Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Illegal drug smuggling ring busted in Atlanta

Georgia has been identified as the new drug smuggling center for illegal drugs coming from Mexico through Texas. Interestingly Bush has done nothing to stop this nor has Michael Chertoff. Putting the DEA under his control is like asking the Mafia to police the Longshoreman. The recent bust is massive with 67 suspects apprehended. And yes they are all illegal aliens with connection to both Drug Cartels and Mexican gangs. Just another price Americans have to pay so the elite can have an open border policy that makes them richer.

Feds bust drug ring that used Atlanta area as operations hub

By The Associated Press

ATLANTA - Federal agents this week charged 67 people, put a dent in two Mexican drug cartels that used the Atlanta area as a hub of operations and seized large quantities of cash, cocaine and assault rifles.

Details of the multistate investigation were announced Friday as criminal complaints and indictments against the suspects were unsealed.

Investigators said the arrests and seizures reinforce that the Atlanta area has become a hub for drug trafficking because of its transportation and telecommunications systems and its proximity to large U.S. population areas.

"We'll make them pay by taking away their money, and we'll try to make them pay by taking away their freedom," U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said at a news conference where millions of dollars in seized cash and drugs were displayed.

The charges were a product of investigations targeting two Mexican drug trafficking organizations that allegedly smuggled cocaine, methamphetamine and marijuana into the U.S. for distribution in Georgia, California, North Carolina, New York and elsewhere.

The drug cartels cooperated with each other, authorities said.

Authorities said the drugs would mostly be brought across the border into Texas and trucked to the Atlanta area for distribution to other parts of the country.

Criminal complaints and indictments against the suspects were issued over the course of several days starting Tuesday, and authorities have since arrested many of the defendants, though some remained at large Friday.

Charges against them include conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute a controlled substance. Nahmias said more charges were expected, and he added that the suspects would face significant prison time if convicted. Lawyers would be appointed to them if they didn't have their own, he said.

Nahmias said investigators had not yet determined how many, if any, of the suspects were illegal immigrants. While most of their full names were provided Friday, in many cases their hometowns and addresses were not.

A statement from prosecutors said 67 people were charged in federal court in Atlanta and that over the past several days 111 kilograms of cocaine, 17 pounds of crystal meth, roughly $8 million to $10 million in cash and at least 32 firearms were seized. Dozens of other people were arrested in California in an earlier but related investigation.

An agent suffered an injured ankle while chasing one of the suspects arrested in Georgia this week, and during another arrest shots were fired and a suspect was injured, Nahmias said, without elaborating. The injuries to the agent and the suspect were not life-threatening, he said.

Link to WSB video on this drug bust:

"Feds: Most Significant Drug Seizure Operation In Metro History Made - Video - WSB Atlanta"

Thanks to Todd Walker of the Georgia Chapter of the Minutemen for this link!

Jeanne Assam - The Lioness of Judah

In the aftermath of the two recent church shootings in Colorado, a real American hero has emerged. Anyone would be a hero in this situation but Jeanne Assam seems to be an unlikely heroine in the right place at the right time doing and saying all the right things. I couldn't help but be impressed by her poise, confidence and humility. We are grateful that she was able to end what surely what would have been a much more tragic situation. Though recent reports indicate the gunman took his own life, there is no doubt that she played the conclusive role in stopping his murderous rampage. She is my hero!

This is a remarkable story of individual heroism. Her actions saved the lives of perhaps hundreds of people that morning. It was by her own recommendation that they increase security that fateful morning. That is being both attentive and obedient to God's will.

Here is her testimony in her own words:

There was applause as Assam spoke to reporters and TV cameras saying, "God guided me and protected me."

When asked by a reporter if she felt like a hero, Assam said, "I wasn't just going to wait for him to do further damage."

"I give credit to God," she said.

Assam described how the gunman, Matthew Murray, entered the east entrance of the church firing his rifle.

"There was chaos," Assam said, as parishioners ran away, "I will never forget the gunshots. They were so loud."

"I saw him coming through the doors" and took cover, Assam said. "I came out of cover and identified myself and engaged him and took him down."

"God was with me," Assam said. "I didn't think for a minute to run away."

Assam said she believes God gave her the strength to confront Murray, keeping her calm and focused even though he appeared to be twice her size and was more heavily armed.

Murray was carrying two handguns, an assault rifle and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition, said Sgt. Jeff Johnson of the Colorado Springs Police Department.

"It seemed like it was me, the gunman and God," she said.

Assam worked as a police officer in downtown Minneapolis during the 1990s and is licensed to carry a weapon. She attends one of the morning services and then volunteers as a guard during another service.

Boyd said Assam was the one who suggested the church beef up its security Sunday following the Arvada shooting, which it did. The pastor credited the security plan and the extra security for preventing further bloodshed.

Assam said she was ending three days of fasting on Sunday when fate put her in the path of the gunman.

"I was praying to God that he direct me" in what to do in life, Assam said. "God made me strong."

Amid deafening cracks of gunfire, smoke-spewing canisters and the flight of thousands of New Life Church members, Jeanne Assam said she suddenly saw the hallways clear and a gunman come through the door.

"I took cover. I identified myself. I engaged him. I took him down," the 42-year-old former law officer and volunteer church security guard said Monday at a news conference in the Colorado Springs police station.

"I just said, 'Holy Spirit, be with me.' I wasn't even shaking," Assam said. "I give the credit to God. I say this very humbly. God was with me."
Assam, a member of New Life for only a few months, admitted she had been without sleep since Sunday's midday shootings at Colorado's largest church.

Assam said she had just ended a three-day fast Sunday. During the fasting she prayed and asked God to help her decide what to do with her future and whether she should work again in law enforcement.

"I was weak," she said. "God made me strong. What was going through my mind is how awesome God is."


Quotes are taken from the following two articles:

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_7684728
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/14817480/detail.html

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Clinton damage control imposes its will on Gov. Spitzer

I read the following article with a certain amount of amusement. These politicians are such slow learners. Apparently the Clinton people realized this issue was spiraling out of control. That we could only be so fortunate. Damage control Clinton style. Having waffled on the issue at the debate, she then committed herself to supporting Sptizer's plan to give illegal aliens drivers licences in New York so they could register to vote for her in 2008. Now that has proven to be a disaster for her poll numbers in Iowa. So the only solution was to get Spitzer to back off his plan and eat some humble pie. They hope it will all blow over and the issue will fade. Wrong again Hillary! This is not the Iraq where you can vote against it after you voted for it. This is the critical issue for America. Are we going to be a sovereign nation of many sovereign states or are we going to import millions of slave laborers from Mexico to mow our lawns and pick our lettuce?

She has shown clearly that she is for immigration reform. That means she is for importing slave laborers and giving them voting rights. The high reproduction rate of illegals insures the Democrats a majority at the voting booths across America. This is an inherent liability the gay lobby has not been able to overcome. Those gay couples don't reproduce very fast - go figure. And the no children urban yuppies don't help either. So it is obvious why panders like Hillary are falling over themselves trying to get illegal immigrant voting rights. I can only hope Wolf Blizter has enough courage not to be intimidated by the Clinton people. Hillary has existed in a bubble since she first entered the national political scene in 1992. The press essentially acts as her personal staff doing their best to make her look professional. She is know by those who have worked for her as a tyrant. The recent revelations of her planting questions in Townhall meetings and the mysterious generosity of poor Chinese immigrants have added to the recent bad smell of her campaign. It takes a village of idiots to still believe that Hillary is an honest straight forward person that represents some real hope for change in America. Apparently they have quite a few of those villages in Iowa and Hew Hampshire.

