Clinton damage control imposes its will on Gov. Spitzer

I read the following article with a certain amount of amusement. These politicians are such slow learners. Apparently the Clinton people realized this issue was spiraling out of control. That we could only be so fortunate. Damage control Clinton style. Having waffled on the issue at the debate, she then committed herself to supporting Sptizer's plan to give illegal aliens drivers licences in New York so they could register to vote for her in 2008. Now that has proven to be a disaster for her poll numbers in Iowa. So the only solution was to get Spitzer to back off his plan and eat some humble pie. They hope it will all blow over and the issue will fade. Wrong again Hillary! This is not the Iraq where you can vote against it after you voted for it. This is the critical issue for America. Are we going to be a sovereign nation of many sovereign states or are we going to import millions of slave laborers from Mexico to mow our lawns and pick our lettuce?

She has shown clearly that she is for immigration reform. That means she is for importing slave laborers and giving them voting rights. The high reproduction rate of illegals insures the Democrats a majority at the voting booths across America. This is an inherent liability the gay lobby has not been able to overcome. Those gay couples don't reproduce very fast - go figure. And the no children urban yuppies don't help either. So it is obvious why panders like Hillary are falling over themselves trying to get illegal immigrant voting rights. I can only hope Wolf Blizter has enough courage not to be intimidated by the Clinton people. Hillary has existed in a bubble since she first entered the national political scene in 1992. The press essentially acts as her personal staff doing their best to make her look professional. She is know by those who have worked for her as a tyrant. The recent revelations of her planting questions in Townhall meetings and the mysterious generosity of poor Chinese immigrants have added to the recent bad smell of her campaign. It takes a village of idiots to still believe that Hillary is an honest straight forward person that represents some real hope for change in America. Apparently they have quite a few of those villages in Iowa and Hew Hampshire.

I can't help but wonder what was said to Spitzer to get him to back off this plan. Perhaps she sent him a picture of Vince Foster with a note that said, "think about it". Alas, we will probably never know the truth. Obviously he is their own personal political lapdog. In fact it was probably her people that got Spitzer to initiate the plan to get illegals registered to vote in New York for her in 2008. Bill has been very little political help for her. It seems the late nights of coke and women are finally taking their toll on Bill's wits and nose! I look forward to the debate in Vegas, only to see if she has manages to intimidate all those "boys" in the press and media. We can only hope that what happens in Vegas doesn't stay in Vegas. I'm hoping for another performance like she had in Philly. She is starting to show some real weaknesses in her ability to handle some real political pressure. If the rest of the Democratic contenders are smart they will continue to gang up on her. Not that Barack O'bomber and pretty boy Edwards represent any kind of real alternative for America either. But if Russert or Blizter don't show up for work next week she will the number one suspect on my list!

OUT-OF-GAS ELIOT PUTS THE BRAKES ON LICENSE PLAN

And poor Hillary Clinton still can't make up her mind. This latest statement completely contradicts what she told Candy Crowley of CNN just one week ago! The US Senate just took the biggest drubbing ever by the American people on this issue and she still doesn't get it? If she hadn't been so busy running fior president she might have learned something by the defeat of Shamnesty.

Clinton Says No to Licenses for Illegals
Nov 14, 5:26 PM (ET)

By DEVLIN BARRETT

WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday came out against granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, after weeks of pressure in the presidential race to take a position on a now-failed ID plan from her home state governor.
Clinton has faced criticism from candidates in both parties for her noncommittal answers on New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's attempt to allow illegal immigrants in his state to receive driver's licenses. Spitzer abandoned the effort Wednesday.
"I support Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal," Clinton said in a statement. "As president, I will not support driver's licenses for undocumented people and will press for comprehensive immigration reform that deals with all of the issues around illegal immigration including border security and fixing our broken system."
Clinton stumbled when asked about the issue during a Democratic debate two weeks ago, and her new position comes the day before another debate where opponents are expected to raise the issue again.
Rival campaigns made clear they were not letting go of the issue.

What a joke she is!!!

Local 287g enforcement works in Georgia

The following video shows that the Sheriff Dept in Cobb County, GA is having some success doing the job that Chertoff and the Dept of Homeland insecurity won't do. While the illegal alien lobbies cry wolf, the fact is that enforcement of the law is effective. If the Law was enforced uniformly throughout the country, illegal aliens would soon find that the big candy store north of the border called the U.S.A., is not such a hospitable place to "migrate too". Mexico will have to learn to fix their own problems instead of exporting them to America.

287 g - Georgia Sheriff acts on illegal immigration

Hillary Clinton - Smartest woman in the world?

In 1992 when confronted by the Flower's accusation of Bill's adulterous ways, Hillary said she wasn't a "stand by your man" kind of gal - but in 1998 there she was standing by her man who finally got caught red handed with Monica. Now she tells her Democratic rivals, "if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen." I find that very interesting because I never saw Hillary as a Betty Crocker type of gal either? I guess presidential ambitions trump the feminist liberation ideals of her formative liberal years at Wellesley. Long gone are the carefree braless summer days reading Lenin, Mao, and Friedan with Bill at Yale. Her political ambitions would also explain why she not only tolerated Bill's adultery but zealously defended him. He was after all her meal ticket to the Whitehouse. Now is that a marriage made in heaven, or hell?

