Saturday, September 29, 2007

Open Borders - America is Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Revelation 6:6, 14:8, 18:3,11

..And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
..And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city.
..For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
..And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

"The economy is a tool to serve us. It is not a demi-god to be served by society."
-Sir James Goldsmith

Doesn't Nancy Pelosi look like a deer in the headlights? I've never seen a more stupid looking politician - with the exception of George Bush. This is a perfect example of how the American voter is in between a rock and a hard place these days. We've got the Republicans driving us into a ditch of economic ruin with an open border policy that just won't die. A factory export program that is second to none and a illegal labor import program to bring in cheap workers for the few industries we have left. Under the banner of Free Trade the Republicans are digging an economic ditch for America. The Democrats only solution appears to be to dig the ditch deeper. Not much of a choice there. America is truly between a rock and a hard place - and I'm not talking about the rock of Christ.

We need some fresh blood in Washington. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, and please, no more nitwits like Reid and Pelosi. Duncan Hunter is the only candidate I really like - and Tancredo - and they have been marginalized by the media. They know how to build a fence. Electing more Democrats to solve this problem is like opting to drive America's economy into a brick wall at 50 mph instead of the current 40 mph. That is the choice. Tax and spend Democrats or Tax-less and Spend-more Republicans. That is what I call being stuck in between a rock and a hard place without a good choice. Bush or Clinton? When it comes to open borders there is no difference.

Deficit spending is ruining America. Deficit spending is bankrupting America. Deficit spending is turning us into a slave nation of indentured servants by having us serve the private banks that are run by the Federal Reserve. There is nothing Federal about the FED. Talk about putting the fox in charge of the hen house. They are living high on the hog from the accumulated interest earned from America's debt. The deficit for the Federal budget is alone over 9 trillion dollars. 400 billion dollars a year is what the American taxpayer has to pay - just for the interest to that debt. Our entire national debt is over 48 trillion dollars and soaring. No - that is not a typo. Think about it. But Pelosi and Bush don't want to build a fence to protect our economy. They want to give away our economic strength and advantages to the Mexicans. Why? Compassionate conservatism? Liberal white guilt? Socialist ideals of income redistribution is more like it. It is easy for the elite to come up with plans like this. It doesn't affect their incomes. It is not coming out of their pockets. They are the ones reaping the big profits from exploiting third world countries in the name of Free Trade - the new economic world order. So the filthy rich get filthier and the poor get poorer.

This is according to Kenneth F. Scheve a Professor of Political Science at Yale University and Matthew J. Slaughter a Professor of Economics at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth who also served on the White House Council of Economic Advisers from 2005 to 2007.
Globalization has brought huge overall benefits, but earnings for most U.S. workers -- even those with college degrees -- have been falling recently; inequality is greater now than at any other time in the last 70 years. Whatever the cause, the result has been a surge in protectionism. To save globalization, policymakers must spread its gains more widely. The best way to do that is by redistributing income.
Unfortunately they recognize the economic problems due to globalization but fail to realize it is caused by the very trade policies they promote. Instead of fixing the real problem they opt for the typical socialist band-aid solution of income redistribution through even more manipulation of the tax code. Please - enough already with the taxes!