I can't help but wonder what was said to Spitzer to get him to back off this plan. Perhaps she sent him a picture of Vince Foster with a note that said, "think about it". Alas, we will probably never know the truth. Obviously he is their own personal political lapdog. In fact it was probably her people that got Spitzer to initiate the plan to get illegals registered to vote in New York for her in 2008. Bill has been very little political help for her. It seems the late nights of coke and women are finally taking their toll on Bill's wits and nose! I look forward to the debate in Vegas, only to see if she has manages to intimidate all those "boys" in the press and media. We can only hope that what happens in Vegas doesn't stay in Vegas. I'm hoping for another performance like she had in Philly. She is starting to show some real weaknesses in her ability to handle some real political pressure. If the rest of the Democratic contenders are smart they will continue to gang up on her. Not that Barack O'bomber and pretty boy Edwards represent any kind of real alternative for America either. But if Russert or Blizter don't show up for work next week she will the number one suspect on my list!

OUT-OF-GAS ELIOT PUTS THE BRAKES ON LICENSE PLAN

And poor Hillary Clinton still can't make up her mind. This latest statement completely contradicts what she told Candy Crowley of CNN just one week ago! The US Senate just took the biggest drubbing ever by the American people on this issue and she still doesn't get it? If she hadn't been so busy running fior president she might have learned something by the defeat of Shamnesty.
Clinton Says No to Licenses for Illegals
Nov 14, 5:26 PM (ET)

By DEVLIN BARRETT

WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday came out against granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, after weeks of pressure in the presidential race to take a position on a now-failed ID plan from her home state governor.
Clinton has faced criticism from candidates in both parties for her noncommittal answers on New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's attempt to allow illegal immigrants in his state to receive driver's licenses. Spitzer abandoned the effort Wednesday.
"I support Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal," Clinton said in a statement. "As president, I will not support driver's licenses for undocumented people and will press for comprehensive immigration reform that deals with all of the issues around illegal immigration including border security and fixing our broken system."
Clinton stumbled when asked about the issue during a Democratic debate two weeks ago, and her new position comes the day before another debate where opponents are expected to raise the issue again.
Rival campaigns made clear they were not letting go of the issue.



What a joke she is!!!

Monday, November 12, 2007

Local 287g enforcement works in Georgia

The following video shows that the Sheriff Dept in Cobb County, GA is having some success doing the job that Chertoff and the Dept of Homeland insecurity won't do. While the illegal alien lobbies cry wolf, the fact is that enforcement of the law is effective. If the Law was enforced uniformly throughout the country, illegal aliens would soon find that the big candy store north of the border called the U.S.A., is not such a hospitable place to "migrate too". Mexico will have to learn to fix their own problems instead of exporting them to America.

287 g - Georgia Sheriff acts on illegal immigration


Monday, November 5, 2007

Hillary Clinton - Smartest woman in the world?

In 1992 when confronted by the Flower's accusation of Bill's adulterous ways, Hillary said she wasn't a "stand by your man" kind of gal - but in 1998 there she was standing by her man who finally got caught red handed with Monica. Now she tells her Democratic rivals, "if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen." I find that very interesting because I never saw Hillary as a Betty Crocker type of gal either? I guess presidential ambitions trump the feminist liberation ideals of her formative liberal years at Wellesley. Long gone are the carefree braless summer days reading Lenin, Mao, and Friedan with Bill at Yale. Her political ambitions would also explain why she not only tolerated Bill's adultery but zealously defended him. He was after all her meal ticket to the Whitehouse. Now is that a marriage made in heaven, or hell?

Here is my simple question for Hillary. If you are so smart why are you taking a position on Spitzer's plan for legal drivers licences for illegals that according to a recent poll 77% of Americans are against? Well, she now admits, "I wasn't at my best the other night". So even the smartest woman in the world can have a bad night. But what was a bad night has now been extended into a bad week. According to Lou Dobbs recent polls have her plummeting 7% since the fateful debate when she was outed by the now reviled Tim Russert. Funny, I always thought of Russert was one of the good 'ol liberal boys in the media. He ought to be careful or he could end up swimming with the fishes like Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and James Macdougal, but I digress into the as yet unproven allegations that she had something to do with their convenient and untimely demise. Some say that Bill is the one that had them killed but I'll confess I've always seen the killer potential in Hillary. Cold hearted, cruel, calculating, corrupt, and cool headed are some of the more dominant characteristics I've seen in her over the years. And we have seen her lose her cool now haven't we!

Pandering to illegals and "immigration reform" is political suicide for any politician of either party in America today - Massachusetts Kennedy fans(morons) excepted. In her recent interview with Candy Crowley of CNN, she stubbornly defended her support of the issue. She ought to consult with immigration flip-flopper John (I never met an illegal I didn't like) McCain on just how unpopular an issue this is with the American people. It just killed his presidential bid. It will end hers too and rightfully so as it was during the Clinton years when illegal immigration went from a trickle to a flood. NAFTA, free trade and open borders were all Clinton policies. Free trade in humans too apparently "doing the work that Americans won't do." It is a losing issue of the ruling oligarchy of international bankers and business and the one world global elitists.

So you can't say she was just having a bad night. She is finally revealing her true chameleon nature. The veneer of her "noblesse oblige" has worn off. A chicken in every pot and $5000 for every baby. Flip flopping along like John Kerry and pandering to illegals like Bush. We already have a 'Panderer in Chief' in the Whitehouse. We don't need another. Within two minutes she was both for and against the Spitzer plan. Well, apparently now after consulting with her staff she has decided to come out for "immigration reform." Now there is a platform with real populist support! All I can say is, "you go girl." I'd also have to say she looked terrible tonight on CNN. With those baggy eyes, tight bitchy lips and strident tone she looked like she hadn't slept in a week. Apparently she has now forsaken the cleavage strategy that never could keep Bill's interest for a real winning issue like "immigration reform." She really hasn't got all that much going for her, with the exception of the MSM constantly lauding her and all that dirty campaign money being laundered through Chinatown. Who would have guessed that she was such a draw with Chinese immigrants that can't speak a lick of English. And just how does somebody making $10 dollars an hour come up with a $1000 political gift for Hillary anyway? That some sacrifice! A real widow's mite.

And to add more fuel to the fire Kathleen Willey, former Bill Clinton fan, wants to pile on to poor Hillary too with her new book accusing the Clintons of killing her husband? Wow, just how far will Bill go to get laid? Do I see a pattern here? Can anybody connect the dots? Oh, the injustice of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy! Just how gullible are the Democrats? Just how desperate are they to return to power? Who could be dense enough to be fooled by this pair of Arkansas "white trash" love birds. But, there they go again and Bill's recent feeble attempt to defend his "wife" from being swiftboated seems to have backfired already. Oh - for the good old days when the Clintons could say anything and get away with it.

O.K., I admit it. I don't feel sorry for them at all! Does that now make me a part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? Oh, I do hope so!

All I can say for Hillary is "You Go Girl"!





Lou Dobbs rags on both Hillary and the Democrats

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Peter Schiff says 3.9% economic growth baloney

While I am usually reticent to write about economic matters in detail. Lacking a degree in economics and having only a elementary understanding of investment strategies I am hesitant to wade into this morass. In reality however only a little common sense is required to see the dire state of our economy and country. Those with the degrees are themselves the ones that have created this mess over the last 40 years. The masters of economics theories that are tethered only to an unprincipled lust for profit.