Here is my simple question for Hillary. If you are so smart why are you taking a position on Spitzer's plan for legal drivers licences for illegals that according to a recent poll 77% of Americans are against? Well, she now admits, "I wasn't at my best the other night". So even the smartest woman in the world can have a bad night. But what was a bad night has now been extended into a bad week. According to Lou Dobbs recent polls have her plummeting 7% since the fateful debate when she was outed by the now reviled Tim Russert. Funny, I always thought of Russert was one of the good 'ol liberal boys in the media. He ought to be careful or he could end up swimming with the fishes like Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and James Macdougal, but I digress into the as yet unproven allegations that she had something to do with their convenient and untimely demise. Some say that Bill is the one that had them killed but I'll confess I've always seen the killer potential in Hillary. Cold hearted, cruel, calculating, corrupt, and cool headed are some of the more dominant characteristics I've seen in her over the years. And we have seen her lose her cool now haven't we!

Pandering to illegals and "immigration reform" is political suicide for any politician of either party in America today - Massachusetts Kennedy fans(morons) excepted. In her recent interview with Candy Crowley of CNN, she stubbornly defended her support of the issue. She ought to consult with immigration flip-flopper John (I never met an illegal I didn't like) McCain on just how unpopular an issue this is with the American people. It just killed his presidential bid. It will end hers too and rightfully so as it was during the Clinton years when illegal immigration went from a trickle to a flood. NAFTA, free trade and open borders were all Clinton policies. Free trade in humans too apparently "doing the work that Americans won't do." It is a losing issue of the ruling oligarchy of international bankers and business and the one world global elitists.

So you can't say she was just having a bad night. She is finally revealing her true chameleon nature. The veneer of her "noblesse oblige" has worn off. A chicken in every pot and $5000 for every baby. Flip flopping along like John Kerry and pandering to illegals like Bush. We already have a 'Panderer in Chief' in the Whitehouse. We don't need another. Within two minutes she was both for and against the Spitzer plan. Well, apparently now after consulting with her staff she has decided to come out for "immigration reform." Now there is a platform with real populist support! All I can say is, "you go girl." I'd also have to say she looked terrible tonight on CNN. With those baggy eyes, tight bitchy lips and strident tone she looked like she hadn't slept in a week. Apparently she has now forsaken the cleavage strategy that never could keep Bill's interest for a real winning issue like "immigration reform." She really hasn't got all that much going for her, with the exception of the MSM constantly lauding her and all that dirty campaign money being laundered through Chinatown. Who would have guessed that she was such a draw with Chinese immigrants that can't speak a lick of English. And just how does somebody making $10 dollars an hour come up with a $1000 political gift for Hillary anyway? That some sacrifice! A real widow's mite.

And to add more fuel to the fire Kathleen Willey, former Bill Clinton fan, wants to pile on to poor Hillary too with her new book accusing the Clintons of killing her husband? Wow, just how far will Bill go to get laid? Do I see a pattern here? Can anybody connect the dots? Oh, the injustice of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy! Just how gullible are the Democrats? Just how desperate are they to return to power? Who could be dense enough to be fooled by this pair of Arkansas "white trash" love birds. But, there they go again and Bill's recent feeble attempt to defend his "wife" from being swiftboated seems to have backfired already. Oh - for the good old days when the Clintons could say anything and get away with it.

O.K., I admit it. I don't feel sorry for them at all! Does that now make me a part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? Oh, I do hope so!

All I can say for Hillary is "You Go Girl"!




Lou Dobbs rags on both Hillary and the Democrats

Peter Schiff says 3.9% economic growth baloney

While I am usually reticent to write about economic matters in detail. Lacking a degree in economics and having only a elementary understanding of investment strategies I am hesitant to wade into this morass. In reality however only a little common sense is required to see the dire state of our economy and country. Those with the degrees are themselves the ones that have created this mess over the last 40 years. The masters of economics theories that are tethered only to an unprincipled lust for profit.

The recent announcement of a 3.9% economic growth in the third quarter by our government seemed more than a little suspect to me. I have mentioned my concerns to many about our economic problems for months. In faithful conservative Republican circles I am often greeted with derision and hubris for even daring to mention that we are headed for some economic rough going in the not so distant future. As if the economy were itself some animated god impervious to the obvious laws of nature. Immune to the of cause and effect of mankind. Epithets like commie and socialist are often directed at me by the standard knee jerk Republican reaction to any type of real thought about our disastrous free trade and economic strategies. Some educated and some uninformed, all displaying a naive faith in an economic dogma that itself is flawed. Meanwhile, America's middle class bears the burden on their way to foreclosure. The American dream is being bankrupted by destructive and foolish deficit economic strategies that only benefit the fat cats on Wall street. And soon they too will have to pay the piper.

Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Capitol recently wrote an article detailing just how ludicrous the government claim of recent economic growth is. By fudging the inflation index they are able to claim growth in our economy that in reality is in recession. By any objective indicator our economy is shrinking not growing. So if the government thinks they can prop up this deficit economy with false numbers they are only fooling themselves and those still believe in our own government. Who on earth would still be that gullible and naive?

I will post his entire article since he explains our economic situation much better than I can.

