Chertoff - the open border jerk-off

Micheal Chertoff has been working overtime recently - running his mouth again. An appropriate endeavor for a Harvard trained lawyer. He is quite good at it though - running his mouth I mean. It is that which comes out of it that I find so disturbing. O.K., I admit it - I find his picture quite disturbing as well. Some have even compared him to Skelator. Just how did a Harvard trained lawyer that was appointed as a Federal Judge ever end up in charge of America's security in the first place? What were his qualifications for this important position? How did this clown ever get put into a position of being one of the most powerful men in America - in charge of our "Homeland Security"? Which begs the question - why is it called the Department of Homeland Security anyway? I find the term rather un-American, like intelligence or terror Czar. What are we like Europeans now? Homeland? Czars? These are not terms we commonly use in America or American politics - but they do use them in Europe. In the European Union for instance. Anyway, I'll get into that critical issue later in this post.

Michael Chertoff is an open border, pro-illegal immigration promoting yappy dog for his handler El Presidente Bush. It is understandable why he has never had any experience in getting elected in politics. The mere sound of his snotty condescending voice incites reactions in me, which if acted on, would have me confined behind bars for the rest of my earthly life. So why do I find this pretentious jerk-off so detestable? Some claim that he is a perfect example of governmental incompetence and should be summarily fired (I would like to suggest perhaps he should be frog marched around Washington by Joe Wilson). Unable and also apparently unwilling to secure our borders and therefore America that would seem the prudent solution. But perhaps there is more to this "jerk-off" than first appears. Obviously our own open border panderer in chief has no intention of firing him. He is probably simply elated with him.

Chertoff inherited perhaps the most thankless job in America today. He certainly is not responsible for our broken borders. That mess goes back decades. Reagan tried to fix it with an amnesty bill in 1986 and failed. The enforcement measures were never implemented. Not only were the laws never enforced but they were watered down incrementally by liberal legislation under Bush, Clinton and Bush again. So we can't blame him for the problem - but we can blame him for not fixing it. Chertoff 's job description should be updated to read something like this. "Spend a lot of time and money convincing the American people that your really trying to fix our broken borders but don't do anything to actually close our borders and protect America and at all costs find anyway to obstruct the lawful implementation of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 and above all else do not build a fence."

So now you see why Chertoff is perhaps one of the most qualified people in America for this job. He has no intention of securing our borders or stopping illegal immigration. He has no intention of deporting illegals back to the country of origin. It is not that he is corrupt and incompetent. He is doing exactly what he is suppose to do - pretend that he is trying to stop illegal immigration while using every little Harvard lawyer trick in the book he can think of to actually increase it. Remember this, "jerk-off" works for a guy who has openly stated that he is against a fence and therefore against securing our borders. His recent appearance on the Glenn Beck show proves my point. He spent the entire time trying to convince us that he really is trying to enforce the law and build a fence but he is being obstructed by a "Federal Judge". Wow, I really feel your pain Michael. We, the American people, are the ones being obstructed by a former Federal Judge. This is a guy that finds more whiny excuses for why he can't do his job than a professional politician.

Here are just a few of the jerk-off's recent illegal immigration statements that reveal his lack of real interest in enforcing our current immigration laws.

"Every time a Border Patrol officer is transporting a load of future housekeepers and landscapers to someplace to be returned, he's not looking for drug dealers or drug loads," Chertoff said.

Commenting to Wolf Blizter on the growing opposition to his Shamnesty Bill.

"Yea, well first I understand there's some people who expect ah anything other than capitol punishment is an amnesty."

And again commenting on the recent defeat of Shamnesty

"I'm disappointed about the fact that there were some necessary tools which we needed to be able to do more than we can currently do in enforcing the law that were left on the floor of the Senate today," Chertoff said.

Here he is running his little open border yapper down in Texas.

Chertoff told a border-security conference in El Paso, Texas, that his department was now faced with having to enforce immigration laws that not only pull resources away from dealing with security threats but also have a negative impact on agriculture and other economic sectors that have become dependent on illegal migrant labor.

Homeland Security found itself facing “a need to pursue people coming here (illegally) to work, taking time away from (pursuing people) who are coming here to do us harm” like drug smugglers and terrorists.