The recent announcement of a 3.9% economic growth in the third quarter by our government seemed more than a little suspect to me. I have mentioned my concerns to many about our economic problems for months. In faithful conservative Republican circles I am often greeted with derision and hubris for even daring to mention that we are headed for some economic rough going in the not so distant future. As if the economy were itself some animated god impervious to the obvious laws of nature. Immune to the of cause and effect of mankind. Epithets like commie and socialist are often directed at me by the standard knee jerk Republican reaction to any type of real thought about our disastrous free trade and economic strategies. Some educated and some uninformed, all displaying a naive faith in an economic dogma that itself is flawed. Meanwhile, America's middle class bears the burden on their way to foreclosure. The American dream is being bankrupted by destructive and foolish deficit economic strategies that only benefit the fat cats on Wall street. And soon they too will have to pay the piper.

Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Capitol recently wrote an article detailing just how ludicrous the government claim of recent economic growth is. By fudging the inflation index they are able to claim growth in our economy that in reality is in recession. By any objective indicator our economy is shrinking not growing. So if the government thinks they can prop up this deficit economy with false numbers they are only fooling themselves and those still believe in our own government. Who on earth would still be that gullible and naive?

I will post his entire article since he explains our economic situation much better than I can.

The US Commerce Department’s latest numbers are meaningless
By:Peter Schiff

Yesterday, as the US dollar fell to new record lows and oil and gold prices surged to new highs, the US Commerce Department delivered meaningless government data that managed to report the lowest US inflation in the last half century. Wall Street was hardly fooled.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by 390 points, or 2.6 percent, to be followed down by Asian markets today. According to Bloomberg, the Morgan Stanley Capital International Asia-Pacific Index lost 1.3 percent to 170.10 as of 9:30 a.m. in Tokyo, falling from a record. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average declined 1.9 percent to 16,554.02. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 Index dropped from a high. All markets open for trading retreated

These bizarre numbers were integral in allowing the Commerce Department to report 3.9 percent annualized GDP growth in the third quarter, which was heralded by the bulls as evidence that a resilient U.S. economy had shrugged off the problems in the housing and mortgage markets. However, the government’s ability to make “economic growth” magically appear is based purely on statistical finesse.

To arrive at this rate, the government had to assume that inflation during the quarter ran at an annualized rate of .8 percent (that’s less than 1 percent). That is the lowest rate of inflation used to calculate U.S. GDP since the Eisenhower administration. With oil priced at almost $100 per barrel, gold futures trading over $800 per ounce, the dollar hitting record lows, and the Fed printing money like it is going out of style, the government has the nerve to claim that current inflation is the lowest it has been in half a century. Unbelievable!

Just in case there is some confusion, the government adjusts nominal GDP gains using the GDP deflator, which represents the inflation rate during the time period being measured. This is done to strip inflation out of the GDP calculation so that only real growth gets counted: not nominal gains that result purely from inflation.

The consensus estimate for 3rd quarter GDP growth was 3.4 percent. The reason we beat that number was that the government adjusted the nominal 4.7 percent gain by a mere .8 percent. Had the government assumed a higher rate of inflation, say 2.6 percent (identical to the rate used to deflate second quarter GDP,) the 3rd quarter gain would have been only 2.1 percent, well shy of the consensus forecast. My guess is that inflation is actually running at an annualized rate closer to 10 percent. Therefore using a more honest deflator, the U.S. economy is actually contracting, which would explain the recent anecdotal evidence provided by various economic polls, voter dissatisfaction and consumer sentiment numbers. In fact, if one simply measures U.S. GDP using gold or any other currency, it is clear that we are already in a recession.

Similar illusions are created in other numbers, such as retail sales, corporate earnings, and stock prices, which are all rising merely as a result of actual inflation being higher than the official reports. For example, higher retail sales reflect consumers paying higher prices for the products that they buy. They may in fact be buying less stuff, but are paying more for it. Further, part of the gains result from tourists using their appreciated foreign currencies to buy products cheaper here than they can in the own countries. I have heard about Canadians checking into U.S. hotels with empty suitcases, crossing the border to indulge in weekend shopping sprees.

Corporate earnings, particularly those of multi-nationals, are padded as their foreign currency denominated earnings translate into more dollars when those earnings are repatriated. However, such gains are illusions, as companies merely earn more dollars of diminished value for the goods they sell. The actual volume of exports does not necessarily improve much, as evidenced by weak industrial production and manufacturing employment. When those additional debased dollars are paid out as dividends, they confer no real increase in global purchasing power to shareholders.

Similarly, just as inflation causes prices to rise for goods and services it causes stock prices to rise as well. Though such gains may be less than the actual increase in the cost of living, as long as the government gets away with using bogus CPI numbers which fail to fully reflect inflation, Wall Street takes credit for nominal gains as if they were real.

However, as ridiculous as the phony GDP number was, yesterday’s biggest joke was a report on global competitiveness put out by the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, which ranked the U.S. economy as the world’s most competitive. To arrive at this conclusion, the forum has obliterated the obvious under a mountain of theory. In determining country rankings, the WEF weighed strengths in their "12 Pillars of Competitiveness", including: institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic stability, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labor market efficiency, financial market sophistication, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication and innovation. Completely ignored however are the measurable results of competitiveness, notably a trade surplus and a strong currency.

It is as if the WEF decided to judge a weight loss contest without using a scale, by instead focusing only on mental attitude, dedication, perseverance, and nutritional education! As a result the prize is awarded to the fattest contestant. Based on the empirical evidence of a gargantuan trade deficit, staggering global indebtedness, and a declining currency, the United States is clearly not the most competitive economy in the world.


I saw Peter Schiff on Glenn Beck last week. Here is the recording.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

The Late Great USA by Jerome Corsi - Book Review

"The development of a North American consciousness will likely come from increased trade and investment among the three NAFTA partners."
-Toward a North American Community Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

I just finished reading my copy of The Late Great USA, by Jerome Corsi. It is a good read and a fascinating look into the belly of the beast, so to speak, of the North American Union. I will admit that at first I was a little hesitant to read this book. Though I found the subject compelling I had an aversion to reading about it in depth. Perhaps I thought it would be boring - it was not. Perhaps I was afraid of what I would find out - I was not. I could not actually put my finger on what was causing me to procrastinate. Perhaps it was just that - procrastination.

If you are concerned about the future of our great country then this book is a must read. Why? Because if you don't read it you will not fully understand what is going on in America today. I thought I did - but I found out many things I was not aware of. For instance I had no idea how the European Union came to be. I had read about it in the news at some point a few years back and thought to myself, "Well, that sounds like a great idea." Little did I know what it might portend for America. There are some very valid reasons to form the EU. The history of Europe's wars are a good one. There are none to form a North American Union, with the exception of greed and the insatiable lust for more power by the elite.

Corsi begins by showing the motive and method for forming the EU. A fifty year plan that was fully realized some 22 years after Jean Monnet, the French architect and "father" of the EU had died in 1979. Through a well laid plan of stealth and slow incremental economic and trade agreements, the foundation was laid for the eventual EU and the Euro. It was discussed as part of an ongoing public policy debate in Europe over the years. So far there has been virtually no public debate on the NAU. In fact if anyone tries to bring it up they are immediately tarred and feathered as a conspiratorial nut and ridiculed and derided as delusional and paranoid. That type of response in and of itself ought to arouse suspicions as to the true motive and intent of the NAFTA/SPP/NAU agenda, which originated in the exclusive 'think tanks' of the CFR elite.

There numerous parallels between the formation of the EU and what is happening now with the so called Free Trade Agreement of NAFTA and the more secretive SPP agenda. The EU began with an innocent Coal and Steel Trade Agreement between France and Germany in 1950. Fifty years later it had developed into a full blown autocratic bureaucracy centered in Brussels with a common currency. Nameless "working groups" of faceless bureaucrats now decide the fate of Europe. Though the crumbling edifice of an elected representative government still exists - in reality Brussels determines the fate of Europe. The Central Bank of the EU controls Europe now. Is this our fate as well? To be controlled by Banks of Wall Street?