The US Commerce Department’s latest numbers are meaningless
By:Peter Schiff

Yesterday, as the US dollar fell to new record lows and oil and gold prices surged to new highs, the US Commerce Department delivered meaningless government data that managed to report the lowest US inflation in the last half century. Wall Street was hardly fooled.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by 390 points, or 2.6 percent, to be followed down by Asian markets today. According to Bloomberg, the Morgan Stanley Capital International Asia-Pacific Index lost 1.3 percent to 170.10 as of 9:30 a.m. in Tokyo, falling from a record. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average declined 1.9 percent to 16,554.02. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 Index dropped from a high. All markets open for trading retreated

These bizarre numbers were integral in allowing the Commerce Department to report 3.9 percent annualized GDP growth in the third quarter, which was heralded by the bulls as evidence that a resilient U.S. economy had shrugged off the problems in the housing and mortgage markets. However, the government’s ability to make “economic growth” magically appear is based purely on statistical finesse.

To arrive at this rate, the government had to assume that inflation during the quarter ran at an annualized rate of .8 percent (that’s less than 1 percent). That is the lowest rate of inflation used to calculate U.S. GDP since the Eisenhower administration. With oil priced at almost $100 per barrel, gold futures trading over $800 per ounce, the dollar hitting record lows, and the Fed printing money like it is going out of style, the government has the nerve to claim that current inflation is the lowest it has been in half a century. Unbelievable!

Just in case there is some confusion, the government adjusts nominal GDP gains using the GDP deflator, which represents the inflation rate during the time period being measured. This is done to strip inflation out of the GDP calculation so that only real growth gets counted: not nominal gains that result purely from inflation.

The consensus estimate for 3rd quarter GDP growth was 3.4 percent. The reason we beat that number was that the government adjusted the nominal 4.7 percent gain by a mere .8 percent. Had the government assumed a higher rate of inflation, say 2.6 percent (identical to the rate used to deflate second quarter GDP,) the 3rd quarter gain would have been only 2.1 percent, well shy of the consensus forecast. My guess is that inflation is actually running at an annualized rate closer to 10 percent. Therefore using a more honest deflator, the U.S. economy is actually contracting, which would explain the recent anecdotal evidence provided by various economic polls, voter dissatisfaction and consumer sentiment numbers. In fact, if one simply measures U.S. GDP using gold or any other currency, it is clear that we are already in a recession.

Similar illusions are created in other numbers, such as retail sales, corporate earnings, and stock prices, which are all rising merely as a result of actual inflation being higher than the official reports. For example, higher retail sales reflect consumers paying higher prices for the products that they buy. They may in fact be buying less stuff, but are paying more for it. Further, part of the gains result from tourists using their appreciated foreign currencies to buy products cheaper here than they can in the own countries. I have heard about Canadians checking into U.S. hotels with empty suitcases, crossing the border to indulge in weekend shopping sprees.

Corporate earnings, particularly those of multi-nationals, are padded as their foreign currency denominated earnings translate into more dollars when those earnings are repatriated. However, such gains are illusions, as companies merely earn more dollars of diminished value for the goods they sell. The actual volume of exports does not necessarily improve much, as evidenced by weak industrial production and manufacturing employment. When those additional debased dollars are paid out as dividends, they confer no real increase in global purchasing power to shareholders.

Similarly, just as inflation causes prices to rise for goods and services it causes stock prices to rise as well. Though such gains may be less than the actual increase in the cost of living, as long as the government gets away with using bogus CPI numbers which fail to fully reflect inflation, Wall Street takes credit for nominal gains as if they were real.

However, as ridiculous as the phony GDP number was, yesterday’s biggest joke was a report on global competitiveness put out by the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, which ranked the U.S. economy as the world’s most competitive. To arrive at this conclusion, the forum has obliterated the obvious under a mountain of theory. In determining country rankings, the WEF weighed strengths in their "12 Pillars of Competitiveness", including: institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic stability, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labor market efficiency, financial market sophistication, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication and innovation. Completely ignored however are the measurable results of competitiveness, notably a trade surplus and a strong currency.

It is as if the WEF decided to judge a weight loss contest without using a scale, by instead focusing only on mental attitude, dedication, perseverance, and nutritional education! As a result the prize is awarded to the fattest contestant. Based on the empirical evidence of a gargantuan trade deficit, staggering global indebtedness, and a declining currency, the United States is clearly not the most competitive economy in the world.

I saw Peter Schiff on Glenn Beck last week. Here is the recording.

The Late Great USA by Jerome Corsi - Book Review

"The development of a North American consciousness will likely come from increased trade and investment among the three NAFTA partners."
-Toward a North American Community Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

I just finished reading my copy of The Late Great USA, by Jerome Corsi. It is a good read and a fascinating look into the belly of the beast, so to speak, of the North American Union. I will admit that at first I was a little hesitant to read this book. Though I found the subject compelling I had an aversion to reading about it in depth. Perhaps I thought it would be boring - it was not. Perhaps I was afraid of what I would find out - I was not. I could not actually put my finger on what was causing me to procrastinate. Perhaps it was just that - procrastination.

If you are concerned about the future of our great country then this book is a must read. Why? Because if you don't read it you will not fully understand what is going on in America today. I thought I did - but I found out many things I was not aware of. For instance I had no idea how the European Union came to be. I had read about it in the news at some point a few years back and thought to myself, "Well, that sounds like a great idea." Little did I know what it might portend for America. There are some very valid reasons to form the EU. The history of Europe's wars are a good one. There are none to form a North American Union, with the exception of greed and the insatiable lust for more power by the elite.

