="inside-head"><br /><br /></span><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-28-pelosi-fence_N.htm"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="inside-head"></span></a><blockquote><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-28-pelosi-fence_N.htm"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="inside-head">Rep. Pelosi criticizes border fence</span><br /></a><br /><div class="inside-copy">EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called a plan to build fencing along parts of the Mexico border a "terrible idea" that overlooks local communities.</div> <p class="inside-copy">Pelosi made the comments during her trip to the Rio Grande Valley for the annual Hispanic Engineering, Science & Technology Week conference at the University of Texas-Pan American.</p> <p class="inside-copy">"I have been against the fence, I thought it's a bad idea even when it was just a matter of discussion," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "These are communities where you have a border going through them, they are not communities where you have a fence splitting them."</p></blockquote><p class="inside-copy"></p>And finally here is one last quote from David Rockerfeller, revealing who he really is and who he really is for. I can assure you - that is not America.<br /><p class="inside-copy"></p><blockquote>"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >- Quote from David Rockefeller's Memoirs (2002)</span></blockquote><span><span style="font-size:100%;"></span></span><blockquote><span><span style="font-size:100%;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/flagwave2.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 161px;" src="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eejwoodall/flagwave2.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a></span></span>"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">insidious forces working from within.”</span><br /><br />-General Douglas MacArthur<br /><br /></blockquote><br />Many of the quotes used here can be found at <a href="http://americansov.com/">Americans for Sovereignty</a> . It is an excellent site and source for info on the SPP/NAU, the Amero, and the NAFTA Superhighway.</p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-31454270645760340772007-09-16T19:00:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.211-08:00Greenspan reveals he is pro illegal immigration<p>Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the Fed and in the eyes of many one of the most brilliant people in the world, has been on a book selling media tour recently. While promoting his new tell all book, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World</span> (Order?), <span style=""><span style=""> </span></span>he has made a number of statements which have me questioning if he is senile or just really dumb.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/14/AR2007091402451_pf.html">The first statement of his that really irked me was this</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>He explains how an advanced economy hinges on property rights, the rule of law, a culture of trust, contracts, debt, reputation, self-interest and "creative destruction" -- the scrapping of old technologies and processes.<br /><br />He argues, for example, that the loss of manufacturing jobs in the United States -- from the steel, automobile and textile industries to computers and telecommunications -- "is a plus, not a minus, to the American standard of living."<br /></blockquote><blockquote>He maintains that immigration reform, "by opening up the United States to the world's very large and growing pool of skilled workers," will help reduce the inequality of incomes.</blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><br />When I read this I nearly fell out of my chair. Here is the justification for sending not hundreds but thousands of factories to China and Mexico. The loss of manufacturing jobs improves our standard of living? Not for those that lose their jobs. This last stuff is absolutely insane in my opinion. Reducing income equality? Sounds a like a socialist. I guess it didn't affect his salary though did it?<br /><br />So tell me O wise one. How do you improve the standard of living and reduce the inequality of incomes at the same time? His idea is apparently to outsource our factories and then import illegal labor to work in the ones we have left. Which by the way he calls a "growing pool of skilled labor". This is a man who completely out of touch with reality. Yea - when NAFTA ruins all the farms and small business left in Mexico, then you have a growing pool of unskilled peasants coming across the border looking for work. Meanwhile the average working American can look forward to a job in computers or telecommunications?<br /><br />So I see here once again why the SPP open border agenda is being crammed down our throats by a bunch or rich, wealthy, elitists who stand to make a lot of money from it. Why would we have to worry about the "inequality of incomes" in Mexico unless they had a plan to create a North American Union. So the master manipulators have to import millions of illegal immigrants to lower our excessive wages? Nice to know they care. So what does Greenspan know about SPP that he is not telling?