The method of the Bush Administration in pursuing this SPP agenda would have left Bill Clinton in awe. Word games, semantics and ambiguous definitions of what the meaning of is - is, characterize this less than forth coming administration. No wonder Bush gave Clinton a virtual blanket pardon when elected in 2000. Through carefully crafted "dialogs" that avoid the lawful process of Congressional oversight of treaties and legislation, they have forged ahead purposely avoiding any real public debate on this issue. Dishonesty, deceitfulness, stealth and denial are the methods of hundreds of "working groups". A shadow government that exists within the framework of our current Federal government. Appointed by Bush they utilize public time and taxpayer money to work on deceptively worded terms such as "harmonizing economic variables." FOIA requests are the only way Judicial Watch has been able to pry the jealously guarded scraps of information from the mouth of this stealthy but ravenous beast. Nothing is revealed openly and like a great battle every hill seems to be contested by those dedicated to the elusive non-existent cause of the NAU. "Methinks the lady doth protest too much."

The so called "urban legend" but often discussed NAFTA Super Highway is a good case in point. This highway was mandated by the NAFTA agreement but now it mysteriously doesn't exist anymore? Now the Bush administration plays word games and semantics around the idea. I guess they think we are stupid. Meanwhile the TxDOT moves forward with plans and land seizures and artist renderings like the Trans-Texas Corridor pictured here. They are subcontracting the project out to a Spanish firm (No not Mexican!), for an estimated cost of @$190 billion dollars. To add insult to injury Americans will have to pay tolls to the Spanish firm Cintra in order to use it! If it doesn't exist then just where is it coming from and where does it go then? What is it's non-existant purpose? They state very clearly that it is for bringing goods from China and Asia through Mexico and transporting them to the US and Canada. But we are suppose to believe it is not a critical part of a NAFTA Super Highway? Why through Mexico? No Teamsters Unions or Longshoreman Unions to deal with. No independent American Truckers. Less shipping costs and more profits for the multinational Corporations that are intentionally destroying America's economic and industrial strength for filthy lucre. The God of Free Trade is profit but "what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul in hell?"

The Bush administration is starting to take so much flak that they've put up an official government disinformation site. The following was posted about the non-existent NAFTA Super Highway:
Myth: The U.S. Government, working though the SPP, has a secret plan to build a "NAFTA Super Highway."

Fact: The U.S. government is not planning a NAFTA Super Highway. The U.S. government does not have the authority to designate any highway as a NAFTA Super Highway, nor has it sought such authority, nor is it planning to seek such authority. There are private and state level interests planning highway projects which they themselves describe as "NAFTA Corridors," but these are not Federally-driven initiatives, and they are not a part of the SPP.
-http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp
Yea, sure it isn't and "these are not the droids your looking for" either! An interesting and very careful choice of words. So they admit it exists but they have nothing to do with it. Nothing could be further from the truth. NAFTA is a Federal initiative and so is the SPP. SPP is an extension or continuation of NAFTA, although they are trying to do an end run around the US Constitution by calling it just an "ongoing dialog," or "a process." If it were so good for America you would think that they would be very proud of it and want to take credit for it as politicians are often want to do? Interestingly they claim that these are just "private and state interests". So are we to believe that states decided to do this on their own with no input or oversight from the Feds?

Even more troubling is the claim that this is a private interest. Who's private interest would that be? So big business is running the US Government? Is that what they are admitting? The NACC is advising the SPP which is controlling our government? Private business interests take precedent over the national security in an elected representative government now? This is a morally corrupt group of people and they are not just Republicans. Don't think for a minute if Al Gore or John Kerry were President it would be any better. This process was started under Bill Clinton and it will probably be worse if Hitlary gets elected.

O.K., so maybe it's not a NAFTA Super Highway, maybe it's really called a NASCO Super Corridor? What difference does it make what it is called? That is not the point. It still has the same purpose. Just because it's a state or private interest doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Is the Bush Administration trying to claim that they have no interest in a project of this size? That they have no responsibility for it? That they have no Federal authority over it? What the hell are they doing running the US government then? They ought to fired for being incompetent and inept or better yet impeached. Interestingly this particular picture was removed from the NASCO site after they started receiving a lot of attention over it - but we still have a copy! The very idea of building a project of this size and magnitude without any Federal oversight is patently ridiculous and a flagrant lie.

At a NASCO forum
held on April 30, 2004 in Fort Worth, Texas Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta told the NASCO meeting:

"The people in this room have vision. Thinking ahead, thinking long-term, you began to make aggressive plans to develop the NASCO trade corridor – this vital artery in our national transportation through which so much of our NAFTA traffic flows.

"It flows across our nation's busiest southern border crossing in Laredo; over North America's busiest commercial crossing, the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit; and through Duluth, and Peombina, North Dakota, and all the places in between."

"And to our friends from Mexico who are here today, I say, 'Welcome, and get ready.' Opening the border is of mutual benefit."


Just how is opening the border of mutual benefit to us? Oh excuse me, you meant mutually for the Chinese and your buddies getting rich off all that free trade? So if Mineta was not representing the Federal interests in this project - just who's interest is he representing? His big business buddies in NASCO?
His big business buddies in the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC)?
Is that what Bush means by private interests? I have to wonder how the Bush Administration's denial fits into this very revealing statement. Even on Mineta's website his speech is titled:


"NORTH AMERICA’S SUPERHIGHWAY COALITION TRANSPORTATION FORUM"


But somehow Bush can send his SPP lackey Jeffrey N. Shane to Congress and tell us with a straight face there is no plan for a superhighway and it is an "urban legend." Mineta called the NASCO Trade Corridor "a vital artery of our national transportation." Is he refering to the non-existant NAFTA super highway or the "urban legend"? It sounds pretty Federal to me. After all he is part of the Federal government? More Bush word games. Mineta is out there lauding the project and his undersecretary Shane is in front of Congress lying about it - saying it doesn't exist and calling it an "urban legend". Where is the MSM on this one? Silent as Rockerfeller promised. When Clinton was President, Republicans chaffed at his blatant lying. Have they now had a change of heart? A taste of power? Notice how Mineta calls it North America's Superhighway? Not America's anymore. North America - get used to it. More not so subtle SPP/NAU jargon of Robert Pastor. Corsi correctly identifies CFR member Pastor as the "father' of the idea of North American Union.

Jerome Corsi has an interesting literary background. Liberal Democrats still froth at the mouth for his part in "outing" John Kerry in the 2004 election with Unfit for Command. So Kerry was a pompous fraud that kept wounding himself because he was to stupid to learn the safe range of the M79 Grenade Launcher. Get over it! He lied so he could get purple hearts awarded when he should have received a band-aid. Get over it! He lied to Congress and the American people about the war just to get into politics and make a name for himself. Get over it! He stabbed his own soldiers in the back by lying about them and comparing them to Genghis Khan. Get over it! We have bigger fish to fry here.

It actually gives Corsi a lot of credibility in my estimation because like myself, here is a guy that supported Bush in both elections. Once he learned the truth about the CFR intention to create a North American Union and what was really behind our open borders and unofficial illegal immigration policy he did not hesitate to "out" Bush. So I consider him to be a true America hero for writing this book. Heck maybe GW should award him the Medal of Freedom. That is something Bush will surely never receive. Corsi pursues this touchy subject with an admirable measure of judicious restraint and objective analysis. All information is clearly documented and can be verified quite easily as I did myself on the important issues that I wanted to check.