Corsi begins by showing the motive and method for forming the EU. A fifty year plan that was fully realized some 22 years after Jean Monnet, the French architect and "father" of the EU had died in 1979. Through a well laid plan of stealth and slow incremental economic and trade agreements, the foundation was laid for the eventual EU and the Euro. It was discussed as part of an ongoing public policy debate in Europe over the years. So far there has been virtually no public debate on the NAU. In fact if anyone tries to bring it up they are immediately tarred and feathered as a conspiratorial nut and ridiculed and derided as delusional and paranoid. That type of response in and of itself ought to arouse suspicions as to the true motive and intent of the NAFTA/SPP/NAU agenda, which originated in the exclusive 'think tanks' of the CFR elite.

There numerous parallels between the formation of the EU and what is happening now with the so called Free Trade Agreement of NAFTA and the more secretive SPP agenda. The EU began with an innocent Coal and Steel Trade Agreement between France and Germany in 1950. Fifty years later it had developed into a full blown autocratic bureaucracy centered in Brussels with a common currency. Nameless "working groups" of faceless bureaucrats now decide the fate of Europe. Though the crumbling edifice of an elected representative government still exists - in reality Brussels determines the fate of Europe. The Central Bank of the EU controls Europe now. Is this our fate as well? To be controlled by Banks of Wall Street?

The method of the Bush Administration in pursuing this SPP agenda would have left Bill Clinton in awe. Word games, semantics and ambiguous definitions of what the meaning of is - is, characterize this less than forth coming administration. No wonder Bush gave Clinton a virtual blanket pardon when elected in 2000. Through carefully crafted "dialogs" that avoid the lawful process of Congressional oversight of treaties and legislation, they have forged ahead purposely avoiding any real public debate on this issue. Dishonesty, deceitfulness, stealth and denial are the methods of hundreds of "working groups". A shadow government that exists within the framework of our current Federal government. Appointed by Bush they utilize public time and taxpayer money to work on deceptively worded terms such as "harmonizing economic variables." FOIA requests are the only way Judicial Watch has been able to pry the jealously guarded scraps of information from the mouth of this stealthy but ravenous beast. Nothing is revealed openly and like a great battle every hill seems to be contested by those dedicated to the elusive non-existent cause of the NAU. "Methinks the lady doth protest too much."

The so called "urban legend" but often discussed NAFTA Super Highway is a good case in point. This highway was mandated by the NAFTA agreement but now it mysteriously doesn't exist anymore? Now the Bush administration plays word games and semantics around the idea. I guess they think we are stupid. Meanwhile the TxDOT moves forward with plans and land seizures and artist renderings like the Trans-Texas Corridor pictured here. They are subcontracting the project out to a Spanish firm (No not Mexican!), for an estimated cost of @$190 billion dollars. To add insult to injury Americans will have to pay tolls to the Spanish firm Cintra in order to use it! If it doesn't exist then just where is it coming from and where does it go then? What is it's non-existant purpose? They state very clearly that it is for bringing goods from China and Asia through Mexico and transporting them to the US and Canada. But we are suppose to believe it is not a critical part of a NAFTA Super Highway? Why through Mexico? No Teamsters Unions or Longshoreman Unions to deal with. No independent American Truckers. Less shipping costs and more profits for the multinational Corporations that are intentionally destroying America's economic and industrial strength for filthy lucre. The God of Free Trade is profit but "what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul in hell?"

The Bush administration is starting to take so much flak that they've put up an official government disinformation site. The following was posted about the non-existent NAFTA Super Highway:

Myth: The U.S. Government, working though the SPP, has a secret plan to build a "NAFTA Super Highway."

Fact: The U.S. government is not planning a NAFTA Super Highway. The U.S. government does not have the authority to designate any highway as a NAFTA Super Highway, nor has it sought such authority, nor is it planning to seek such authority. There are private and state level interests planning highway projects which they themselves describe as "NAFTA Corridors," but these are not Federally-driven initiatives, and they are not a part of the SPP.
-http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp

Yea, sure it isn't and "these are not the droids your looking for" either! An interesting and very careful choice of words. So they admit it exists but they have nothing to do with it. Nothing could be further from the truth. NAFTA is a Federal initiative and so is the SPP. SPP is an extension or continuation of NAFTA, although they are trying to do an end run around the US Constitution by calling it just an "ongoing dialog," or "a process." If it were so good for America you would think that they would be very proud of it and want to take credit for it as politicians are often want to do? Interestingly they claim that these are just "private and state interests". So are we to believe that states decided to do this on their own with no input or oversight from the Feds?

Even more troubling is the claim that this is a private interest. Who's private interest would that be? So big business is running the US Government? Is that what they are admitting? The NACC is advising the SPP which is controlling our government? Private business interests take precedent over the national security in an elected representative government now? This is a morally corrupt group of people and they are not just Republicans. Don't think for a minute if Al Gore or John Kerry were President it would be any better. This process was started under Bill Clinton and it will probably be worse if Hitlary gets elected.

O.K., so maybe it's not a NAFTA Super Highway, maybe it's really called a NASCO Super Corridor? What difference does it make what it is called? That is not the point. It still has the same purpose. Just because it's a state or private interest doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Is the Bush Administration trying to claim that they have no interest in a project of this size? That they have no responsibility for it? That they have no Federal authority over it? What the hell are they doing running the US government then? They ought to fired for being incompetent and inept or better yet impeached. Interestingly this particular picture was removed from the NASCO site after they started receiving a lot of attention over it - but we still have a copy! The very idea of building a project of this size and magnitude without any Federal oversight is patently ridiculous and a flagrant lie.