<br /><br />Then he <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1.htm">states about the current Mortgage crises:<br /></a><blockquote><br />Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan admits he "didn't really get it" that the subprime lending trend was significant enough to hurt the economy until very late 2005, but still defends his lowering of interest rates from 2001 until 2004 that critics say caused the crisis in the first place. "While I was aware a lot of these practices were going on, I had no notion of how significant they had become until very late," he tells Stahl. "I really didn't get it until very late in 2005 and 2006." </blockquote><br />And then he goes and contradicts himself on the same issue:<br /><br /><a href="http://http//biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070916/nysu005.html?.v=97"><blockquote>While denying responsibility for the Mortgage and housing crisis. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan responds to critics who charge that the Fed contributed to the housing bubble and subprime mortgage mess by keeping interest rates low for so long, "This particular problem was an accident waiting to happen."</blockquote><br /></a>So which is it Alan? I don't remember him warning anybody about it in 2005 or 2006.<br /><br />Then he goes on to proclaim about his own legacy:<br /><br /><blockquote>"I'd like very much for people to say, 'Well, he caused all of that.'<br /></blockquote><br />O.K. that is exactly what I'm saying. You helped cause this mess. I guess in his mind that doesn't include the current mortgage crises which he admits he did not foresee. Or the recession of the late 90's and early 2000. Both of which critics attribute to his policies. It seems to me he is just a self serving individual trying to get back into the limelight and sell his book.<br /><br />And then he proceeds to endorse Hillary Clinton:<br /><br /><blockquote>"Very smart. She is probably everything that everybody says about her. She wouldn't be a bad president."</blockquote><br />And all this comes right before the elections of 2008. A so called Republican promoting Hilary and Bill. Coincidence? I don't think so. I think this Emperor has no clothes left.</p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-70276780417568346452007-09-15T02:42:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.215-08:00La Voz de Aztlan celebrates EPR and Al Qaeda attack on US<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/m/mx%7Depr.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/m/mx%7Depr.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a>The recent EPR terror attacks on Mexico's oil infrastructure went virtually unnoticed and unreported in the MSM. However the impact on the Mexican and U.S. economy is far from insignificant. In the recent article shown below, notorious MECha and Aztlan proponent Ernesto Cienfuegos, celebrates it as an attack on the US economy. With scarcely concealed pride he calls the recent EPR terrorist attack on Mexico's oil infrastructure an Al Qaeda success. Does he know something we don't know? He surmises that only someone that is an "experienced bomb maker" would be able to do this. He states that Mexico is worried about the sophisticated and much more powerful Improvised Explosives Devices (IED's) that EPR is now using.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.aztlan.net/">On his website</a> you can find links supporting two of the four insurgent/terrorist groups operating in Mexico. EZLN and the Mexica Movement. <a href="http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/mx_idx.html#guerrilla">According to this website</a> there are four main Indigenous and Guerrilla warfare movement groups in Mexico. The Mexica Movement is the only one that has not been implicated in any attacks to this point. They are currently involved in the recruiting in the US and run perhaps the best racist <a href="http://www.mexica-movement.org/">I hate white site</a> on the internet. They actively stage protest rallies and recruit the gullible on college campuses. They are especially active in California and Texas. Nice to know that at least they appreciate the liberty that our country allows them spread their Marxist propaganda.<br /><br />Popular Revolutionary Army (EPR)<br />Zapatist National Liberation Army (EZLN)<br />Zapatist National Liberation Front (FZLN)<br />Mexica Movement (Indigenous Movement of the People of Anahuac)<br /><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.aztlan.net/marcoscon2.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.aztlan.net/marcoscon2.