Is the plan to create a North American Union a product of paranoid conspiratorial delusion or a reality being put into action as we speak by OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS? Corsi provides the clear documentation needed to show that it is indeed a real plan. It seems the only real conspiracy is the one by those involved including the media to deny it. Those easily led and fooled will of coarse repeat the denials with little if no real thought or investigation. Blind partisan political loyalties take priority over the truth these days. Bushbots or Clinton clones, it matters not. Such is the sorry state of political discourse for many in America today. Future generations depend on us to be alert and vigilant. They depend on us to take decisive action to preserve America's sovereignty and destiny to be a beacon of freedom to the world. The elite would twist that into a beacon free trade under a One World Government that they control. That was not the intent of our founding fathers. Greed and the lust for money has twisted their loyalty and honor. Though they were born American they have no allegiance to America, our country, the home of the free and the brave.

There is much more covered in the book and I highly recommend that you get a copy and read it.
  • Details of the NAFTA Free Trade fraud and ongoing SPP deception.
  • Funny money accounting practices that hide the magnitude of the real Federal budget deficits.
  • A Customs port in Kansas City built and paid for by American taxpayers and refered to as "Mexican sovereign territory.
  • Self destructive Free trade policies that hide the VAT (value added Tax) of other countries and are unfair to American workers and companies.
  • Massive trade deficits that are bankrupting America.
These are just some of the critical issues covered in detail by Corsi. "The very future of our great country and destiny depends upon it. You can even read it on Amazon as it is not out in paperback yet. I bought my copy at World Net Daily.

"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the New America."
- George W. Bush, candidate for president of the United States (August, 2000)


God Bless America!!!

Words and music by Irving Berlin
© Copyright 1938, 1939 by Irving Berlin

"While the storm clouds gather far across the sea,
Let us swear allegiance to a land that's free,
Let us all be grateful for a land so fair,
As we raise our voices in a solemn prayer. "

God Bless America,
Land that I love.
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam
God bless America, My home sweet home.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Chertoff - the open border jerk-off

Micheal Chertoff has been working overtime recently - running his mouth again. An appropriate endeavor for a Harvard trained lawyer. He is quite good at it though - running his mouth I mean. It is that which comes out of it that I find so disturbing. O.K., I admit it - I find his picture quite disturbing as well. Some have even compared him to Skelator. Just how did a Harvard trained lawyer that was appointed as a Federal Judge ever end up in charge of America's security in the first place? What were his qualifications for this important position? How did this clown ever get put into a position of being one of the most powerful men in America - in charge of our "Homeland Security"? Which begs the question - why is it called the Department of Homeland Security anyway? I find the term rather un-American, like intelligence or terror Czar. What are we like Europeans now? Homeland? Czars? These are not terms we commonly use in America or American politics - but they do use them in Europe. In the European Union for instance. Anyway, I'll get into that critical issue later in this post.

Michael Chertoff is an open border, pro-illegal immigration promoting yappy dog for his handler El Presidente Bush. It is understandable why he has never had any experience in getting elected in politics. The mere sound of his snotty condescending voice incites reactions in me, which if acted on, would have me confined behind bars for the rest of my earthly life. So why do I find this pretentious jerk-off so detestable? Some claim that he is a perfect example of governmental incompetence and should be summarily fired (I would like to suggest perhaps he should be frog marched around Washington by Joe Wilson). Unable and also apparently unwilling to secure our borders and therefore America that would seem the prudent solution. But perhaps there is more to this "jerk-off" than first appears. Obviously our own open border panderer in chief has no intention of firing him. He is probably simply elated with him.

Chertoff inherited perhaps the most thankless job in America today. He certainly is not responsible for our broken borders. That mess goes back decades. Reagan tried to fix it with an amnesty bill in 1986 and failed. The enforcement measures were never implemented. Not only were the laws never enforced but they were watered down incrementally by liberal legislation under Bush, Clinton and Bush again. So we can't blame him for the problem - but we can blame him for not fixing it. Chertoff 's job description should be updated to read something like this. "Spend a lot of time and money convincing the American people that your really trying to fix our broken borders but don't do anything to actually close our borders and protect America and at all costs find anyway to obstruct the lawful implementation of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 and above all else do not build a fence."

So now you see why Chertoff is perhaps one of the most qualified people in America for this job. He has no intention of securing our borders or stopping illegal immigration. He has no intention of deporting illegals back to the country of origin. It is not that he is corrupt and incompetent. He is doing exactly what he is suppose to do - pretend that he is trying to stop illegal immigration while using every little Harvard lawyer trick in the book he can think of to actually increase it. Remember this, "jerk-off" works for a guy who has openly stated that he is against a fence and therefore against securing our borders. His recent appearance on the Glenn Beck show proves my point. He spent the entire time trying to convince us that he really is trying to enforce the law and build a fence but he is being obstructed by a "Federal Judge". Wow, I really feel your pain Michael. We, the American people, are the ones being obstructed by a former Federal Judge. This is a guy that finds more whiny excuses for why he can't do his job than a professional politician.

Here are just a few of the jerk-off's recent illegal immigration statements that reveal his lack of real interest in enforcing our current immigration laws.

"Every time a Border Patrol officer is transporting a load of future housekeepers and landscapers to someplace to be returned, he's not looking for drug dealers or drug loads," Chertoff said.
Commenting to Wolf Blizter on the growing opposition to his Shamnesty Bill.
"Yea, well first I understand there's some people who expect ah anything other than capitol punishment is an amnesty."
And again commenting on the recent defeat of Shamnesty
"I'm disappointed about the fact that there were some necessary tools which we needed to be able to do more than we can currently do in enforcing the law that were left on the floor of the Senate today," Chertoff said.
Here he is running his little open border yapper down in Texas.
Chertoff told a border-security conference in El Paso, Texas, that his department was now faced with having to enforce immigration laws that not only pull resources away from dealing with security threats but also have a negative impact on agriculture and other economic sectors that have become dependent on illegal migrant labor.

Homeland Security found itself facing “a need to pursue people coming here (illegally) to work, taking time away from (pursuing people) who are coming here to do us harm” like drug smugglers and terrorists.

Chertoff said he does not necessarily expect another vast comprehensive immigration package like the stalled reform bill. “It may take a couple of bites to digest,” he said.

But in the meantime his department and other federal agencies “had no choice” but to enforce existing laws, with consequences that will be “quite serious for some sectors” of the U.S. economy, like farming.

"In the end, it's very hard to secure the border with only brute force," he said. "It can be done, but it's going to be a labor-intensive and time-consuming way to do it."
What a joke! He's like a Sheriff claiming he doesn't have enough deputies to arrest a vandal because there might be some bank robbers out there somewhere getting away. If he doesn't have enough resources to do his job why doesn't he just go to congress and ask for what he needs? He is the very definition of non-enforcement. This is coming from our top Border Enforcement Officer mind you. Leadership works from the top down. How do you think the people that are working for him feel that are out there putting their lives on the life to secure our borders and keep America safe. Border Patrol Agents like Ramos and Compean. He actually states that he is for illegals coming here to work and to have to do something about it interferes with his real job of defending our borders from terrorists and drug dealers and gangs. And incidentally he also claims it will hurt our economy and cause us to send even more jobs offshore. So he even admits that exporting American jobs really is bad for us AND THEY KNOW IT! What a bunch of lying hypocrites. This is just another pathetic excuse by him to avoid doing his job. If the border were protected we could stop them all couldn't we Michael? And explain just how our border agents are going to be able to tell a serial rapist or murderer from a lettuce picker or landscaper? And please Michael, don't tell me you going to do it with your "gut feeling."

Is Chertoff a Harvard trained psychic too? Here the jerk-off freelances in seasonal terror attack predictions. Chertoff: Hunch Terror Attack Coming
U.S. counter-terror officials are warning of an increased risk of an attack this summer, given al-Qaida's apparent interest in summertime strikes and increased al-Qaida training in the Afghan-Pakistani border region.

On Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune that he had a "gut feeling" about a new period of increased risk.He based his assessment on earlier patterns of terrorists in Europe and intelligence he would not disclose.

"Summertime seems to be appealing to them," Chertoff said in his discussion with the newspaper about terrorists. "We worry that they are rebuilding their activities."
So if anyone thinks Chertoff is serious about stopping illegal immigration at our border I've got some swamp land to sell you down in Florida as well. He is serious about something though and that is the SPP/NAU agenda of the CFR. He has been one of the prime movers in the SPP talks. He is thoroughly briefed in the plan to establish an NAU and open borders and free migration are a key part of this plan. So where does the creation of the Dept of Homeland Defense fit into all this? Well that is precisely why it is called "Homeland Defense". It is not called American Defense or U.S. Defense or anything that relates to the concept of American national sovereignty. The reason is that the plan for the Defense is a continental defense. That includes relying on the corrupt and incompetent Mexican Army for our national security. In other words they are trying to create a defensive perimeter around the entire North American Continent. So the use of the phrase and ambiguity about "Homeland Defense" is intentional. It could mean America as we thought or it could mean a North American Union in the future. It could include Mexico and Canada and they wouldn't have to paint new logos on all those cars again. Saving the U.S. Taxpayers money!

Here are some statements by Robert Pastor a radical left-wing communist supporting university professor (imagine that), who is a passionate advocate of the NAU. According to Jerome Corsi, author of the NYT bestselling book, The Late Great U.S.A., Robert Pastor should be considered the father or main architect of the idea of North American Union.
"What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which will mean that goods can move easily across the border. We want a common security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of people within North America."
-Robert Pastor, Independent task force member, Council of Foreign Relations Independent Task Force on North America

Overcoming the tension between security and trade requires a bolder approach to continental integration: a North American customs union with a common external tariff (CET), which would significantly reduce border inspections and eliminate cumbersome rules-of-origin provisions designed to deny non-NAFTA products the same easy access. All three governments must also rethink the continental perimeter. Along with the CET, they should establish a "North American Customs and Immigration Force," composed of officials trained together in a single professional school, and they should fashion procedures to streamline border-crossing documentation.
Most important, the Department of Homeland Security should expand its mission to include continental security -- a shift best achieved by incorporating Mexican and Canadian perspectives and personnel into its design and operation."
- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)

North American Union Traitors Include Chertoff, Rice, Bush


So just what does Chertoff know about the NAU and when did he know it? I would expect that he knows a lot more than I do. It would certainly explain his pompous condescending know it all attitude towards America's rejection of his fraudulent immigration reform bill. He sees himself I'm sure, as the new Security Czar for a future North American Union. I understand now why they call it a Czar! It does not even bear a faint resemblance to our constitutional form of representative government. Congress has not been consulted nor have any treaties been ratified - yet the "amusing jelly bean dialogue" continues. The term dictatorial comes to mind. Chertoff has been present at all the important meetings and has played a pivotal role in advancing the SPP agenda. Immigration reform was the keystone of the plan to begin removing all restrictions for workers migrating to America. According to Corsi this was their first attempt to go public with the SPP agenda and it failed. Chertoff was one of the architects of Shamnesty and played a key role in not only it's authoring but in attempting to cram this down the throats of the American people. Carefully buried in the 1000 page bill were key sections that would have made the SPP Agenda law. I don't remember anyone discussing that with the American people? Stealth and secrecy are critical to successfully fooling the American people. Slow but steady incremental steps are the key to their betrayal of America or as Chertoff puts it, “It may take a couple of bites to digest."

This post from Bear Creek Ledger shows Chertoff and the DHS to be the go to guy in implementing the SPP agenda. It is important to remember that without Judicial Watch filing and winning a freedom of information lawsuit none of this information would be available to the general public. Such is the deceptive and deceitful nature of the current Administration. If it was just about "harmonizing" trade agreements -why be so secretive? The obvious answer is it is about more than they dare say. It is about laying the groundwork for the NAU.

Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the FOIA). This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff describes responsibilities of the agencies within DHS in the execution of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agenda. Remember SPP is not a treaty (thusly does not allow any Legislative action) and has been signed by no official of the United States yet Secretary Chertoff is enacting DHS agencies to follow and execute directives issued by this agreement.

According to the memorandum signed by Secretary Chertoff: “…The [Security and Prosperity Partnership] has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico, and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by DHS [Department of Homeland Security] should now be driven by a single agenda: the SPP.”

There is no doubt in my mind that is why Chertoff was brought on board as Secretary of DHS in 2005 by Bush. To be the point man in foisting this scam on an unsuspecting American public. He is a snake in the grass. Tom Ridge probably just didn't have the stomach for this kind of treasonous crap. Immigration Reform is the Trojan Horse they are using to promote their deceitful Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Under the banner of minority rights and the canard of racial persecution they hope to deceive America into allowing this further erosion and compromise of our national integrity. That they have been outed and temporarily stopped is a sign of hope for those of us who are real Americans and are intent on staying free Americans. But rust never sleeps and neither do the elite with their SPP agenda. Americans, beware of Greeks bearing the gifts of Free Trade agreements.

So instead of being an incompetent big mouth, Chertoff is really loyally serving who? Not the American people - that is for sure. Chertoff serves the elite - big business interests and international bankers. He serves Bush who also serves the CFR elite. He may make token public efforts at law enforcement but that is not his goal. His goal is a North American Union with open borders and unrestricted migration of cheap workers who will serve the interests of the bankers and industrialist who see Central and South America as an untapped source of endless cheap labor. He recently transferred 1000 ICE agents to Customs. If he was really intent on enforcing our immigration laws he would be adding personnel to the beleaguered and undermanned ICE department, not gutting it.

Michael Chertoff is an open border jerk-off. I can only conclude that Bush and the rest of his open border lackeys are the same or worse. They are betraying America's sovereignty with deceit and guile and fraudulent free trade agreements. As far as I'm concerned they are guilty of treason. What a travesty for America, at a time when we are attacked by terrorists and in real danger, we are betrayed from within by individuals with loyalties other than America. Criminally and with malice and deceit they use the very issue of our national security to deceive us and put in place a plan to rend the United States of America. It is a violation of their oath of office which every federal law enforcement officer takes. It is apparent to me now why I shudder at the sound of his reprehensible and deceitful guile and treason. Treachery thy name is Chertoff.

Here is the oath which Bush and Chertoff and their open border lackeys are in complete violation of - not only in spirit but the letter of the law as well.

The Oath of Office and the Constitution

Oath

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

5 U.S.C. §3331


"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

-General Douglas MacArthur

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Fox spills the beans on the Amero to Larry King

Vicente the Fox is making the talk show rounds promoting his new book, "our beaners still make better burritos than yours". OK, I'm just kidding! I don't even know the name of his stupid book and I don't care either! I don't know why he would even bother getting it published in English. Who wants to read that crap? Just because most Mexicans are too illiterate to read does not justify exporting that junk to America. We need a trade barrier and higher tariffs and a FENCE!

I don't know if he was hopped up on Mexican drugs or what but apparently he was more antsy than a Mexican jumping bean and could not keep his big mouth shut about the Amero. Thank you Vicente. While generally I despise this Fop who comes into our sovereign country and parades around and shoots his mouth off like he already owns it. I have to express my appreciation for his spilling the beans on the plans for Amero. He might be an idiot but at least he is an honest idiot.

So that ruins it for Bush and his cabal of NAU, open border, free trade liars. The amusing jelly bean dialog of the SPP seems to have expanded into an economic union and monetary union. A North American Union is the plan. Did Bush ever consider telling the American people what is going on? Does he just think that he can keep up the sham of free trade and open borders and illegal immigration forever? Like we are not going to be able to figure it out? Or does he think we just don't care? Like spoiled consumer addicts as long as we get our fix of cheap Chinese and now Mexican products we will be happy? Does he think we won't notice the 20-38 million Mexicans now living here and ruining our neighborhoods?