Here former Mexican President Vicente the Fox, shares his vision of a North American Union with us.
"I'm talking about a community of North America, an integrated agreement of Canada, the United States, and Mexico in the long term, 20, 30, 40 years from now. And this means that some of the steps we can take is, for instance, to agree that in five years we will make this convergence on economic variables. That may mean 10 years we can open up that border when we have reduced the gap in salaries and income."
- Former Mexican President Vicente Fox (August, 2000)
I hear you Vicente, loud and clear. "Soon the whole world will hear you". Reduce the gap in salaries and income. Open up that border. The intentional strategy to transfer wealth from the haves in America to the have nots south of the border by free trade and immigration policy. Economic variables? Isn't that the same line that the three Amigos used after the last SPP meeting on jelly beans in Quebec last August? It just goes to show that even though Mexico and Canada have different leaders now, it is the same open border agenda. Liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, Bush or Clinton, Fox or Calderon. It is the same old song and dance of the NAU. The new theme song of the New World Order.
"...We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a New World Order -- can emerge"...
-GHW Bush (September 11, 1990)
European multi-millionaire Sir James Goldsmith testified before the Senate Commerce Committee in 1994 on G.A.T.T. (General Agreements on Tariffs & Trade), which codifies trade agreements between countries under the auspices of the WTO or the UN. He described in detail how free trade agreements and globalization policies are simply a means to transfer wealth from America and industrialized countries to under developed third world nations. A redistribution of wealth on a global scale. A serious mistake. It becomes clear why they are pushing so hard for immigration reform. It is part of the plan to transfer our wealth to Mexico and South America.
"With the GATT, America will go from a trot — under the NAFTA — to a headlong gallop into total economic and social destruction."
"It must surely be a mistake to adopt an economic policy which makes you rich if you eliminate your national workforce and transfer production abroad, and which bankrupts you if you continue to employ your own people."
"Think again… one thing I pray you do. This is the single most important economic act the Western world has ever taken… it will change the life of every American." -Sir James Goldsmith
Here a few of the Marxist ideas of this new economic world order proposed in the G.A.T.T. treaty. Suffice it to say it is unadulterated one world socialism.
"...(b) The broadest co-operation of all the States members of the international community, based on equity, whereby the prevailing disparities in the world may be banished and prosperity secured for all."
"All efforts should be made to reform the international monetary system with …the following objectives:
"(h) promote an increasing net transfer of real resources from [America] the developed to the developing countries;…
"IV (a) To formulate an international code of conduct for the transfer of technology [from America] corresponding to needs and conditions prevalent in developing countries…
"(e).... Preferential treatment should be given to imports and the exports of those [developing] countries;…
…all member States [including America] pledge to make full use of the UN system in the implementation of the present "Programme of Action", …in working for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and thereby strengthening the role of the UN in the field of world-wide cooperation for economic and social development.
One world economic domination by the elite through the UN is what this trade treaty portends - all in the name of Free Trade.
The Communist maxim is: "From those according to their ability, to those according to their need". This statement from the NAU article, Chertoff, Gutierrez, Rice: Plotting Bush's North American Union, shows just how communist the idea of free trade can be.
Communist Manifesto author Karl Marx must be smiling. Speaking in 1848 to the Democratic Association of Brussels, Marx said, "In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade."
In his Manifesto, Marx wrote, "The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationalities." Remember that this is the CFR’s goal, as noted in my first bullet. For decades, CFR members have dominated the administrations of our presidents, whether they call themselves Republicans or Democrats.
Notice Marx spoke to the Democratic Association of what is now the HQ of the all powerful European Union in Brussels. While the press writes of the EU in glowing terms those in Europe that are now subjected to the autocracy of Brussels are not so happy - realizing all to late they have lost their economic freedom and national independence. Not a good trade for the illusion of economic power. But that is exactly what the CFR proposal of an NAU is for America.
"For the first time, "North America" is more than just a geographical expression. NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America...
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian interparliamentary groups into a single "North American Parliamentary Group." This might encourage legislators to stop tossing invective across their borders and instead start bargaining to solve shared problems.
- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)

Bush laughs at NAU conspiracy theories

Recently, President Bush stated that he found these fears of an SPP/NAU conspiracy "amusing." Judicial Watch does not find it amusing and is calling for complete transparency and disclosure in the matter. Something the Bush Administration has so far failed to do. A new freedom of information lawsuit was filed on Aug 10 by Judicial Watch for the release of NACC influence on the Commerce Dept, which advises our government on the SPP process. Judicial Watch's complaint is that the "Agency’s Use of
NACC (North American Competitiveness Council) in Violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act".

Our Panderer in Chief also shares his views of our blooming relationship with Mexico:
"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the New America."
"Some still look at Latin America through old stereotypes."
"But I see a hemisphere of 500 million people, striving with the dream of a better life. A dream of free markets and free people, in a hemisphere free from war and tyranny. That dream has sometimes been frustrated -- but it must never be abandoned."
"Should I become president, I will look South, not as an afterthought, but as a fundamental commitment of my presidency. Just as we ended the great divide between East and West, so today we can overcome the North-South divide."
"But the ultimate goal will remain constant ... free trade from northernmost Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."
- U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush in a campaign speech on the Western Hemisphere and Latin America, Miami, Florida (August, 2000)
Free Trade and Globalization have become the Trojan horses of the New World Order. Under the guise of Free Trade they plan to spread democracy to a globalized economy. Or should I say impose? Now this all sounds well and good when you read about it in the news but what does it really mean for America?