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>The Zapatistas have been the most active in fighting the Mexican government in the '90's. A current state of truce exists officially since 2000 when Vincente Fox was elected. The EPR is thought to be connected to EZLN but for obvious political reasons they function as a separate group. They are the ones attacking the government today. Have they been trained by Al Qaeda as Ernesto seems to indicate? Does he know something because of his open connection to two of these groups seen on his website?<br /><br />The House report released in 2006 titled <a href="http://www.house.gov/mccaul/pdf/Investigaions-Border-Report.pdf">A Line in the Sand</a>, FBI Director Robert Muller confirmed in his testimony:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">"that there are individuals from countries with known al-Qa’ida connections who are changing their Islamic surnames to Hispanic-sounding names and obtaining false Hispanic identities, learning to speak Spanish and pretending to be Hispanic immigrants."</span><br /></blockquote><br />It also states that:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><blockquote>"Islamic radical groups that support Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamiya Al Gamat are all active in Latin America. These groups generate funds through money laundering, drug trafficking, and arms deals, making millions of dollars every year via their multiple illicit activities. These cells reach back to the Middle East and extend to this hemisphere the sophisticated global support structure of international terrorism. While threats to our nation from international terrorism are well known, lesser known threats spawned by narcoterrorism reach deeply into this country."</blockquote></span><a href="http://www.altereddimensions.net/crime/MS13Gang.htm"></a><blockquote><a href="http://www.altereddimensions.net/crime/MS13Gang.htm">The Washington Times reported on September 28, 2004</a>, that the notorious MS-13 gang had held meeting with the terrorist group, Al Qaeda. The meetings were rumored to concern methods of smuggling humans into the United States across Mexican borders. Police indicated that Al Qaeda had sought a partnership with MS-13.</blockquote>The question that needs to be asked is this. Is EPR receiving training from Al Qaeda? Is that where they have learned to build their more sophisticated bombs and IED's? Intelligence reports have suggested that Latin American terrorists are receiving training at Al Qaeda camps in North Africa. Could this be the result?<br /><br />Ernesto threateningly states that, "It would be much wiser for President Calderon to negotiate with the EPR" rather than hire Strategic Forecasting, Inc. for security. What is he a foreign policy adviser now? Is he an ambassador of peace for the EPR? Shall we sit down with the devil and discuss this. How long will it be until they bring their terrorism into Texas, into the heart of America? How long before they are openly doing Al Qaeda's dirty work in America?<br /><br />The Aztlan movement are open supporters of the Zapatistas and the Mexica Movement and from this article I can now safely assume EPR as well. So effectively they support all the Marxist revolutionary groups operating in Mexico and the US. Mexico is ripe for the revolutionary propaganda of left-wing socialist groups because of the economic problems and increased poverty and corruption in Mexico exacerbated by NAFTA and now the richest man in the world, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Slim_Hel%C3%BA">Mexican Carlos Slim</a>. To try and solve their internal problems Mexico is now exporting their Marxist revolution to America.<br /><br />And that same revolution is being imported into the US by the Bush Administration's implementation of the open border policies of the SPP agenda. Greed and pandering to big Business and Mexico seem to take priority over common sense and national security needs. The SPP agenda is in direct conflict with the overriding national security need to secure our borders. Six years after 9/11 the situation is actually worse. Yet Bush tells us he is protecting America by fighting terrorism in Iraq. Meanwhile he leaves continues to leave our southern border undefended and open to terrorist counter attack.<br /><br />And MECHa scuzzballs like Ernesto Cienfuegos only add fuel to the fire. Not a wise move GW. I consider Bush's actions to be criminally negligent and the incompetent Michael Chertoff deserves the same condemnation as well. Will the inability of the Bush administration to connect the dots lead to another horrific terror attack on the U.S.? I would hope not but it does not appear that they are currently aware of just how dangerous this situation is. It is imperative for our national security that we secure the border now. Not in 12 years. Not in 8 years. It needs to be done now. Duncan Hunter says he can build a fence from California to Texas in just 6 months. I believe him. That is why I support Duncan Hunter for President in 2008.<br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" >Mexican insurgents cause record $80 per barrel crude oil price</span><br /><br />Al-Qaeda's goal to collapse the US. economy appears on track<br /><br />by<br />Ernesto Cienfuegos<br />La Voz de Aztlan<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.aztlan.net/epr_flag.