At a NASCO forum held on April 30, 2004 in Fort Worth, Texas Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta told the NASCO meeting:

"The people in this room have vision. Thinking ahead, thinking long-term, you began to make aggressive plans to develop the NASCO trade corridor – this vital artery in our national transportation through which so much of our NAFTA traffic flows.

"It flows across our nation's busiest southern border crossing in Laredo; over North America's busiest commercial crossing, the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit; and through Duluth, and Peombina, North Dakota, and all the places in between."

"And to our friends from Mexico who are here today, I say, 'Welcome, and get ready.' Opening the border is of mutual benefit."

Just how is opening the border of mutual benefit to us? Oh excuse me, you meant mutually for the Chinese and your buddies getting rich off all that free trade? So if Mineta was not representing the Federal interests in this project - just who's interest is he representing? His big business buddies in NASCO? His big business buddies in the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC)? Is that what Bush means by private interests? I have to wonder how the Bush Administration's denial fits into this very revealing statement. Even on Mineta's website his speech is titled:

"NORTH AMERICA’S SUPERHIGHWAY COALITION TRANSPORTATION FORUM"

But somehow Bush can send his SPP lackey Jeffrey N. Shane to Congress and tell us with a straight face there is no plan for a superhighway and it is an "urban legend." Mineta called the NASCO Trade Corridor "a vital artery of our national transportation." Is he refering to the non-existant NAFTA super highway or the "urban legend"? It sounds pretty Federal to me. After all he is part of the Federal government? More Bush word games. Mineta is out there lauding the project and his undersecretary Shane is in front of Congress lying about it - saying it doesn't exist and calling it an "urban legend". Where is the MSM on this one? Silent as Rockerfeller promised. When Clinton was President, Republicans chaffed at his blatant lying. Have they now had a change of heart? A taste of power? Notice how Mineta calls it North America's Superhighway? Not America's anymore. North America - get used to it. More not so subtle SPP/NAU jargon of Robert Pastor. Corsi correctly identifies CFR member Pastor as the "father' of the idea of North American Union.

Jerome Corsi has an interesting literary background. Liberal Democrats still froth at the mouth for his part in "outing" John Kerry in the 2004 election with Unfit for Command. So Kerry was a pompous fraud that kept wounding himself because he was to stupid to learn the safe range of the M79 Grenade Launcher. Get over it! He lied so he could get purple hearts awarded when he should have received a band-aid. Get over it! He lied to Congress and the American people about the war just to get into politics and make a name for himself. Get over it! He stabbed his own soldiers in the back by lying about them and comparing them to Genghis Khan. Get over it! We have bigger fish to fry here.

It actually gives Corsi a lot of credibility in my estimation because like myself, here is a guy that supported Bush in both elections. Once he learned the truth about the CFR intention to create a North American Union and what was really behind our open borders and unofficial illegal immigration policy he did not hesitate to "out" Bush. So I consider him to be a true America hero for writing this book. Heck maybe GW should award him the Medal of Freedom. That is something Bush will surely never receive. Corsi pursues this touchy subject with an admirable measure of judicious restraint and objective analysis. All information is clearly documented and can be verified quite easily as I did myself on the important issues that I wanted to check.

Is the plan to create a North American Union a product of paranoid conspiratorial delusion or a reality being put into action as we speak by OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS? Corsi provides the clear documentation needed to show that it is indeed a real plan. It seems the only real conspiracy is the one by those involved including the media to deny it. Those easily led and fooled will of coarse repeat the denials with little if no real thought or investigation. Blind partisan political loyalties take priority over the truth these days. Bushbots or Clinton clones, it matters not. Such is the sorry state of political discourse for many in America today. Future generations depend on us to be alert and vigilant. They depend on us to take decisive action to preserve America's sovereignty and destiny to be a beacon of freedom to the world. The elite would twist that into a beacon free trade under a One World Government that they control. That was not the intent of our founding fathers. Greed and the lust for money has twisted their loyalty and honor. Though they were born American they have no allegiance to America, our country, the home of the free and the brave.

There is much more covered in the book and I highly recommend that you get a copy and read it.

• Details of the NAFTA Free Trade fraud and ongoing SPP deception.
• Funny money accounting practices that hide the magnitude of the real Federal budget deficits.
• A Customs port in Kansas City built and paid for by American taxpayers and refered to as "Mexican sovereign territory.
• Self destructive Free trade policies that hide the VAT (value added Tax) of other countries and are unfair to American workers and companies.
• Massive trade deficits that are bankrupting America.

These are just some of the critical issues covered in detail by Corsi. "The very future of our great country and destiny depends upon it. You can even read it on Amazon as it is not out in paperback yet. I bought my copy at World Net Daily.

"By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the New America."
- George W. Bush, candidate for president of the United States (August, 2000)

God Bless America!!!
Words and music by Irving Berlin
© Copyright 1938, 1939 by Irving Berlin

"While the storm clouds gather far across the sea,
Let us swear allegiance to a land that's free,
Let us all be grateful for a land so fair,
As we raise our voices in a solemn prayer. "

God Bless America,
Land that I love.
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam
God bless America, My home sweet home.