Chertoff said he does not necessarily expect another vast comprehensive immigration package like the stalled reform bill. “It may take a couple of bites to digest,” he said.

But in the meantime his department and other federal agencies “had no choice” but to enforce existing laws, with consequences that will be “quite serious for some sectors” of the U.S. economy, like farming.

"In the end, it's very hard to secure the border with only brute force," he said. "It can be done, but it's going to be a labor-intensive and time-consuming way to do it."

What a joke! He's like a Sheriff claiming he doesn't have enough deputies to arrest a vandal because there might be some bank robbers out there somewhere getting away. If he doesn't have enough resources to do his job why doesn't he just go to congress and ask for what he needs? He is the very definition of non-enforcement. This is coming from our top Border Enforcement Officer mind you. Leadership works from the top down. How do you think the people that are working for him feel that are out there putting their lives on the life to secure our borders and keep America safe. Border Patrol Agents like Ramos and Compean. He actually states that he is for illegals coming here to work and to have to do something about it interferes with his real job of defending our borders from terrorists and drug dealers and gangs. And incidentally he also claims it will hurt our economy and cause us to send even more jobs offshore. So he even admits that exporting American jobs really is bad for us AND THEY KNOW IT! What a bunch of lying hypocrites. This is just another pathetic excuse by him to avoid doing his job. If the border were protected we could stop them all couldn't we Michael? And explain just how our border agents are going to be able to tell a serial rapist or murderer from a lettuce picker or landscaper? And please Michael, don't tell me you going to do it with your "gut feeling."

Is Chertoff a Harvard trained psychic too? Here the jerk-off freelances in seasonal terror attack predictions. Chertoff: Hunch Terror Attack Coming

U.S. counter-terror officials are warning of an increased risk of an attack this summer, given al-Qaida's apparent interest in summertime strikes and increased al-Qaida training in the Afghan-Pakistani border region.

On Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune that he had a "gut feeling" about a new period of increased risk.He based his assessment on earlier patterns of terrorists in Europe and intelligence he would not disclose.

"Summertime seems to be appealing to them," Chertoff said in his discussion with the newspaper about terrorists. "We worry that they are rebuilding their activities."

So if anyone thinks Chertoff is serious about stopping illegal immigration at our border I've got some swamp land to sell you down in Florida as well. He is serious about something though and that is the SPP/NAU agenda of the CFR. He has been one of the prime movers in the SPP talks. He is thoroughly briefed in the plan to establish an NAU and open borders and free migration are a key part of this plan. So where does the creation of the Dept of Homeland Defense fit into all this? Well that is precisely why it is called "Homeland Defense". It is not called American Defense or U.S. Defense or anything that relates to the concept of American national sovereignty. The reason is that the plan for the Defense is a continental defense. That includes relying on the corrupt and incompetent Mexican Army for our national security. In other words they are trying to create a defensive perimeter around the entire North American Continent. So the use of the phrase and ambiguity about "Homeland Defense" is intentional. It could mean America as we thought or it could mean a North American Union in the future. It could include Mexico and Canada and they wouldn't have to paint new logos on all those cars again. Saving the U.S. Taxpayers money!

Here are some statements by Robert Pastor a radical left-wing communist supporting university professor (imagine that), who is a passionate advocate of the NAU. According to Jerome Corsi, author of the NYT bestselling book, The Late Great U.S.A., Robert Pastor should be considered the father or main architect of the idea of North American Union.

"What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which will mean that goods can move easily across the border. We want a common security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of people within North America."
-Robert Pastor, Independent task force member, Council of Foreign Relations Independent Task Force on North America

Overcoming the tension between security and trade requires a bolder approach to continental integration: a North American customs union with a common external tariff (CET), which would significantly reduce border inspections and eliminate cumbersome rules-of-origin provisions designed to deny non-NAFTA products the same easy access. All three governments must also rethink the continental perimeter. Along with the CET, they should establish a "North American Customs and Immigration Force," composed of officials trained together in a single professional school, and they should fashion procedures to streamline border-crossing documentation. Most important, the Department of Homeland Security should expand its mission to include continental security -- a shift best achieved by incorporating Mexican and Canadian perspectives and personnel into its design and operation."
- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)