This is Dr. William L. Pierce's explanation:
In brief, it is a utopian system in which the U.S. economy (along with the economy of every other nation) will be "globalized"; the wage levels of U.S. and European workers will be brought down to those of workers in the Third World; national boundaries will for all practical purposes cease to exist; an increased flow of Third World immigrants into the United States and Europe will have produced a non-White majority everywhere in the formerly White areas of the world; an elite consisting of international financiers, the masters of the mass media, and managers of multinational corporations will call the shots; and United Nations "peace keeping" forces will be used to keep anyone from opting out of the system.
This explanation from
Zbigniew Brzeninski is a little more ambiguous but just as scary!
"The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values."
– Zbigniew Brzeninski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter and President Bush as co-chairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force; executive director of the Trilateral Commission
A more controlled society unrestrained by traditional values? Is that anything like Fasicm Zbigniew? And of coarse we couldn't leave out the "money changers" from the FED:
"A global economy requires a global currency."
- Paul Volcker, Former Chairman, Federal Reserve, Single Global Currency
Here is Alan Greenspan sharing his version of the commie income re-distribution plan with us in his new book: The Age of Turbulence - Adventures in a New World (Order?)
"He maintains that immigration reform, "by opening up the United States to the world's very large and growing pool of skilled workers," will help reduce the inequality of incomes.
- Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve (September, 2007)
It becomes very clear that all these powerful men are in complete agreement about our future. In fact that is the very agenda behind our open border policy. The redistribution of our wealth to the poor countries of Central and South America. It is a diabolical plot that drives immigration reform. Why would we be worried about inequality of incomes except that they plan to create a community of North America or a North American Union. If Fox knew about it, who told him? Maybe Bush told him. Although Bush is not the one behind this plan. He is just working for them. Who is "them" - then? A very good question. They are a slippery bunch. But you can find them in CFR meetings. You can find CFR members in SPP meetings and think tanks on foreign policy. You can find CFR and Trilateral Commission members all through our government - especially the State and Defense and Commerce Dept.

Well looky here! It's CFR day in the Oval Office. Notice how they all get along so very well. Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives. A regular bipartisan love fest. I'll give you a hint. It's just a game they play called politics. These are the men and women holding the reigns of power in America. Coincidentally they never have to elected. They are always appointed by the politicians we elect. They are never scrutinized by the press. It is a very unique arrangement that the CFR has developed. They have found a way to have power and control and influence in all areas of the Executive branch without having to be themselves elected.
A very convenient arrangement indeed. It is very communist.

The Council on Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
- Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations, mentor to Bill Clinton
We can't finish this expose of the New World Order without mentioning the "mother" of all Internationalists, David Rockerfeller. Without a doubt he is a key player in the scheme to de-industrialize America and render her impotent and helpless. A plan that has been many decades in the works. The Rockerfeller family and money has intimately connected with both the CFR and Trilateral Commission. Organizations whose stated goals are to create a one world government. The Rockerfeller family traditionally call themselves Republicans. They are certainly not Reagan Republicans. They are an elite family who figured how to take advantage of America's freedom and make lots of money. Some people really admire that. I'm not a Rockerfeller Republican. The ability to make millions without any regard as to the moral consequences of that gain is not an admirable character trait in my opinion.

"No man can serve both God and mammon."

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years........It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

- David Rockefeller in Baden-Baden, Germany 1991, thanking major media for keeping secret for decades the movement of the prophetic one world government.
The NWO are attempting to create an economy to be served by all. Build a fence and it will stop the NAU plans. Defeat the NAU and we will stop the NWO. Stop exporting America's industrial strength to poor third world countries and it will stop the NWO plan to bankrupt America. Stop spending money we don't have on government programs we don't need and we will stop the plan of the world bankers to make slaves of us all.

We the American people have the power and can still stop this but we must wake up and JUST BUILD THE FENCE.

Rep. Pelosi criticizes border fence

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called a plan to build fencing along parts of the Mexico border a "terrible idea" that overlooks local communities.

Pelosi made the comments during her trip to the Rio Grande Valley for the annual Hispanic Engineering, Science & Technology Week conference at the University of Texas-Pan American.

"I have been against the fence, I thought it's a bad idea even when it was just a matter of discussion," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "These are communities where you have a border going through them, they are not communities where you have a fence splitting them."

And finally here is one last quote from David Rockerfeller, revealing who he really is and who he really is for. I can assure you - that is not America.

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- Quote from David Rockefeller's Memoirs (2002)
"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

-General Douglas MacArthur

Many of the quotes used here can be found at Americans for Sovereignty . It is an excellent site and source for info on the SPP/NAU, the Amero, and the NAFTA Superhighway.