And why is most of the MSM silent on this issue? Could perhaps Rockerfeller be right in thanking them for remaining silent on their plans? What are those plans BTW? Anybody? Anybody? If America doesn't wake up soon from her slumber we will no longer be a sovereign nation. But as long as I get my HD TV and new Nintendo I guess it really doesn't matter. And there are always endless reruns on TV to keep me from thinking as well. I'll just keep pretending that America is a free country. A democracy in a republic. A sovereign nation of many sovereign states. Give me some more Rockerfeller Drug Cartel pain killers and I'll just fall in line with the rest of the Republican Bushbots and pretend like nothing is happening to America.

I have just one thing to say to America. Wake up or soon we will no longer be a free people. OK, I said and if you don't like it - tough. Go cry yourself a river on the banks of the Rio Grande as you watch the beaners swim by or is the correct political term now wetbacks? I get so confused by all that stuff. And God knows just how much more important that is than losing your country to the NAU of Rockerfeller and the CFR!

Vicente the Fox on the Amero

PREMEDITATED MERGER
Ex-Mexican prez: 'Amero' on the way
Vicente Fox confirms long-term deal worked out with President Bush

Posted: October 9, 2007
1:15 p.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox confirmed the existence of a plan conceived with President Bush to create a new regional currency in the Americas, in an interview last night on CNN's "Larry King Live."

It possibly was the first time a leader of Mexico, Canada or the U.S. openly confirmed a plan for a regional currency. Fox explained the current regional trade agreement that encompasses the Western Hemisphere is intended to evolve into other previously hidden aspects of integration.

According to a transcript published by CNN, King, near the end of the broadcast, asked Fox a question e-mailed from a listener, a Ms. Gonzalez from Elizabeth, N.J.: "Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?"

Fox answered in the affirmative, indicating it was a long-term plan. He admitted he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas – a free-trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere, suggesting part of the plan was to institute eventually a regional currency.

"Long term, very long term," he said. "What we proposed together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all the Americas."

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Open Borders - America is Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Revelation 6:6, 14:8, 18:3,11

..And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
..And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city.
..For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
..And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

"The economy is a tool to serve us. It is not a demi-god to be served by society."
-Sir James Goldsmith

Doesn't Nancy Pelosi look like a deer in the headlights? I've never seen a more stupid looking politician - with the exception of George Bush. This is a perfect example of how the American voter is in between a rock and a hard place these days. We've got the Republicans driving us into a ditch of economic ruin with an open border policy that just won't die. A factory export program that is second to none and a illegal labor import program to bring in cheap workers for the few industries we have left. Under the banner of Free Trade the Republicans are digging an economic ditch for America. The Democrats only solution appears to be to dig the ditch deeper. Not much of a choice there. America is truly between a rock and a hard place - and I'm not talking about the rock of Christ.

We need some fresh blood in Washington. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, and please, no more nitwits like Reid and Pelosi. Duncan Hunter is the only candidate I really like - and Tancredo - and they have been marginalized by the media. They know how to build a fence. Electing more Democrats to solve this problem is like opting to drive America's economy into a brick wall at 50 mph instead of the current 40 mph. That is the choice. Tax and spend Democrats or Tax-less and Spend-more Republicans. That is what I call being stuck in between a rock and a hard place without a good choice. Bush or Clinton? When it comes to open borders there is no difference.

Deficit spending is ruining America. Deficit spending is bankrupting America. Deficit spending is turning us into a slave nation of indentured servants by having us serve the private banks that are run by the Federal Reserve. There is nothing Federal about the FED. Talk about putting the fox in charge of the hen house. They are living high on the hog from the accumulated interest earned from America's debt. The deficit for the Federal budget is alone over 9 trillion dollars. 400 billion dollars a year is what the American taxpayer has to pay - just for the interest to that debt. Our entire national debt is over 48 trillion dollars and soaring. No - that is not a typo. Think about it. But Pelosi and Bush don't want to build a fence to protect our economy. They want to give away our economic strength and advantages to the Mexicans. Why? Compassionate conservatism? Liberal white guilt? Socialist ideals of income redistribution is more like it. It is easy for the elite to come up with plans like this. It doesn't affect their incomes. It is not coming out of their pockets. They are the ones reaping the big profits from exploiting third world countries in the name of Free Trade - the new economic world order. So the filthy rich get filthier and the poor get poorer.

This is according to Kenneth F. Scheve a Professor of Political Science at Yale University and Matthew J. Slaughter a Professor of Economics at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth who also served on the White House Council of Economic Advisers from 2005 to 2007.
Globalization has brought huge overall benefits, but earnings for most U.S. workers -- even those with college degrees -- have been falling recently; inequality is greater now than at any other time in the last 70 years. Whatever the cause, the result has been a surge in protectionism. To save globalization, policymakers must spread its gains more widely. The best way to do that is by redistributing income.
Unfortunately they recognize the economic problems due to globalization but fail to realize it is caused by the very trade policies they promote. Instead of fixing the real problem they opt for the typical socialist band-aid solution of income redistribution through even more manipulation of the tax code. Please - enough already with the taxes!

Here former Mexican President Vicente the Fox, shares his vision of a North American Union with us.
"I'm talking about a community of North America, an integrated agreement of Canada, the United States, and Mexico in the long term, 20, 30, 40 years from now. And this means that some of the steps we can take is, for instance, to agree that in five years we will make this convergence on economic variables. That may mean 10 years we can open up that border when we have reduced the gap in salaries and income."
- Former Mexican President Vicente Fox (August, 2000)
I hear you Vicente, loud and clear. "Soon the whole world will hear you". Reduce the gap in salaries and income. Open up that border. The intentional strategy to transfer wealth from the haves in America to the have nots south of the border by free trade and immigration policy. Economic variables? Isn't that the same line that the three Amigos used after the last SPP meeting on jelly beans in Quebec last August? It just goes to show that even though Mexico and Canada have different leaders now, it is the same open border agenda. Liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, Bush or Clinton, Fox or Calderon. It is the same old song and dance of the NAU. The new theme song of the New World Order.
"...We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a New World Order -- can emerge"...
-GHW Bush (September 11, 1990)
European multi-millionaire Sir James Goldsmith testified before the Senate Commerce Committee in 1994 on G.A.T.T. (General Agreements on Tariffs & Trade), which codifies trade agreements between countries under the auspices of the WTO or the UN. He described in detail how free trade agreements and globalization policies are simply a means to transfer wealth from America and industrialized countries to under developed third world nations. A redistribution of wealth on a global scale. A serious mistake. It becomes clear why they are pushing so hard for immigration reform. It is part of the plan to transfer our wealth to Mexico and South America.
"With the GATT, America will go from a trot — under the NAFTA — to a headlong gallop into total economic and social destruction."
"It must surely be a mistake to adopt an economic policy which makes you rich if you eliminate your national workforce and transfer production abroad, and which bankrupts you if you continue to employ your own people."
"Think again… one thing I pray you do. This is the single most important economic act the Western world has ever taken… it will change the life of every American." -Sir James Goldsmith
Here a few of the Marxist ideas of this new economic world order proposed in the G.A.T.T. treaty. Suffice it to say it is unadulterated one world socialism.
"...(b) The broadest co-operation of all the States members of the international community, based on equity, whereby the prevailing disparities in the world may be banished and prosperity secured for all."
"All efforts should be made to reform the international monetary system with …the following objectives:
"(h) promote an increasing net transfer of real resources from [America] the developed to the developing countries;…
"IV (a) To formulate an international code of conduct for the transfer of technology [from America] corresponding to needs and conditions prevalent in developing countries…
"(e).... Preferential treatment should be given to imports and the exports of those [developing] countries;…
…all member States [including America] pledge to make full use of the UN system in the implementation of the present "Programme of Action", …in working for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and thereby strengthening the role of the UN in the field of world-wide cooperation for economic and social development.
One world economic domination by the elite through the UN is what this trade treaty portends - all in the name of Free Trade.
The Communist maxim is: "From those according to their ability, to those according to their need". This statement from the NAU article, Chertoff, Gutierrez, Rice: Plotting Bush's North American Union, shows just how communist the idea of free trade can be.
Communist Manifesto author Karl Marx must be smiling. Speaking in 1848 to the Democratic Association of Brussels, Marx said, "In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade."
In his Manifesto, Marx wrote, "The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationalities." Remember that this is the CFR’s goal, as noted in my first bullet. For decades, CFR members have dominated the administrations of our presidents, whether they call themselves Republicans or Democrats.
Notice Marx spoke to the Democratic Association of what is now the HQ of the all powerful European Union in Brussels. While the press writes of the EU in glowing terms those in Europe that are now subjected to the autocracy of Brussels are not so happy - realizing all to late they have lost their economic freedom and national independence. Not a good trade for the illusion of economic power. But that is exactly what the CFR proposal of an NAU is for America.
"For the first time, "North America" is more than just a geographical expression. NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America...
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian interparliamentary groups into a single "North American Parliamentary Group." This might encourage legislators to stop tossing invective across their borders and instead start bargaining to solve shared problems.
- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)