North American Union Traitors Include Chertoff, Rice, Bush


So just what does Chertoff know about the NAU and when did he know it? I would expect that he knows a lot more than I do. It would certainly explain his pompous condescending know it all attitude towards America's rejection of his fraudulent immigration reform bill. He sees himself I'm sure, as the new Security Czar for a future North American Union. I understand now why they call it a Czar! It does not even bear a faint resemblance to our constitutional form of representative government. Congress has not been consulted nor have any treaties been ratified - yet the "amusing jelly bean dialogue" continues. The term dictatorial comes to mind. Chertoff has been present at all the important meetings and has played a pivotal role in advancing the SPP agenda. Immigration reform was the keystone of the plan to begin removing all restrictions for workers migrating to America. According to Corsi this was their first attempt to go public with the SPP agenda and it failed. Chertoff was one of the architects of Shamnesty and played a key role in not only it's authoring but in attempting to cram this down the throats of the American people. Carefully buried in the 1000 page bill were key sections that would have made the SPP Agenda law. I don't remember anyone discussing that with the American people? Stealth and secrecy are critical to successfully fooling the American people. Slow but steady incremental steps are the key to their betrayal of America or as Chertoff puts it, “It may take a couple of bites to digest."

This post from Bear Creek Ledger shows Chertoff and the DHS to be the go to guy in implementing the SPP agenda. It is important to remember that without Judicial Watch filing and winning a freedom of information lawsuit none of this information would be available to the general public. Such is the deceptive and deceitful nature of the current Administration. If it was just about "harmonizing" trade agreements -why be so secretive? The obvious answer is it is about more than they dare say. It is about laying the groundwork for the NAU.

Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the FOIA). This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff describes responsibilities of the agencies within DHS in the execution of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agenda. Remember SPP is not a treaty (thusly does not allow any Legislative action) and has been signed by no official of the United States yet Secretary Chertoff is enacting DHS agencies to follow and execute directives issued by this agreement.

According to the memorandum signed by Secretary Chertoff: “…The [Security and Prosperity Partnership] has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico, and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by DHS [Department of Homeland Security] should now be driven by a single agenda: the SPP.”

There is no doubt in my mind that is why Chertoff was brought on board as Secretary of DHS in 2005 by Bush. To be the point man in foisting this scam on an unsuspecting American public. He is a snake in the grass. Tom Ridge probably just didn't have the stomach for this kind of treasonous crap. Immigration Reform is the Trojan Horse they are using to promote their deceitful Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Under the banner of minority rights and the canard of racial persecution they hope to deceive America into allowing this further erosion and compromise of our national integrity. That they have been outed and temporarily stopped is a sign of hope for those of us who are real Americans and are intent on staying free Americans. But rust never sleeps and neither do the elite with their SPP agenda. Americans, beware of Greeks bearing the gifts of Free Trade agreements.

So instead of being an incompetent big mouth, Chertoff is really loyally serving who? Not the American people - that is for sure. Chertoff serves the elite - big business interests and international bankers. He serves Bush who also serves the CFR elite. He may make token public efforts at law enforcement but that is not his goal. His goal is a North American Union with open borders and unrestricted migration of cheap workers who will serve the interests of the bankers and industrialist who see Central and South America as an untapped source of endless cheap labor. He recently transferred 1000 ICE agents to Customs. If he was really intent on enforcing our immigration laws he would be adding personnel to the beleaguered and undermanned ICE department, not gutting it.

Michael Chertoff is an open border jerk-off. I can only conclude that Bush and the rest of his open border lackeys are the same or worse. They are betraying America's sovereignty with deceit and guile and fraudulent free trade agreements. As far as I'm concerned they are guilty of treason. What a travesty for America, at a time when we are attacked by terrorists and in real danger, we are betrayed from within by individuals with loyalties other than America. Criminally and with malice and deceit they use the very issue of our national security to deceive us and put in place a plan to rend the United States of America. It is a violation of their oath of office which every federal law enforcement officer takes. It is apparent to me now why I shudder at the sound of his reprehensible and deceitful guile and treason. Treachery thy name is Chertoff.

Here is the oath which Bush and Chertoff and their open border lackeys are in complete violation of - not only in spirit but the letter of the law as well.