Chertoff - the open border jerk-off

Micheal Chertoff has been working overtime recently - running his mouth again. An appropriate endeavor for a Harvard trained lawyer. He is quite good at it though - running his mouth I mean. It is that which comes out of it that I find so disturbing. O.K., I admit it - I find his picture quite disturbing as well. Some have even compared him to Skelator. Just how did a Harvard trained lawyer that was appointed as a Federal Judge ever end up in charge of America's security in the first place? What were his qualifications for this important position? How did this clown ever get put into a position of being one of the most powerful men in America - in charge of our "Homeland Security"? Which begs the question - why is it called the Department of Homeland Security anyway? I find the term rather un-American, like intelligence or terror Czar. What are we like Europeans now? Homeland? Czars? These are not terms we commonly use in America or American politics - but they do use them in Europe. In the European Union for instance. Anyway, I'll get into that critical issue later in this post.

Michael Chertoff is an open border, pro-illegal immigration promoting yappy dog for his handler El Presidente Bush. It is understandable why he has never had any experience in getting elected in politics. The mere sound of his snotty condescending voice incites reactions in me, which if acted on, would have me confined behind bars for the rest of my earthly life. So why do I find this pretentious jerk-off so detestable? Some claim that he is a perfect example of governmental incompetence and should be summarily fired (I would like to suggest perhaps he should be frog marched around Washington by Joe Wilson). Unable and also apparently unwilling to secure our borders and therefore America that would seem the prudent solution. But perhaps there is more to this "jerk-off" than first appears. Obviously our own open border panderer in chief has no intention of firing him. He is probably simply elated with him.

Chertoff inherited perhaps the most thankless job in America today. He certainly is not responsible for our broken borders. That mess goes back decades. Reagan tried to fix it with an amnesty bill in 1986 and failed. The enforcement measures were never implemented. Not only were the laws never enforced but they were watered down incrementally by liberal legislation under Bush, Clinton and Bush again. So we can't blame him for the problem - but we can blame him for not fixing it. Chertoff 's job description should be updated to read something like this. "Spend a lot of time and money convincing the American people that your really trying to fix our broken borders but don't do anything to actually close our borders and protect America and at all costs find anyway to obstruct the lawful implementation of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 and above all else do not build a fence."

So now you see why Chertoff is perhaps one of the most qualified people in America for this job. He has no intention of securing our borders or stopping illegal immigration. He has no intention of deporting illegals back to the country of origin. It is not that he is corrupt and incompetent. He is doing exactly what he is suppose to do - pretend that he is trying to stop illegal immigration while using every little Harvard lawyer trick in the book he can think of to actually increase it. Remember this, "jerk-off" works for a guy who has openly stated that he is against a fence and therefore against securing our borders. His recent appearance on the Glenn Beck show proves my point. He spent the entire time trying to convince us that he really is trying to enforce the law and build a fence but he is being obstructed by a "Federal Judge". Wow, I really feel your pain Michael. We, the American people, are the ones being obstructed by a former Federal Judge. This is a guy that finds more whiny excuses for why he can't do his job than a professional politician.

Here are just a few of the jerk-off's recent illegal immigration statements that reveal his lack of real interest in enforcing our current immigration laws.

"Every time a Border Patrol officer is transporting a load of future housekeepers and landscapers to someplace to be returned, he's not looking for drug dealers or drug loads," Chertoff said.

Commenting to Wolf Blizter on the growing opposition to his Shamnesty Bill.

"Yea, well first I understand there's some people who expect ah anything other than capitol punishment is an amnesty."

And again commenting on the recent defeat of Shamnesty

"I'm disappointed about the fact that there were some necessary tools which we needed to be able to do more than we can currently do in enforcing the law that were left on the floor of the Senate today," Chertoff said.

Here he is running his little open border yapper down in Texas.

Chertoff told a border-security conference in El Paso, Texas, that his department was now faced with having to enforce immigration laws that not only pull resources away from dealing with security threats but also have a negative impact on agriculture and other economic sectors that have become dependent on illegal migrant labor.

Homeland Security found itself facing “a need to pursue people coming here (illegally) to work, taking time away from (pursuing people) who are coming here to do us harm” like drug smugglers and terrorists.

Chertoff said he does not necessarily expect another vast comprehensive immigration package like the stalled reform bill. “It may take a couple of bites to digest,” he said.

But in the meantime his department and other federal agencies “had no choice” but to enforce existing laws, with consequences that will be “quite serious for some sectors” of the U.S. economy, like farming.

"In the end, it's very hard to secure the border with only brute force," he said. "It can be done, but it's going to be a labor-intensive and time-consuming way to do it."

What a joke! He's like a Sheriff claiming he doesn't have enough deputies to arrest a vandal because there might be some bank robbers out there somewhere getting away. If he doesn't have enough resources to do his job why doesn't he just go to congress and ask for what he needs? He is the very definition of non-enforcement. This is coming from our top Border Enforcement Officer mind you. Leadership works from the top down. How do you think the people that are working for him feel that are out there putting their lives on the life to secure our borders and keep America safe. Border Patrol Agents like Ramos and Compean. He actually states that he is for illegals coming here to work and to have to do something about it interferes with his real job of defending our borders from terrorists and drug dealers and gangs. And incidentally he also claims it will hurt our economy and cause us to send even more jobs offshore. So he even admits that exporting American jobs really is bad for us AND THEY KNOW IT! What a bunch of lying hypocrites. This is just another pathetic excuse by him to avoid doing his job. If the border were protected we could stop them all couldn't we Michael? And explain just how our border agents are going to be able to tell a serial rapist or murderer from a lettuce picker or landscaper? And please Michael, don't tell me you going to do it with your "gut feeling."