Bush laughs at NAU conspiracy theories


Recently, President Bush stated that he found these fears of an SPP/NAU conspiracy "amusing." Judicial Watch does not find it amusing and is calling for complete transparency and disclosure in the matter. Something the Bush Administration has so far failed to do. A new freedom of information lawsuit was filed on Aug 10 by Judicial Watch for the release of NACC influence on the Commerce Dept, which advises our government on the SPP process. Judicial Watch's complaint is that the "Agency’s Use of
NACC (North American Competitiveness Council) in Violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act".

Our Panderer in Chief also shares his views of our blooming relationship with Mexico:
"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the New America."
"Some still look at Latin America through old stereotypes."
"But I see a hemisphere of 500 million people, striving with the dream of a better life. A dream of free markets and free people, in a hemisphere free from war and tyranny. That dream has sometimes been frustrated -- but it must never be abandoned."
"Should I become president, I will look South, not as an afterthought, but as a fundamental commitment of my presidency. Just as we ended the great divide between East and West, so today we can overcome the North-South divide."
"But the ultimate goal will remain constant ... free trade from northernmost Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."
- U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush in a campaign speech on the Western Hemisphere and Latin America, Miami, Florida (August, 2000)
Free Trade and Globalization have become the Trojan horses of the New World Order. Under the guise of Free Trade they plan to spread democracy to a globalized economy. Or should I say impose? Now this all sounds well and good when you read about it in the news but what does it really mean for America?

This is Dr. William L. Pierce's explanation:
In brief, it is a utopian system in which the U.S. economy (along with the economy of every other nation) will be "globalized"; the wage levels of U.S. and European workers will be brought down to those of workers in the Third World; national boundaries will for all practical purposes cease to exist; an increased flow of Third World immigrants into the United States and Europe will have produced a non-White majority everywhere in the formerly White areas of the world; an elite consisting of international financiers, the masters of the mass media, and managers of multinational corporations will call the shots; and United Nations "peace keeping" forces will be used to keep anyone from opting out of the system.
This explanation from
Zbigniew Brzeninski is a little more ambiguous but just as scary!
"The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values."
– Zbigniew Brzeninski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter and President Bush as co-chairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force; executive director of the Trilateral Commission
A more controlled society unrestrained by traditional values? Is that anything like Fasicm Zbigniew? And of coarse we couldn't leave out the "money changers" from the FED:
"A global economy requires a global currency."
- Paul Volcker, Former Chairman, Federal Reserve, Single Global Currency
Here is Alan Greenspan sharing his version of the commie income re-distribution plan with us in his new book: The Age of Turbulence - Adventures in a New World (Order?)
"He maintains that immigration reform, "by opening up the United States to the world's very large and growing pool of skilled workers," will help reduce the inequality of incomes.
- Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve (September, 2007)
It becomes very clear that all these powerful men are in complete agreement about our future. In fact that is the very agenda behind our open border policy. The redistribution of our wealth to the poor countries of Central and South America. It is a diabolical plot that drives immigration reform. Why would we be worried about inequality of incomes except that they plan to create a community of North America or a North American Union. If Fox knew about it, who told him? Maybe Bush told him. Although Bush is not the one behind this plan. He is just working for them. Who is "them" - then? A very good question. They are a slippery bunch. But you can find them in CFR meetings. You can find CFR members in SPP meetings and think tanks on foreign policy. You can find CFR and Trilateral Commission members all through our government - especially the State and Defense and Commerce Dept.

Well looky here! It's CFR day in the Oval Office. Notice how they all get along so very well. Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives. A regular bipartisan love fest. I'll give you a hint. It's just a game they play called politics. These are the men and women holding the reigns of power in America. Coincidentally they never have to elected. They are always appointed by the politicians we elect. They are never scrutinized by the press. It is a very unique arrangement that the CFR has developed. They have found a way to have power and control and influence in all areas of the Executive branch without having to be themselves elected.
A very convenient arrangement indeed. It is very communist.


The Council on Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
- Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations, mentor to Bill Clinton
We can't finish this expose of the New World Order without mentioning the "mother" of all Internationalists, David Rockerfeller. Without a doubt he is a key player in the scheme to de-industrialize America and render her impotent and helpless. A plan that has been many decades in the works. The Rockerfeller family and money has intimately connected with both the CFR and Trilateral Commission. Organizations whose stated goals are to create a one world government. The Rockerfeller family traditionally call themselves Republicans. They are certainly not Reagan Republicans. They are an elite family who figured how to take advantage of America's freedom and make lots of money. Some people really admire that. I'm not a Rockerfeller Republican. The ability to make millions without any regard as to the moral consequences of that gain is not an admirable character trait in my opinion.

"No man can serve both God and mammon."

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years........It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

- David Rockefeller in Baden-Baden, Germany 1991, thanking major media for keeping secret for decades the movement of the prophetic one world government.
The NWO are attempting to create an economy to be served by all. Build a fence and it will stop the NAU plans. Defeat the NAU and we will stop the NWO. Stop exporting America's industrial strength to poor third world countries and it will stop the NWO plan to bankrupt America. Stop spending money we don't have on government programs we don't need and we will stop the plan of the world bankers to make slaves of us all.

We the American people have the power and can still stop this but we must wake up and JUST BUILD THE FENCE.


Rep. Pelosi criticizes border fence

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called a plan to build fencing along parts of the Mexico border a "terrible idea" that overlooks local communities.

Pelosi made the comments during her trip to the Rio Grande Valley for the annual Hispanic Engineering, Science & Technology Week conference at the University of Texas-Pan American.

"I have been against the fence, I thought it's a bad idea even when it was just a matter of discussion," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "These are communities where you have a border going through them, they are not communities where you have a fence splitting them."

And finally here is one last quote from David Rockerfeller, revealing who he really is and who he really is for. I can assure you - that is not America.

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- Quote from David Rockefeller's Memoirs (2002)
"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

-General Douglas MacArthur


Many of the quotes used here can be found at Americans for Sovereignty . It is an excellent site and source for info on the SPP/NAU, the Amero, and the NAFTA Superhighway.