The Oath of Office and the Constitution

Oath

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

5 U.S.C. §3331

---

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

-General Douglas MacArthur

Fox spills the beans on the Amero to Larry King

Vicente the Fox is making the talk show rounds promoting his new book, "our beaners still make better burritos than yours". OK, I'm just kidding! I don't even know the name of his stupid book and I don't care either! I don't know why he would even bother getting it published in English. Who wants to read that crap? Just because most Mexicans are too illiterate to read does not justify exporting that junk to America. We need a trade barrier and higher tariffs and a FENCE!

I don't know if he was hopped up on Mexican drugs or what but apparently he was more antsy than a Mexican jumping bean and could not keep his big mouth shut about the Amero. Thank you Vicente. While generally I despise this Fop who comes into our sovereign country and parades around and shoots his mouth off like he already owns it. I have to express my appreciation for his spilling the beans on the plans for Amero. He might be an idiot but at least he is an honest idiot.

So that ruins it for Bush and his cabal of NAU, open border, free trade liars. The amusing jelly bean dialog of the SPP seems to have expanded into an economic union and monetary union. A North American Union is the plan. Did Bush ever consider telling the American people what is going on? Does he just think that he can keep up the sham of free trade and open borders and illegal immigration forever? Like we are not going to be able to figure it out? Or does he think we just don't care? Like spoiled consumer addicts as long as we get our fix of cheap Chinese and now Mexican products we will be happy? Does he think we won't notice the 20-38 million Mexicans now living here and ruining our neighborhoods?

And why is most of the MSM silent on this issue? Could perhaps Rockerfeller be right in thanking them for remaining silent on their plans? What are those plans BTW? Anybody? Anybody? If America doesn't wake up soon from her slumber we will no longer be a sovereign nation. But as long as I get my HD TV and new Nintendo I guess it really doesn't matter. And there are always endless reruns on TV to keep me from thinking as well. I'll just keep pretending that America is a free country. A democracy in a republic. A sovereign nation of many sovereign states. Give me some more Rockerfeller Drug Cartel pain killers and I'll just fall in line with the rest of the Republican Bushbots and pretend like nothing is happening to America.

I have just one thing to say to America. Wake up or soon we will no longer be a free people. OK, I said and if you don't like it - tough. Go cry yourself a river on the banks of the Rio Grande as you watch the beaners swim by or is the correct political term now wetbacks? I get so confused by all that stuff. And God knows just how much more important that is than losing your country to the NAU of Rockerfeller and the CFR!

Vicente the Fox on the Amero

PREMEDITATED MERGER
Ex-Mexican prez: 'Amero' on the way
Vicente Fox confirms long-term deal worked out with President Bush

---

Posted: October 9, 2007
1:15 p.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox confirmed the existence of a plan conceived with President Bush to create a new regional currency in the Americas, in an interview last night on CNN's "Larry King Live."

It possibly was the first time a leader of Mexico, Canada or the U.S. openly confirmed a plan for a regional currency. Fox explained the current regional trade agreement that encompasses the Western Hemisphere is intended to evolve into other previously hidden aspects of integration.

According to a transcript published by CNN, King, near the end of the broadcast, asked Fox a question e-mailed from a listener, a Ms. Gonzalez from Elizabeth, N.J.: "Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?"

Fox answered in the affirmative, indicating it was a long-term plan. He admitted he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas – a free-trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere, suggesting part of the plan was to institute eventually a regional currency.

"Long term, very long term," he said. "What we proposed together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all the Americas."

Open Borders - America is Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Revelation 6:6, 14:8, 18:3,11

..And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
..And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city.
..For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
..And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

"The economy is a tool to serve us. It is not a demi-god to be served by society."
-Sir James Goldsmith

Doesn't Nancy Pelosi look like a deer in the headlights? I've never seen a more stupid looking politician - with the exception of George Bush. This is a perfect example of how the American voter is in between a rock and a hard place these days. We've got the Republicans driving us into a ditch of economic ruin with an open border policy that just won't die. A factory export program that is second to none and a illegal labor import program to bring in cheap workers for the few industries we have left. Under the banner of Free Trade the Republicans are digging an economic ditch for America. The Democrats only solution appears to be to dig the ditch deeper. Not much of a choice there. America is truly between a rock and a hard place - and I'm not talking about the rock of Christ.