Is Chertoff a Harvard trained psychic too? Here the jerk-off freelances in seasonal terror attack predictions. Chertoff: Hunch Terror Attack Coming

U.S. counter-terror officials are warning of an increased risk of an attack this summer, given al-Qaida's apparent interest in summertime strikes and increased al-Qaida training in the Afghan-Pakistani border region.

On Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune that he had a "gut feeling" about a new period of increased risk.He based his assessment on earlier patterns of terrorists in Europe and intelligence he would not disclose.

"Summertime seems to be appealing to them," Chertoff said in his discussion with the newspaper about terrorists. "We worry that they are rebuilding their activities."

So if anyone thinks Chertoff is serious about stopping illegal immigration at our border I've got some swamp land to sell you down in Florida as well. He is serious about something though and that is the SPP/NAU agenda of the CFR. He has been one of the prime movers in the SPP talks. He is thoroughly briefed in the plan to establish an NAU and open borders and free migration are a key part of this plan. So where does the creation of the Dept of Homeland Defense fit into all this? Well that is precisely why it is called "Homeland Defense". It is not called American Defense or U.S. Defense or anything that relates to the concept of American national sovereignty. The reason is that the plan for the Defense is a continental defense. That includes relying on the corrupt and incompetent Mexican Army for our national security. In other words they are trying to create a defensive perimeter around the entire North American Continent. So the use of the phrase and ambiguity about "Homeland Defense" is intentional. It could mean America as we thought or it could mean a North American Union in the future. It could include Mexico and Canada and they wouldn't have to paint new logos on all those cars again. Saving the U.S. Taxpayers money!

Here are some statements by Robert Pastor a radical left-wing communist supporting university professor (imagine that), who is a passionate advocate of the NAU. According to Jerome Corsi, author of the NYT bestselling book, The Late Great U.S.A., Robert Pastor should be considered the father or main architect of the idea of North American Union.

"What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which will mean that goods can move easily across the border. We want a common security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of people within North America."
-Robert Pastor, Independent task force member, Council of Foreign Relations Independent Task Force on North America

Overcoming the tension between security and trade requires a bolder approach to continental integration: a North American customs union with a common external tariff (CET), which would significantly reduce border inspections and eliminate cumbersome rules-of-origin provisions designed to deny non-NAFTA products the same easy access. All three governments must also rethink the continental perimeter. Along with the CET, they should establish a "North American Customs and Immigration Force," composed of officials trained together in a single professional school, and they should fashion procedures to streamline border-crossing documentation. Most important, the Department of Homeland Security should expand its mission to include continental security -- a shift best achieved by incorporating Mexican and Canadian perspectives and personnel into its design and operation."
- Robert Pastor, North America's Second Decade from Foreign Affairs (January/February 2004)

North American Union Traitors Include Chertoff, Rice, Bush


So just what does Chertoff know about the NAU and when did he know it? I would expect that he knows a lot more than I do. It would certainly explain his pompous condescending know it all attitude towards America's rejection of his fraudulent immigration reform bill. He sees himself I'm sure, as the new Security Czar for a future North American Union. I understand now why they call it a Czar! It does not even bear a faint resemblance to our constitutional form of representative government. Congress has not been consulted nor have any treaties been ratified - yet the "amusing jelly bean dialogue" continues. The term dictatorial comes to mind. Chertoff has been present at all the important meetings and has played a pivotal role in advancing the SPP agenda. Immigration reform was the keystone of the plan to begin removing all restrictions for workers migrating to America. According to Corsi this was their first attempt to go public with the SPP agenda and it failed. Chertoff was one of the architects of Shamnesty and played a key role in not only it's authoring but in attempting to cram this down the throats of the American people. Carefully buried in the 1000 page bill were key sections that would have made the SPP Agenda law. I don't remember anyone discussing that with the American people? Stealth and secrecy are critical to successfully fooling the American people. Slow but steady incremental steps are the key to their betrayal of America or as Chertoff puts it, “It may take a couple of bites to digest."

This post from Bear Creek Ledger shows Chertoff and the DHS to be the go to guy in implementing the SPP agenda. It is important to remember that without Judicial Watch filing and winning a freedom of information lawsuit none of this information would be available to the general public. Such is the deceptive and deceitful nature of the current Administration. If it was just about "harmonizing" trade agreements -why be so secretive? The obvious answer is it is about more than they dare say. It is about laying the groundwork for the NAU.

Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the FOIA). This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff describes responsibilities of the agencies within DHS in the execution of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agenda. Remember SPP is not a treaty (thusly does not allow any Legislative action) and has been signed by no official of the United States yet Secretary Chertoff is enacting DHS agencies to follow and execute directives issued by this agreement.

According to the memorandum signed by Secretary Chertoff: “…The [Security and Prosperity Partnership] has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico, and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by DHS [Department of Homeland Security] should now be driven by a single agenda: the SPP.”