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.aztlan.net/epr_flag.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Los Angeles, Alta California - September 12, 2007 - (ACN) The new bombings of six facilities of Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) by the Ejercito Popular Revolucionario (EPR) early Monday caused the price today of U.S. light crude for October delivery to rise to a record $80.00 per barrel. At the same time the dollar fell to a new all-time low against the Euro. The 13-nation Euro rose to $1.3901 today, topping all previous records.<br /><br />A military spokesman of the EPR said that they placed 12 explosive devices each on 12 pipelines of Petroleos Mexicanos located at La Antigua, Ursulo Galvan, Omealca, Mendoza, Cumbres de Maltrata in the state of Veracruz and in Cuapiaxtla in the state of Tlaxcala. The explosives were detonated simultaneously at 2:00 AM on September 10. The EPR also carried out successful bombings of PEMEX facilities in the states of Queretaro and Guanajuato in July.<br /><br />The EPR has in the past condemned the Vicente Fox and the Felipe Calderon administrations for selling out Mexico's petroleum resources to US interests. They believe that Mexican oil revenues are being siphoned off by the super rich and are never used to benefit the desperately poor Mexican people. The EPR claims that this is one reason why millions of Mexican workers have been forced to migrate north of the border.<br /><br />The insurgent attacks have also caused massive losses in the Mexican economy. The industrial sectors have reported losses of over 200 million dollars since Monday. The lack of natural gas alone has affected over 375 large corporations in the states of Mexico, Puebla, Aguascalientes, Queretaro, Tlaxcala, San Luis Potosi, Michoacan, Jalisco, Guanajuato and the Federal District. Over 10,000 workers are presently idle. Many of these are already heading to the USA.<br /><br />Yesterday, work at the following auto plants was suspended: Volkswagen, in Puebla; Chrysler, in Toluca; General Motors, in Silao; Ford, in Cuautitlan; Honda, in El Salto, and over 100 suppliers of auto parts in various states are presently closed..<br /><br />In addition, steel industry representatives have reported that 60% of steel production has been halted due to the lack of energy caused by the EPR bombings of the PEMEX pipelines.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.aztlan.net/pemex.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.aztlan.net/pemex.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Mexico is the number two oil exporter to the US and as such figures greatly in the security of the country. Al-Qaeda has already made it one of their goals to starve the US of critical petroleum based energy in order to force the collapse of the economy. With this much at stake, the US Department of State has already made moves to assure the continued flow of Mexican oil across the border. The Calderon government has contracted with the CIA controlled SY Coleman Corporation based in Arlington, Virginia to provide security for the PEMEX facilities, something that could backfire on the PAN Party administration. It would be much wiser for President Calderon to negotiate with the EPR.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.aztlan.net/pemex_blast.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.aztlan.net/pemex_blast.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>In addition, the Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (Stratfor), through the US State Department, is now offering its services to President Felipe Calderon. Stratfor is supposedly a private intelligence agency founded in 1996 in Austin, Texas but insiders know the outfit as "The Shadow CIA". Stratfor analysts say that the EPR has "evolved greatly". They believe that the recent sophisticated operations by the EPR can not be the work of simple "campesinos". Stratfor says that they believe the recent bombings were led by very experienced bomb makers. They note that the recent operations against PEMEX have evolved greatly from what is usual for the group. The range of the attacks are much more widespread and are coming much more frequent. They are also worried about the much more sophisticated and much more powerful Improvised Explosives Devices (IED's) the EPR has been using.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.aztlan.net/mexican_insurgents_strike_again.htm">Original article</a></blockquote><a href="http://www.aztlan.net/mexican_insurgents_strike_again.htm"></a></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7776625900399669905.post-75586823096619812182007-09-12T14:57:00.000-07:002013-01-30T07:11:46.220-08:00Senate votes to block Mexican trucks test<p>Nice to know that the Bush Administration is so concerned for our <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">safety</span>. The American consumers are sick and tired of selling out our safety and security for cheaper products. We are losing jobs and factories and revenues to import cheap stuff from China that comes through Mexico. They only want to ship stuff through Mexico to avoid cost of doing business for the longshoreman and teamsters Unions. Are those idiots on strike again? You would think that they would strike for something other than higher wages. Apparently their corrupt leaders have been bought and paid for. Is there a shortage of truck drivers too now in the US?