We need some fresh blood in Washington. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, and please, no more nitwits like Reid and Pelosi. Duncan Hunter is the only candidate I really like - and Tancredo - and they have been marginalized by the media. They know how to build a fence. Electing more Democrats to solve this problem is like opting to drive America's economy into a brick wall at 50 mph instead of the current 40 mph. That is the choice. Tax and spend Democrats or Tax-less and Spend-more Republicans. That is what I call being stuck in between a rock and a hard place without a good choice. Bush or Clinton? When it comes to open borders there is no difference.

Deficit spending is ruining America. Deficit spending is bankrupting America. Deficit spending is turning us into a slave nation of indentured servants by having us serve the private banks that are run by the Federal Reserve. There is nothing Federal about the FED. Talk about putting the fox in charge of the hen house. They are living high on the hog from the accumulated interest earned from America's debt. The deficit for the Federal budget is alone over 9 trillion dollars. 400 billion dollars a year is what the American taxpayer has to pay - just for the interest to that debt. Our entire national debt is over 48 trillion dollars and soaring. No - that is not a typo. Think about it. But Pelosi and Bush don't want to build a fence to protect our economy. They want to give away our economic strength and advantages to the Mexicans. Why? Compassionate conservatism? Liberal white guilt? Socialist ideals of income redistribution is more like it. It is easy for the elite to come up with plans like this. It doesn't affect their incomes. It is not coming out of their pockets. They are the ones reaping the big profits from exploiting third world countries in the name of Free Trade - the new economic world order. So the filthy rich get filthier and the poor get poorer.

This is according to Kenneth F. Scheve a Professor of Political Science at Yale University and Matthew J. Slaughter a Professor of Economics at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth who also served on the White House Council of Economic Advisers from 2005 to 2007.

Globalization has brought huge overall benefits, but earnings for most U.S. workers -- even those with college degrees -- have been falling recently; inequality is greater now than at any other time in the last 70 years. Whatever the cause, the result has been a surge in protectionism. To save globalization, policymakers must spread its gains more widely. The best way to do that is by redistributing income.

Unfortunately they recognize the economic problems due to globalization but fail to realize it is caused by the very trade policies they promote. Instead of fixing the real problem they opt for the typical socialist band-aid solution of income redistribution through even more manipulation of the tax code. Please - enough already with the taxes!

Here former Mexican President Vicente the Fox, shares his vision of a North American Union with us.

"I'm talking about a community of North America, an integrated agreement of Canada, the United States, and Mexico in the long term, 20, 30, 40 years from now. And this means that some of the steps we can take is, for instance, to agree that in five years we will make this convergence on economic variables. That may mean 10 years we can open up that border when we have reduced the gap in salaries and income."
- Former Mexican President Vicente Fox (August, 2000)

I hear you Vicente, loud and clear. "Soon the whole world will hear you". Reduce the gap in salaries and income. Open up that border. The intentional strategy to transfer wealth from the haves in America to the have nots south of the border by free trade and immigration policy. Economic variables? Isn't that the same line that the three Amigos used after the last SPP meeting on jelly beans in Quebec last August? It just goes to show that even though Mexico and Canada have different leaders now, it is the same open border agenda. Liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, Bush or Clinton, Fox or Calderon. It is the same old song and dance of the NAU. The new theme song of the New World Order.

"...We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a New World Order -- can emerge"...
-GHW Bush (September 11, 1990)

European multi-millionaire Sir James Goldsmith testified before the Senate Commerce Committee in 1994 on G.A.T.T. (General Agreements on Tariffs & Trade), which codifies trade agreements between countries under the auspices of the WTO or the UN. He described in detail how free trade agreements and globalization policies are simply a means to transfer wealth from America and industrialized countries to under developed third world nations. A redistribution of wealth on a global scale. A serious mistake. It becomes clear why they are pushing so hard for immigration reform. It is part of the plan to transfer our wealth to Mexico and South America.