There is no doubt in my mind that is why Chertoff was brought on board as Secretary of DHS in 2005 by Bush. To be the point man in foisting this scam on an unsuspecting American public. He is a snake in the grass. Tom Ridge probably just didn't have the stomach for this kind of treasonous crap. Immigration Reform is the Trojan Horse they are using to promote their deceitful Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Under the banner of minority rights and the canard of racial persecution they hope to deceive America into allowing this further erosion and compromise of our national integrity. That they have been outed and temporarily stopped is a sign of hope for those of us who are real Americans and are intent on staying free Americans. But rust never sleeps and neither do the elite with their SPP agenda. Americans, beware of Greeks bearing the gifts of Free Trade agreements.

So instead of being an incompetent big mouth, Chertoff is really loyally serving who? Not the American people - that is for sure. Chertoff serves the elite - big business interests and international bankers. He serves Bush who also serves the CFR elite. He may make token public efforts at law enforcement but that is not his goal. His goal is a North American Union with open borders and unrestricted migration of cheap workers who will serve the interests of the bankers and industrialist who see Central and South America as an untapped source of endless cheap labor. He recently transferred 1000 ICE agents to Customs. If he was really intent on enforcing our immigration laws he would be adding personnel to the beleaguered and undermanned ICE department, not gutting it.

Michael Chertoff is an open border jerk-off. I can only conclude that Bush and the rest of his open border lackeys are the same or worse. They are betraying America's sovereignty with deceit and guile and fraudulent free trade agreements. As far as I'm concerned they are guilty of treason. What a travesty for America, at a time when we are attacked by terrorists and in real danger, we are betrayed from within by individuals with loyalties other than America. Criminally and with malice and deceit they use the very issue of our national security to deceive us and put in place a plan to rend the United States of America. It is a violation of their oath of office which every federal law enforcement officer takes. It is apparent to me now why I shudder at the sound of his reprehensible and deceitful guile and treason. Treachery thy name is Chertoff.

Here is the oath which Bush and Chertoff and their open border lackeys are in complete violation of - not only in spirit but the letter of the law as well.

The Oath of Office and the Constitution

Oath

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

5 U.S.C. §3331

---

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

-General Douglas MacArthur

Fox spills the beans on the Amero to Larry King

Vicente the Fox is making the talk show rounds promoting his new book, "our beaners still make better burritos than yours". OK, I'm just kidding! I don't even know the name of his stupid book and I don't care either! I don't know why he would even bother getting it published in English. Who wants to read that crap? Just because most Mexicans are too illiterate to read does not justify exporting that junk to America. We need a trade barrier and higher tariffs and a FENCE!

I don't know if he was hopped up on Mexican drugs or what but apparently he was more antsy than a Mexican jumping bean and could not keep his big mouth shut about the Amero. Thank you Vicente. While generally I despise this Fop who comes into our sovereign country and parades around and shoots his mouth off like he already owns it. I have to express my appreciation for his spilling the beans on the plans for Amero. He might be an idiot but at least he is an honest idiot.

So that ruins it for Bush and his cabal of NAU, open border, free trade liars. The amusing jelly bean dialog of the SPP seems to have expanded into an economic union and monetary union. A North American Union is the plan. Did Bush ever consider telling the American people what is going on? Does he just think that he can keep up the sham of free trade and open borders and illegal immigration forever? Like we are not going to be able to figure it out? Or does he think we just don't care? Like spoiled consumer addicts as long as we get our fix of cheap Chinese and now Mexican products we will be happy? Does he think we won't notice the 20-38 million Mexicans now living here and ruining our neighborhoods?

And why is most of the MSM silent on this issue? Could perhaps Rockerfeller be right in thanking them for remaining silent on their plans? What are those plans BTW? Anybody? Anybody? If America doesn't wake up soon from her slumber we will no longer be a sovereign nation. But as long as I get my HD TV and new Nintendo I guess it really doesn't matter. And there are always endless reruns on TV to keep me from thinking as well. I'll just keep pretending that America is a free country. A democracy in a republic. A sovereign nation of many sovereign states. Give me some more Rockerfeller Drug Cartel pain killers and I'll just fall in line with the rest of the Republican Bushbots and pretend like nothing is happening to America.

I have just one thing to say to America. Wake up or soon we will no longer be a free people. OK, I said and if you don't like it - tough. Go cry yourself a river on the banks of the Rio Grande as you watch the beaners swim by or is the correct political term now wetbacks? I get so confused by all that stuff. And God knows just how much more important that is than losing your country to the NAU of Rockerfeller and the CFR!

Vicente the Fox on the Amero

PREMEDITATED MERGER
Ex-Mexican prez: 'Amero' on the way
Vicente Fox confirms long-term deal worked out with President Bush

---

Posted: October 9, 2007
1:15 p.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox confirmed the existence of a plan conceived with President Bush to create a new regional currency in the Americas, in an interview last night on CNN's "Larry King Live."

It possibly was the first time a leader of Mexico, Canada or the U.S. openly confirmed a plan for a regional currency. Fox explained the current regional trade agreement that encompasses the Western Hemisphere is intended to evolve into other previously hidden aspects of integration.

According to a transcript published by CNN, King, near the end of the broadcast, asked Fox a question e-mailed from a listener, a Ms. Gonzalez from Elizabeth, N.J.: "Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?"

Fox answered in the affirmative, indicating it was a long-term plan. He admitted he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas – a free-trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere, suggesting part of the plan was to institute eventually a regional currency.

"Long term, very long term," he said. "What we proposed together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all the Americas."