<br /><br />And six years after 9/11 the Bush <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Administration</span> pushes forward relentlessly to keep our southern border porous and open. No real security concerns from Mexican trucks. No way any bombs or terrorists could be inside them. I feel like I'm living in some make believe world of corrupt politicians.<br /><br /><blockquote>Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:51pm ET<br />By Kevin <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Drawbaugh</span><br /><br />WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate voted on Tuesday to block funding for a Bush administration test program to let Mexican long-haul trucks operate in the United States under 1994's North American Free Trade Agreement.<br /><br />One day after a fiery truck accident killed dozens in Mexico, the Senate approved an amendment to a transportation spending bill that would cut off funding for the test, which the administration authorized last week to run for one year.<br /><br />The House of Representatives has passed a similar measure.<br /><br />The White House on Tuesday threatened to veto the broad transportation bill because it would spend more money than President George W. Bush requested. It said the administration opposes any restrictions on the cross-border trucking program.<br /><br />The administration said "it has the necessary safeguards in place to ensure a safe and secure program."<br /><br />A tractor-trailer loaded with explosives blew up in a huge fireball on Monday after hitting a pickup truck in the northern Mexican state of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Coahuila</span>. At least 29 people were killed.<br /><br />Calling the accident a warning to proceed cautiously, North Dakota Democratic Sen. Byron <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Dorgan</span> led the effort to deny funding for the program. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Dorgan</span> questioned Mexican truck safety rules, as well as the handling of the test by the Bush administration, which he said "rushed to implement the pilot program late last week -- literally in the dark of night."<br /><br />He said the Transportation Department authorized the program too quickly, despite a report that found numerous problems with Mexican truck safety records.<br /><br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Dorgan</span> said the vote against the program was "a turning of the tide on the senseless, headlong rush this country has been engaged in for some time to dismantle safety standards and a quality of life it took generations to achieve."<br /><br />The pilot program involves both Mexican trucks operating in the United States and U.S. trucks being allowed to operate in Mexico, within limits on both sides.<br /><br /><br />Arizona Republican Sen. John <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Kyl</span>, defending the program in Senate floor debate, said the test would involve a maximum of 100 Mexican companies and 500 to 600 trucks on U.S. roads.<br /><br />"It is worth giving this program a chance ... It is much more efficient and much cheaper for American consumers if those Mexican trucks can travel in the United States," <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Kyl</span> said.<br /><br />Missouri Republican Christopher Bond said, "There is some strong support for allowing these trucks to run in the United States." He cited a letter of support for the program from agribusiness interests that said NAFTA promises the program.<br /><br />John Hill, an administrator in the Transportation Department, called the vote to block the program "a sad victory for the politics of fear and protectionism."<br /><br />Ohio Democratic Sen. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Sherrod</span> Brown compared pressure to open up U.S. roads to Mexican trucks to the kind of free-trade pressures that opened U.S. markets to tainted food and toys from China "because it serves multinational corporations."<br /><br />Brown said, "This pilot program doesn't make sense ... Too often in this chamber we write trade deals that ignore consumers and coddle corporations."<br /><br />On the overall transportation bill, the Senate approved on Monday an amendment providing $1 billion more for bridge renovations nationwide after last month's collapse of a span in Minnesota and fears that other U.S. bridges were unsound.<br /><br />© Reuters 2007. All Rights Reserved.</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote><br /></blockquote></p>Maxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07335144400183995976noreply@blogger.com