"With the GATT, America will go from a trot — under the NAFTA — to a headlong gallop into total economic and social destruction."
"It must surely be a mistake to adopt an economic policy which makes you rich if you eliminate your national workforce and transfer production abroad, and which bankrupts you if you continue to employ your own people."
"Think again… one thing I pray you do. This is the single most important economic act the Western world has ever taken… it will change the life of every American." -Sir James Goldsmith

Here a few of the Marxist ideas of this new economic world order proposed in the G.A.T.T. treaty. Suffice it to say it is unadulterated one world socialism.

"...(b) The broadest co-operation of all the States members of the international community, based on equity, whereby the prevailing disparities in the world may be banished and prosperity secured for all."
"All efforts should be made to reform the international monetary system with …the following objectives:
"(h) promote an increasing net transfer of real resources from [America] the developed to the developing countries;…
"IV (a) To formulate an international code of conduct for the transfer of technology [from America] corresponding to needs and conditions prevalent in developing countries…
"(e).... Preferential treatment should be given to imports and the exports of those [developing] countries;…
…all member States [including America] pledge to make full use of the UN system in the implementation of the present "Programme of Action", …in working for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and thereby strengthening the role of the UN in the field of world-wide cooperation for economic and social development.

One world economic domination by the elite through the UN is what this trade treaty portends - all in the name of Free Trade. The Communist maxim is: "From those according to their ability, to those according to their need". This statement from the NAU article, Chertoff, Gutierrez, Rice: Plotting Bush's North American Union, shows just how communist the idea of free trade can be.

Communist Manifesto author Karl Marx must be smiling. Speaking in 1848 to the Democratic Association of Brussels, Marx said, "In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade."
In his Manifesto, Marx wrote, "The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationalities." Remember that this is the CFR’s goal, as noted in my first bullet. For decades, CFR members have dominated the administrations of our presidents, whether they call themselves Republicans or Democrats.

Notice Marx spoke to the Democratic Association of what is now the HQ of the all powerful European Union in Brussels. While the press writes of the EU in glowing terms those in Europe that are now subjected to the autocracy of Brussels are not so happy - realizing all to late they have lost their economic freedom and national independence. Not a good trade for the illusion of economic power. But that is exactly what the CFR proposal of an NAU is for America.

"For the first time, "North America" is more than just a geographical expression. NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America...
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian interparliamentary groups into a single "North American Parliamentary Group." This might encourage legislators to stop tossing invective across their borders and instead start bargaining to solve shared problems.
- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)

Bush laughs at NAU conspiracy theories


Recently, President Bush stated that he found these fears of an SPP/NAU conspiracy "amusing." Judicial Watch does not find it amusing and is calling for complete transparency and disclosure in the matter. Something the Bush Administration has so far failed to do. A new freedom of information lawsuit was filed on Aug 10 by Judicial Watch for the release of NACC influence on the Commerce Dept, which advises our government on the SPP process. Judicial Watch's complaint is that the "Agency’s Use of NACC (North American Competitiveness Council) in Violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act".

Our Panderer in Chief also shares his views of our blooming relationship with Mexico:

"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the New America."
"Some still look at Latin America through old stereotypes."
"But I see a hemisphere of 500 million people, striving with the dream of a better life. A dream of free markets and free people, in a hemisphere free from war and tyranny. That dream has sometimes been frustrated -- but it must never be abandoned."
"Should I become president, I will look South, not as an afterthought, but as a fundamental commitment of my presidency. Just as we ended the great divide between East and West, so today we can overcome the North-South divide."
"But the ultimate goal will remain constant ... free trade from northernmost Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."
- U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush in a campaign speech on the Western Hemisphere and Latin America, Miami, Florida (August, 2000)

Free Trade and Globalization have become the Trojan horses of the New World Order. Under the guise of Free Trade they plan to spread democracy to a globalized economy. Or should I say impose? Now this all sounds well and good when you read about it in the news but what does it really mean for America?

This is Dr. William L. Pierce's explanation:

In brief, it is a utopian system in which the U.S. economy (along with the economy of every other nation) will be "globalized"; the wage levels of U.S. and European workers will be brought down to those of workers in the Third World; national boundaries will for all practical purposes cease to exist; an increased flow of Third World immigrants into the United States and Europe will have produced a non-White majority everywhere in the formerly White areas of the world; an elite consisting of international financiers, the masters of the mass media, and managers of multinational corporations will call the shots; and United Nations "peace keeping" forces will be used to keep anyone from opting out of the system.

This explanation from Zbigniew Brzeninski is a little more ambiguous but just as scary!

"The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values."
– Zbigniew Brzeninski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter and President Bush as co-chairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force; executive director of the Trilateral Commission

A more controlled society unrestrained by traditional values? Is that anything like Fasicm Zbigniew? And of coarse we couldn't leave out the "money changers" from the FED:

"A global economy requires a global currency."
- Paul Volcker, Former Chairman, Federal Reserve, Single Global Currency

Here is Alan Greenspan sharing his version of the commie income re-distribution plan with us in his new book: The Age of Turbulence - Adventures in a New World (Order?)

"He maintains that immigration reform, "by opening up the United States to the world's very large and growing pool of skilled workers," will help reduce the inequality of incomes.
- Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve (September, 2007)

It becomes very clear that all these powerful men are in complete agreement about our future. In fact that is the very agenda behind our open border policy. The redistribution of our wealth to the poor countries of Central and South America. It is a diabolical plot that drives immigration reform. Why would we be worried about inequality of incomes except that they plan to create a community of North America or a North American Union. If Fox knew about it, who told him? Maybe Bush told him. Although Bush is not the one behind this plan. He is just working for them. Who is "them" - then? A very good question. They are a slippery bunch. But you can find them in CFR meetings. You can find CFR members in SPP meetings and think tanks on foreign policy. You can find CFR and Trilateral Commission members all through our government - especially the State and Defense and Commerce Dept.

Well looky here! It's CFR day in the Oval Office. Notice how they all get along so very well. Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives. A regular bipartisan love fest. I'll give you a hint. It's just a game they play called politics. These are the men and women holding the reigns of power in America. Coincidentally they never have to elected. They are always appointed by the politicians we elect. They are never scrutinized by the press. It is a very unique arrangement that the CFR has developed. They have found a way to have power and control and influence in all areas of the Executive branch without having to be themselves elected. A very convenient arrangement indeed. It is very communist.

The Council on Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
- Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations, mentor to Bill Clinton

We can't finish this expose of the New World Order without mentioning the "mother" of all Internationalists, David Rockerfeller. Without a doubt he is a key player in the scheme to de-industrialize America and render her impotent and helpless. A plan that has been many decades in the works. The Rockerfeller family and money has intimately connected with both the CFR and Trilateral Commission. Organizations whose stated goals are to create a one world government. The Rockerfeller family traditionally call themselves Republicans. They are certainly not Reagan Republicans. They are an elite family who figured how to take advantage of America's freedom and make lots of money. Some people really admire that. I'm not a Rockerfeller Republican. The ability to make millions without any regard as to the moral consequences of that gain is not an admirable character trait in my opinion.

"No man can serve both God and mammon."

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years........It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

- David Rockefeller in Baden-Baden, Germany 1991, thanking major media for keeping secret for decades the movement of the prophetic one world government.

The NWO are attempting to create an economy to be served by all. Build a fence and it will stop the NAU plans. Defeat the NAU and we will stop the NWO. Stop exporting America's industrial strength to poor third world countries and it will stop the NWO plan to bankrupt America. Stop spending money we don't have on government programs we don't need and we will stop the plan of the world bankers to make slaves of us all.

We the American people have the power and can still stop this but we must wake up and JUST BUILD THE FENCE.

Rep. Pelosi criticizes border fence

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called a plan to build fencing along parts of the Mexico border a "terrible idea" that overlooks local communities.

Pelosi made the comments during her trip to the Rio Grande Valley for the annual Hispanic Engineering, Science & Technology Week conference at the University of Texas-Pan American.

"I have been against the fence, I thought it's a bad idea even when it was just a matter of discussion," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "These are communities where you have a border going through them, they are not communities where you have a fence splitting them."

And finally here is one last quote from David Rockerfeller, revealing who he really is and who he really is for. I can assure you - that is not America.

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- Quote from David Rockefeller's Memoirs (2002)

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

-General Douglas MacArthur

Many of the quotes used here can be found at Americans for Sovereignty . It is an excellent site and source for info on the SPP/NAU, the Amero, and the NAFTA Superhighway.